×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 901 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Polcompball Wiki

    Marxism, commonly called Classical Marxism or Orthodox Marxism, also called Marxist Socialism or Scientific Socialism[24], is an economically far-left and (most of the time) culturally progressive ideology and political philosophy that is based on the analysis and ideology of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, and looks to achieve a communist (stateless, classless, moneyless) society. According to Marx and Engels, in a communist society, nationality[25], bourgeois families[26], private property, commodities, division of labor[25], cities and countryside, religion, ideology, and markets would be abolished or become obsolete and fade away. Communism operates on the principle "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need". Marxists believe that due to inherent contradictions in the capitalist mode of productions, material conditions will become so bad that there will be a proletarian revolution that creates a Dictatorship of the Proletariat that transitions to a socialist/ communist society.

    He believes that the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles, and history can be viewed in stages of development based on which class holds a dictatorship over the other classes, and that today (with this stage starting around the English Civil War, 1642–1651) the world is under a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.

    While Marxism acknowledges the revolutionary role that the bourgeoisie have played in history, tying all corners of the world together in a global web of industry and consumption and revolutionizing the of production creating tools and machinery capable of producing far beyond the necessary requirement to sustain society, he believes that the forces of production are now constrained by the mechanics of capitalism, just as they were constrained by the mechanics of feudalism in the previous stage of development.

    On top of that, he believes that how capitalists extract surplus value from the labor of their workers creates an irreconcilable conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (working class), that can only be ended either through the overthrow of the bourgeoisie or the ruination of both classes. Following the overthrow of the bourgeoisie, Marxism believes that a "Dictatorship of the Proletariat" must be established to eradicate capitalism and begin the transition to communism. What is meant by a "Dictatorship of the Proletariat" varies depending on who you ask, but to put it simply it means a society where the working class has absolute power over all other classes, and not a literal dictatorship.

    Another thing worth noting is that Marxism does not differentiate between "socialism" or "communism" very much, calling them "lower- stage Communism" and "higher- stage Communism" respectively, and the different names for those stages is an idea that his son Leninism came up with. What is consistent, however, is that both communism and socialism are stateless and classless, with only the Dictatorship of the Proletariat, preceding both, requiring a "commune state" akin to the Paris Commune at most. The only times he differentiates between the two is when referring to socialist tendencies he disagrees with, such as "Petty-Bourgeois socialism" or "reactionary socialism".

    Etymology

    (here go the names and aliases of the ideology in a bulleted list explaining their etymology)

    History

    (gives a short overview of the history)

    Influenced by

    (gives a explanation by what ideologies the ideology was influenced by and how it was influenced by that ideology)

    Foreign Influence

    (gives a explanation of foreign influence the ideology has had)

    A sketch by Fredrich Engels of the young Hegelians.

    Before Marxism

    Prior to the start of 'proto-Marxism', the concept of proto-communism was somewhat popular in the form of Primitive Communism as many early Marxists took inspiration from primitive societies and the two concepts functioned similarly.

    Proto-Marxists can be found in the 'Young Hegelian' school. The Young Hegelians, also known as the Left Hegelians or the Hegelian Left was a group of German intellectuals who, in the decade or so after the death of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel in 1831, reacted to and wrote about his ambiguous legacy. Often expanding on the idea of a 'dialectic'. This is where dialectical materialism find's its roots, particularly in the works of Ludwig Feuerbach. The Young Hegelians drew on Hegel's idea that the purpose and promise of history was the total negation of everything conducive to restricting freedom and reason; and they proceeded to mount radical critiques, first of religion and then of the Prussian political system. They rejected anti-utopian aspects of his thought that "Old Hegelians" had interpreted to mean that the world has already essentially reached perfection.

    However, Marx later became disillusioned with many of the Young Hegelians. He and Fredrich Engels would go on to co-write The Holy Family, and The German Ideology as a critique of the Young Hegelians. The latter majorly consists of a refutation of Max Stirner's "Der Einzige und Sein Eigentum", which allowed Marx to abandon the Young Hegelian concept of humanism for his 'Dialectical Materialism'.

    Some of the many other influences on Marxism can be found in classical economics such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo who created the labor theory of value (LTV), and the " utopian socialists" such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Étienne Cabet, Henri de Saint-Simon.

    Prior to the publishing of the Communist Manifesto, Marx himself was into the philosophy of Epicurus.

    Marx and Engels

    In 1844, on the way to Germany, Fredrich Engels stopped in Paris to meet Karl Marx, with whom he had an earlier correspondence. Marx had been living in Paris since late October 1843, after the Rheinische Zeitung was banned in March 1843 by Prussian governmental authorities. Prior to meeting Marx, Engels had become established as a fully developed materialist and scientific socialist, independent of Marx's philosophical development.

    A depiction of Marx and Engels writing.

    In Paris, Marx was publishing the Deutsch–Französische Jahrbücher. Engels met Marx for a second time at the Café de la Régence on the Place du Palais, 28 August 1844. The two quickly became close friends and remained so their entire lives, cowriting staples of Marxist literature such as The Communist Manifesto, The German Ideology, Anti-Dühring, and many more. Engels actually provided the funding for a substantial amount of Marx's work as Engels was born into a wealthy family with deep roots in the yarn and cloth industry.

    First International

    Following the January Uprising in Poland in 1863, French and British workers started to develop a closer working relationship. Hénri Tolain, Joseph Perrachon and Charles Limousin visited London in July 1863, attending a meeting in St. James's Hall in honour of the uprising. They discussed the need for an international organisation, which would amongst other things prevent the import of foreign workers to break strikes. In September 1864, French and British delegates met in the capital again, this time to set up an organisation that would share labor information across borders. This organisation was known as the International Workingmen's Association.

    The International Workingmen's Association (IWA), often referred to as the "First International" (1864–1876), was an international organization which aimed at uniting a variety of different left-wing socialist, communist and anarchist groups and trade unions that were based around the working class and class struggle. Its first official congress was held in 1866 in Geneva.

    A depiction of the founding of the First International.

    Due to the wide variety of philosophies present in the First International, there was conflict from the start. The first objections to Marx's influence came from the mutualists, who opposed communism and statism. However, shortly after Mikhail Bakunin and his followers (called collectivists while in the International) joined in 1868, the First International became polarized into two camps, with Marx and Bakunin as their respective figureheads. Perhaps the clearest differences between the groups emerged over their proposed strategies for achieving their visions of socialism. The anarchists grouped around Bakunin favored (in Peter Kropotkin's words) ‘‘direct economical struggle against capitalism, without interfering in the political parliamentary agitation’’. Marxist thinking at that time focused on parliamentary activity. For example, when the new German Empire of 1871 introduced male suffrage, many German socialists became active in the Social Democratic Party of Germany.

    In Europe, a period of harsh reaction followed the widespread Revolutions of 1848. The next major phase of revolutionary activity began almost twenty years later with the founding of the IWA in 1864. At its peak, the IWA reported having 8 million members while police reported 5 million. In 1872, it split in two over conflicts between Marxist and anarchist factions and dissolved in 1876. The Second International was founded in 1889.

    Paris Commune

    The Paris Commune was the main insurrectionary commune of France in 1870-1871, based on direct democracy and established in Paris from 18 March to 28 May 1871.

    A photo of the Paris Commune.

    During the events of the Franco-Prussian War, Paris had been defended by the National Guard, where working class radicalism grew among soldiers. In March 1871, during the establishment of the Third Republic under French chief executive Adolphe Thiers, soldiers of the National Guard seized control of the city and then refused to accept the authority of the French government, instead attempting to establish an independent government.

    The Commune governed Paris for two months, establishing policies that tended toward a progressive, anti-religious system of social democracy, including the separation of church and state, self-policing, the remission of rent during the siege, the abolition of child labor, and the right of employees to take over an enterprise deserted by its owner. Feminist, socialist, and anarchist currents played important roles in the Commune. However, they had very little time to achieve their respective goals.

    The Commune was eventually suppressed by the national French Army during La semaine sanglante ("The Bloody Week") beginning on 21 May 1871. Between 6,000 and 7,000 Communards are confirmed to have been killed in battle or executed, though some unconfirmed estimates are as high as 20,000. The Archbishop of Paris, Georges Darboy, and other hostages were shot by the Commune in retaliation. Debates over the policies and outcome of the Commune had a significant influence on the ideas of Karl Marx and Frederich Engels, who described it as the first example of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

    Second International

    After the dissolution of the First International in 1876, the Second International was formed years later in 1889. Much like the First, it was an organization of socialist and labor parties, formed on 14 July 1889 at two simultaneous Paris meetings in which delegations from twenty countries participated. The Second International continued the work of the dissolved First International, though excluding the powerful anarcho-syndicalist movement. While the international had initially declared its opposition to all warfare between European powers, most of the major European parties ultimately chose to support their respective states in the First World War. After splitting into pro-Allied, pro-Central Powers, and antimilitarist factions, the international ceased to function. After the war, the remaining factions of the international went on to found the Labor and Socialist International, the International Working Union of Socialist Parties, and the Communist International.

    October Revolution and Soviet Union

    In November 7, 1917. The communists had started taking over Petrograd, including many other areas. Alexander Kerensky also fled form Petrograd to Pskov, before they were going to take over the city, so he was not captured by the Red Army. Before the Red Army was going to take Pskov when Alexander Kerensky told troops to re-take the city, Kerensky fled to France, which later Pskov was seized to the Reds.

    A couple of days later after November 7, Moscow was taken. It would later be the capital of the Russian SFSR in March 1918...

    Third International

    the Third International, was an international organization founded in 1919 that advocated world communism, controlled by the Soviet Union. The Comintern resolved at its Second Congress to "struggle by all available means, including armed force, for the overthrow of the international bourgeoisie and the creation of an international Soviet republic as a transition stage to the complete abolition of the state". The Comintern was preceded by the 1916 dissolution of the Second International.

    Peak

    (this section is about the ideology and the peak of its intellectual, ideological strength and the height of its popularity)

    General History 3

    (here goes the general history of the ideology stuff that does not fit into the proto, origin, peak, downfall and modern section)

    General History 4

    (here goes the general history of the ideology stuff that does not fit into the proto, origin, peak, downfall and modern section)

    General History etc

    (goes on for as long as it needs to go on for)

    Downfall

    (this section is about the eventual downfall of the ideology and what has caused this downfall)

    Modern

    (how the ideology is doing in the modern day and what its current standing as a movement is)

    Influenced

    (which ideologies this ideology has influenced and how it influenced them)

    Examples

    IRL Examples

    (irl examples of the actual ideology happening in real life)

    Fictional Examples

    (fictional examples of the ideology happening in fiction)

    Comparisons

    parallels to insert ideology

    (similar ideologies to the ideology and the parallels it has)

    parallels to insert movement

    (similar movements to the ideology and the parallels it has)

    Intellectuals

    Main Intellectual

    (this section talks about the most important intellectual to the movement)

    Intellectual etc.

    (this section talks about less important but still critical people, it is numbered and goes on for however long it needs to go on for)

    Foundations and Beliefs

    Communism

    Communism redirects here. For other uses, see Communism (Disambiguation).

    To Marx, a communist society is the solution to the riddle of history and knows itself to be the solution. It is a system where the productive forces became so advanced that a post-scarcity economy emerges as the result, where all the aspects of capitalism (money, state, classes, commodities, markets, family structure, etc) have been abolished. The means of production are owned in common, and individuals have free access to consumer goods based on needs. They're also free to pursue their own interests, making this system highly individualistic.

    Materialist dialectics

    Materialist dialectics is a method of analysis developed by the works of Friedrich Engels. It has three main laws: Transformation of quantity into quality: The great basic thought that the world is not to be comprehended as a complex of ready-made things, but a complex of processes, in which things apparently stable…, go through an uninterrupted change of coming into being and passing away. The transformation of quantity into quality=“mechanical” world outlook, quantitative change alters quality.

    The unity of opposites: Objects and processes in nature are composed of paired "opposites". Example:we have positive and negative electric charges, the North and South magnetic poles, male and female organisms, and so on.

    Negation of the negation: When something ceases to be, it is "negated". However, this negation emerges into something brand new, something higher than before.

    Law of value

    The core theory of the law of value is that the value of a commodity is determined by the socially necessary (this is actually a subjective judgment) labor time put into it. Rejecting the idea of labor being the source of all wealth, the theory says that nature is an equally important contributor to wealth as labor. According to the law, homogeneous human labour, expenditure of one uniform labour power is the form of labour that forms the substance of value. The value of one commodity is to the value of any other, as the labour time necessary for the production of the one is to that necessary for the production of the other.

    Exploitation Theory

    The exploitation theory is the theory that profit is the result of the exploitation of wage earners by their employers. It rests on the law of value which claims that value is intrinsic in a product according to the amount of labor that has been spent on producing the product.

    Worker Alienation

    Karl Marx's theory of alienation describes the social alienation of people from aspects of their human nature as a consequence of living in a society of stratified social classes. The alienation from the self is a consequence of being a mechanistic part of a social class, the condition of which estranges a person from their humanity.

    Base and Superstructure

    In Marxist theory, society consists of two parts: the base (or substructure) and superstructure. The base comprises the forces and relations of production (e.g. employer-employee work conditions, the technical division of labour, and property relations) into which people enter to produce the necessities and amenities of life. The superstructure determines society's other relationships and ideas to comprise its superstructure, including its culture, institutions, political power structures, roles, rituals, and state. The relation of the two parts is not strictly unidirectional, Marx and Engels warned against such economic determinism as the superstructure can affect the base. However the influence of the base is predominant.

    Materialist conception of history

    Historical materialism is a theory ultimately determining element in history is the production and reproduction of real life(think of the economy). The theory posits that the sum of productive forces, capital funds and social forms of intercourse, which every individual and generation finds in existence as something given, is the real basis of our ideas.

    Workers' Revolution and Dictatorship of the Proletariat

    Marxism believes that before a communist society can develop, a state in which the workers are the ones in power must be created. This is called a "Dictatorship of the proletariat" which refers to the absolute authority of the working class, not of an individual.

    Early on, Marx and Engels thought that the working class could take the existing state machinery and wield it in order to create the Dictatorship of the proletariat, (as was said in the communist manifesto), but after the Paris Commune Marx changed his mind, now believing that the working class could not simply lay hold of the existing state machinery.

    It is as a result that Marxism is usually revolutionary.

    Views on Religion

    Marx viewed religion as "the soul of soulless conditions" or the "opium of the people". According to Karl Marx, religion in this world of exploitation is an expression of distress and at the same time it is also a protest against the real distress. In other words, religion continues to survive because of oppressive social conditions. When this oppressive and exploitative condition is destroyed, religion will become unnecessary. At the same time, Marx saw religion as a form of protest by the working classes against their poor economic conditions and their alienation. Some Marxist scholars have classified Marx's views as adhering to Post-Theism, a philosophical position that regards worshipping deities as an eventually obsolete, but temporarily necessary, stage in humanity's historical spiritual development. Marx's views adhere to Post-Theism most likely because he wanted to compete with the established religion in Germany (predominantly Christianity) to disseminate pro-worker social teachings.

    Phases of communism

    Lower Phase Communism

    Lower-phase communism (or socialism by Lenin) is the transitional stage between the dictatorship of the proletariat and higher-phase communism. During this phase, remnants of capitalist society, such as unequal distribution and quasi-Markets, may still exist. One of the mechanisms often associated with lower-phase communism is the use of labor vouchers to organize the distribution of goods and services, they’re a system of non-monetary exchange where individuals receive vouchers in proportion to the amount of labor they contribute, Unlike money, labor vouchers cannot be traded, saved indefinitely, or used for accumulation(they act like a ticket to a sport match). Subsequent to the abolishment of monetary exchange,the concept of socioeconomic class is rendered null. Taking everything into account,Lower phase communism is a moneyless,stateless,Classes society, with a material incentive for labour

    Higher Phase Communism

    Higher-phase Communism epitomizes the ultimate aspiration of Marxist theory: a classless, stateless society where all forms of currency are eradicated, thereby dissolving all class distinctions. In this envisioned society, labor is fully decommodified and becomes voluntary, serving as a medium for self-actualization rather than survival or exploitation. Monetary compensation is replaced by Marx’s foundational principle: “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.”

    Framework

    (this section puts all the beliefs into a larger cohesive framework and makes them mix with each other)

    Misc

    (random stuff that doesn't fit in any of those categories)

    Variants

    Internal conflicts in ideology

    (this section is for conflicts members of the ideology have often had with each other)

    Factions in Ideology

    (these are the general positions members in the ideology take i.e. some take a more conservative line)

    Sub-Ideologies

    Sub-Ideology 1

    (this section is for explaining the component ideologies)

    Sub-Ideology 2

    (this section is for explaining the component ideologies)

    Sub-Ideology etc

    (goes on as long as it needs to)

    Schools of Thought

    Leninism

    Leninism is a political ideology developed by Russian Marxist revolutionary Vladimir Lenin that proposes the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat led by a revolutionary vanguard party, as the political prelude to the establishment of communism. The function of the Leninist vanguard party is to provide the working classes with the political consciousness (education and organisation) and revolutionary leadership necessary to depose capitalism in the Russian Empire (1721–1917). Leninist revolutionary leadership is based upon The Communist Manifesto (1848) identifying the communist party as "the most advanced and resolute section of the working class parties of every country; that section which pushes forward all others." As the vanguard party, the Bolsheviks viewed history through the theoretical framework of dialectical materialism, which sanctioned political commitment to the successful overthrow of capitalism, and then to instituting socialism; and, as the revolutionary national government, to realize the socio-economic transition by all means.

    Marxism–Leninism

    Marxism–Leninism is a communist ideology which was the main communist movement throughout the 20th century. It was the formal name of the official state ideology adopted by the Soviet Union, its satellite states in the Eastern Bloc, and various self-declared scientific socialist regimes in the Non-Aligned Movement and Third World during the Cold War as well as the Communist International after Bolshevisation. Today, Marxism–Leninism is the ideology of many communist parties. Generally, Marxist–Leninists support proletarian internationalism and socialist democracy, and oppose anarchism, fascism, imperialism, and liberal democracy. Marxism–Leninism holds that a two-stage communist revolution is needed to replace capitalism. A vanguard party, organised hierarchically through democratic centralism, would seize power "on behalf of the proletariat", and establish a communist party-led socialist state, which it claims to represent the dictatorship of the proletariat. The state controls the economy and means of production, suppresses the bourgeoisie, counter-revolution, and opposition, promotes collectivism in society, and paves the way for an eventual communist society, which would be both classless and stateless.

    Trotskyism

    Trotskyism, also known as "Bolshevik-Leninism", is the political ideology and branch of Marxism developed by Ukrainian-Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky and by some other members of the Left Opposition and Fourth International. Trotsky self-identified as an orthodox Marxist, a revolutionary Marxist, and Bolshevik–Leninist, a follower of Marx, Engels, and of 3L: Lenin, Karl Liebknecht, Rosa Luxemburg. He supported founding a vanguard party of the proletariat, proletarian internationalism, and a dictatorship of the proletariat (as opposed to the “dictatorship of the bourgeoisie” which Marxists argue defines capitalism) based on working class self-emancipation and mass democracy. Trotskyists are critical of Marx-Leninism as they oppose Joseph Stalin's theory of socialism in one country in favor of Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution. Trotskyists also criticize the bureaucracy and anti-democratic current that developed in the Soviet Union under Stalin.

    Maoism

    Maoism, officially called Mao Zedong Thought (Chinese: 毛泽东思想; pinyin: Máo Zédōng sīxiǎng) by the Communist Party of China, is a variety of Marxism–Leninism that Mao Zedong developed for realising a socialist revolution in the agricultural, pre-industrial society of the Republic of China and later the People's Republic of China. The philosophical difference between Maoism and traditional Marxism–Leninism is that the peasantry are the revolutionary vanguard in pre-industrial societies rather than the proletariat. This updating and adaptation of Marxism–Leninism to Chinese conditions in which revolutionary praxis is primary and ideological orthodoxy is secondary represents urban Marxism–Leninism adapted to pre-industrial China. The claim that Mao Zedong had adapted Marxism–Leninism to Chinese conditions evolved into the idea that he had updated it in a fundamental way applying to the world as a whole. Another fundamental difference between Marxism-Leninism and Maoism is that traditional Marxist-Leninists support the idea that basic contradiction in imperialist relations of production is singular, while Maoists see it as multiple contradictions.

    Western Marxism

    Neo-Marxism is a Marxist school of thought encompassing 20th-century approaches that amend or extend Marxism and Marxist theory, typically by incorporating elements from other intellectual traditions such as critical theory, psychoanalysis, or existentialism (in the case of Jean-Paul Sartre).

    As with many uses of the prefix neo-, some theorists and groups who are designated as neo-Marxists have attempted to supplement the perceived deficiencies of orthodox Marxism or dialectical materialism. Many prominent neo-Marxists, such as Herbert Marcuse and other members of the Frankfurt School, have historically been sociologists and psychologists.

    Neo-Marxism comes under the broader framework of the New Left. In a sociological sense, neo-Marxism adds Max Weber's broader understanding of social inequality, such as status and power, to Marxist philosophy. Examples of neo-Marxism include analytical Marxism, French structural Marxism, critical theory, cultural studies, as well as some forms of feminism. Erik Olin Wright's theory of contradictory class locations is an example of the syncretism found in neo-Marxist thought, as it incorporates Weberian sociology, critical criminology, and anarchism.

    Frankfurt School

    The Frankfurt School (German: Frankfurter Schule) was a school of social theory and critical philosophy associated with the Institute for Social Research, at Goethe University Frankfurt in 1929. Founded in the Weimar Republic (1918–1933), during the European interwar period (1918–1939), the Frankfurt School comprised intellectuals, academics, and political dissidents dissatisfied with the contemporary socio-economic systems (capitalist, fascist, communist) of the 1930s. The Frankfurt theorists proposed that social theory was inadequate for explaining the turbulent political factionalism and reactionary politics occurring in 20th-century liberal capitalist societies. Critical of both capitalism and of Marxism–Leninism as philosophically inflexible systems of social organization, the School's critical theory research indicated alternative paths to realizing the social development of a society and a nation.

    Structural Marxism

    Structuralist Marxism disputes the instrumentalist view that the state can be viewed as the direct servant of the capitalist or ruling class. Whereas the instrumentalist position is that the institutions of the state are under the direct control of those members of the capitalist class in positions of state power, the structuralist position is that state institutions must function to ensure the viability of capitalism more generally. In other words, state institutions must reproduce capitalist society as a whole.

    Structuralists view the state in a capitalist mode of production as taking a specifically capitalist form, not because particular individuals are in powerful positions, but because the state reproduces the logic of capitalist structure in its economic, legal, and political institutions. Hence, from a structuralist perspective, one would argue that state institutions (including legal ones) function in the long-term interests of capital and capitalism, rather than in the short-term interests of members of the capitalist class. Thus the state and its institutions have a certain degree of independence from specific elites in the ruling or capitalist class.

    Situationism

    The Situationist International (SI) was an international organization of social revolutionaries made up of avant-garde artists, intellectuals, and political theorists. It was prominent in Europe from its formation in 1957 to its dissolution in 1972. Overall, situationist theory represented an attempt to synthesize this diverse field of theoretical disciplines into a modern and comprehensive critique of mid-20th century advanced capitalism.

    Essential to situationist theory was the concept of the spectacle, a unified critique of advanced capitalism of which a primary concern was the progressively increasing tendency towards the expression and mediation of social relations through objects. The situationists believed that the shift from individual expression through directly lived experiences, or the first-hand fulfilment of authentic desires, to individual expression by proxy through the exchange or consumption of commodities, or passive second-hand alienation, inflicted significant and far-reaching damage to the quality of human life for both individuals and society. Another important concept of situationist theory was the primary means of counteracting the spectacle; the construction of situations, moments of life deliberately constructed for the purpose of reawakening and pursuing authentic desires, experiencing the feeling of life and adventure, and the liberation of everyday life.

    Left Communism

    Left communism, or the communist left, is a position held by the left wing of communism, which criticizes the political ideas and practices espoused by Marxist–Leninists and social democrats. Left communists assert positions that they regard as more authentically Marxist than the views of Marxism–Leninism espoused by the Communist International after its Bolshevization by Joseph Stalin and during its second congress.

    In general, there are two currents of left communism, namely the Italian and Dutch–German left. The communist left in Italy was formed during World War I in organizations like the Italian Socialist Party and the Communist Party of Italy. The Italian left considers itself to be Leninist in nature, but denounces Marxism–Leninism as a form of bourgeois opportunism materialized in the Soviet Union under Stalin. The Italian left is currently embodied in organizations such as the Internationalist Communist Party and the International Communist Party. The Dutch-German left split from Vladimir Lenin before Stalin's rule and supports a firmly council communist viewpoint as opposed to the Italian left which emphasized the need for an international revolutionary party.

    Libertarian Marxism

    Libertarian Marxism is a broad scope of economic and political philosophies that emphasize the anti-authoritarian and libertarian aspects of Marxism. Early currents of libertarian Marxism such as left communism emerged in opposition to Marxism–Leninism.

    Libertarian Marxism is often critical of reformist positions such as those held by social democrats. Libertarian Marxist currents often draw from Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' later works, specifically the Grundrisse and The Civil War in France; emphasizing the Marxist belief in the ability of the working class to forge its destiny without the need for a state or vanguard party to mediate or aid its liberation. Along with anarchism, libertarian Marxism is one of the main currents of libertarian socialism.

    Revisionist Marxism

    Reformism is a political doctrine advocating the reform of an existing system or institution instead of its abolition and replacement.

    Within the socialist movement, reformism is the view that gradual changes through existing institutions can eventually lead to fundamental changes in a society's political and economic systems. Reformism as a political tendency and hypothesis of social change grew out of opposition to revolutionary socialism, which contends that revolutionary upheaval is a necessary precondition for the structural changes necessary to transform a capitalist system to a qualitatively different socialist system. Responding to a pejorative conception of reformism as non-transformational, non-reformist reform was conceived to prioritize human needs over capitalist needs.

    As a doctrine, centre-left reformism is distinguished from centre-right or pragmatic reform which instead aims to safeguard and permeate the status quo by preventing fundamental structural changes to it whereas leftist reformism posits that an accumulation of reforms can eventually lead to the emergence of entirely different economic and political systems than those of present-day capitalism and bureaucracy.

    Post-Marxism

    Post-Marxism is a trend in political philosophy and social theory that deconstructs Karl Marx's writings and Marxism proper, bypassing orthodox Marxism. The term post-Marxism first appeared in Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe's theoretical work Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. It can be said that post-Marxism as a political theory was developed at the University of Essex by Laclau and Mouffe. Philosophically, post-Marxism counters derivationism and essentialism (for example, it does not see the economy as a foundation of politics and the state as an instrument that functions unambiguously and autonomously on behalf of the interests of a given class). Ernesto Screpanti, Göran Therborn, and Gregory Meyerson provide recent overviews of post-Marxism.


    Regional Tendencies

    Regional Tendency 1

    (this is for explaing different regional interpretations of the ideology)

    Regional Tendency 2

    (this is for explaing different regional interpretations of the ideology)

    Regional Tendency etc

    (goes on as long as it needs to)

    Personality and Behaviour

    Marxism will usually be portrayed as an amalgamation of Communist archetypes, and of the personality of Karl Marx himself. He will also occasionally be seen educating his various children and the socialist family in general on theory and philosophy.

    How it acts

    (how the ideology reacts to other ideologies generally)

    Aesthetics

    (the general aesthetics of the ideology)

    Stylistic Notes

    (generally small facts about the ideologies behaviour or looks)

    How to draw

    Symbols

    (symbols the ideology has)

    Flags

    Flag of Marxism

    Props

    \

    [!] Note: While most designs on Polcompball are forbidden to have hair by community rules, Marxism has become an exception.

    Drawing

    Marxismball
    1. Draw a ball
    2. Color the ball Navy Red
    3. On the ball, draw a long puffy Gray beard extending from the ball's bottom, and turning into balding hair on top
    4. Add a Dark Grey mustache on the front of the ball
    5. Draw two eyes
    6. (Optional) Give the ball a "Communist Manifesto"

    You are done!

    Color NameHEXRGB
     Navy Red#C1272Drgb(193, 39, 45)
     Dark Gray#2C2C2Crgb(44, 44, 44)
     Grey#7F7F7Frgb(127, 127, 127)


    Alternatively:

    1. Draw a ball
    2. Color the ball red
    3. Draw a silhouette of Karl Marx's head using black, as seen on the flag design
    4. Add two eyes

    You're done!

    Color NameHEXRGB
     Red#DE0000rgb(222, 0, 0)
     Black#141414rgb(20, 20, 20)

    Alternate Designs

    Marxismball (Alternative)
    1. Draw a ball with eyes.
    2. Draw a silhouette of Marx's head. The face and beard should be outlined in grey, with the mustache a darker grey.
    3. Make the remaining skin of the ball deep red.

    You're done!

    Color NameHEXRGB
     Deep Red#ED1D26rgb(237, 29, 38)
     Dark Grey#2C2C2Crgb(44, 44, 44)
     Grey#7F7F7Frgb(127, 127, 127)

    Variation Designs

    (guides of the variant designs)

    Relationships

    Proletariat

    • Sozialismus - Father knows best. Many of you are semi-lumpenproletariat or petty bourgeoisie who are not committed to a communist society, but we must put that aside for now.
    • Industrialismus - Socialism requires an industrial society.
    • Ergatokratie - A Dictatorship of the Proletariat will carry the revolution until class relations are abolished and communism is reached.
    • Internationalismus - The plight of the proletarian knows no borders.
    • Klassische Sozialdemokratie - You carry my ideas so well! If only the Spartacist revolt had been successful...
    • Ratskommunismus - Very similar to what I became in my later years, good stuff.
    • Libertärer Marxismus - Same as above.
    • De Leonismus - My industrial unionist son in America.
    • Babouvismus - My inspiration!
    • Beschleunigungismus - Progressing capitalism to its breaking point to motivate the working class to revolt is a brilliant idea!
    • Revolutionärer Progressivismus - Bourgeois society must be done away with if the proletariat is to be liberated!
    • Situationismus - An unconventional grandnephew of mine who uses fancy language and criticizes consumerism. I'm not quite sure what he's saying, but he seems reasonable.
    • Agrarindustrialismus - "Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country."
    • Pan-Germanism - The unification of Germany will set the stage for the establishment of socialism.
    • Abolitionism - Freeing the slaves will increase the number of the working class, thus improving the chances of a successful revolution.
    • Scientocratie - My analysis of capitalism is highly scientific, hence “scientific socialism”.
    • Contrarianismus - I am no dogmatist. In fact, according to some I don’t exist as a philosophy. My main strength lies in my ability to criticize the status quo, or “Ruthless criticism of all that exists”.

    Lumpenproletariat

    • Anarchismus - We both agree that the state is bad and should eventually be abolished, but the revolution needs a transitional period, and we disagree on what the state even is.
    • Anarcho-Kommunismus - I respect your desire to overthrow capitalism, but a revolution needs a temporary dictatorship of the proletariat. And why do you like B*kunin? Liking both me and him is contradictory. Ignore the fact that I’m basically just you with extra steps.
    • Staatssozialismus - Speaking of such, a transitional state is needed in order to fully achieve communism, but should wither away once it is done, also though Engels may have liked you, many of my followers hate you.
    • Hegelianism - Thanks for inspiring Dialectical and Historical Materialism, but I'm not interested at all in Absolute idealism.
    • Leninismus - Marx would have considered your ideas strange and heterodox, and some of me think are no better than Blanqui, but if it works it works, I suppose.
    • Marxismus–Leninismus - Same as above, and you remind me a bit of him. I hear you also got ideas from that Mao? Anyway, you did a... job of expanding on my theories I suppose.
    • Maoismus - "In fact, agricultural communism, which was left over from clan society, never gave rise to anything other than its own disintegration anywhere or at any time. ... It is historically impossible for a lower stage of economic development to resolve problems and conflicts that only a much higher stage of development can produce and resolve." Your means to succeed communism by the revolution of the marginalized (or to be more blunt, lumpenproletariat revolution) and industrialization of rural society makes me confused. Somehow you want to maintain a class collaboration with "national bourgeoisie"? And please don't use nietzschean rhetoric.
    • Neomarxismus - Good job expanding on my theories. Though you are rather liberal, and to be frank, water down my work.
    • Reformistischer Marxismus and Demokratischer Sozialismus - Although I call myself a "democratic socialist", many of you have a very shallow and ridiculous understanding of communism. I support proletarian revolution in any form, but that doesn't mean I can change my attitude towards you.
    • Klassischer Liberalismus - Bourgeois ideology, but good job of unleashing the 1848 revolutions as my ideas can now be practiced in Europe.
    • Syndikalismus - The proletariat cannot recapture the value of their labor by virtue of purely economic means if they want to seize power in the nation-state. What is more, your insights into economic relations are based on a dangerous foundation, namely, a wage system that supports the exploitation of its own. In short, my successors have well articulated my critique of you.
    • Lincolnismus - I wrote to congratulate you on your election victory. Good job on getting rid of slavery, though you were too moderate. Shame you got assassinated before you could really enjoy peacetime.
    • Ricardianischer Sozialismus - Massive influence on me and modern socialism in general, but I don't know about markets, and labor isn't the source of all wealth.
    • Agrarsozialismus - It is absurd to try to improve on a small peasant society that is self-sufficient, segregated and conservative. Such an agrarian society would not be rich in productive relations, nor would the peasants form a fixed class to defend their rights. But if you submit to the interests of the urban proletariat, i.e., the elimination of the urban-rural divide, then I am not so bad for you. You helped at least two of my grandchildren through the revolution.
    • Utopischer Sozialismus - “The materialist conception of history starts from the proposition that the production of the means to support human life and, next to production, the exchange of things produced, is the basis of all social structure; that in every society that has appeared in history, the manner in which wealth is distributed and society divided into classes or orders is dependent upon what is produced, how it is produced, and how the products are exchanged. From this point of view, the final causes of all social changes and political revolutions are to be sought, not in men’s brains, not in men’s better insights into eternal truth and justice, but in changes in the modes of production and exchange.”
    • Islamischer Sozialismus - "Muhammad was a man who... rose from among the pagan people with an iron will and invited them to monotheism and instilled in their hearts the immortality of the soul and spirit. Therefore, he should not only be counted among the great and prominent men of history, but also deserve to acknowledge his prophethood and say from the heart that he was the prophet of God." (Book of opinions of Western scholars about Muhammad, page 101)
    • Kapitalistischer Kommunismus - Uhhhh... I don't care to explain.
    • Kasernenkommunismus - You are too bureaucratic and fixated on asceticism.
    • Linker Nationalismus & Nationaler Kommunismus - "The working men have no country. We cannot take what they do not have. Since the proletariat must, first of all, acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must constitute itself the nation, it is so far, itself national, though not in the bourgeois sense of the word."
    • Ho-Chi-Minh-Gedanke - Same as above. Sure, a nationalist revolution is better than no revolution, but an explicitly international revolution is much better.
    • Anarcho-Egoismus - Saint Max, helped me break away from idealism. But I wrote the German ideology specifically for you.
    • Posadismus - Say that again, grandson? Aliens? Nukes? Wait, what?!
    • Bio-Posadismus - Worldwide revolution isn´t outdated, and you think instead of that communists should release a super-virus that wipes out the majority of human population for collapsing global capitalist system? Well... Ok then.
    • Nationalbolschewismus - Uses my ideas, but for absolutely the wrong purposes.
    • Pol Potismus - What do you mean you are me without ever fully reading my books?
    • Blanquismus - Fake socialist elitist who doesn't care about the proletariat. But I later thought that you were the leader the Paris Commune was missing all along.
    • Kanzler Bismarck - There is no doubt that you are reactionary, but you have unified Germany, and this is very important to me. But other than that, you're just a minister who takes a shameless approach to the working class.

    Bourgeoisie

    • Kapitalismus - A system built off of the pain, exploitation and oppression of the proletariat that has overstayed its welcome over Feudalism. I live to destroy you. You will implode someday!
    • Feudalismus - Fuck off and and never return!
    • Georgismus - “All these 'socialists' since Colins have this much in common that they leave wage labour and therefore capitalist production in existence and try to bamboozle themselves or the world into believing that if ground rent were transformed into a state tax all the evils of capitalist production would disappear of themselves. The whole thing is therefore simply an attempt, decked out with socialism, to save capitalist domination and indeed to establish it afresh on an even wider basis than its present one.”
    • Neoliberalismus - The global dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.
    • Dritter Weg, Sozialer Kapitalismus, Sozialliberalismus, etc. - "I cAn TotAlLY ChAnGe cApITaLiSm i SwEaR!!1" Stop diverting support from me with your welfare and basic worker rights. No matter how much you reform the system, the oppressive boundaries of capitalism will remain.
    • Sozialdemokratie - You are a disgrace to the family. Not only do you undermine me by saving capitalism, but you murdered my granddaughter. You are hereby disowned, you bourgeois traitor. Also, Lassalle was a Jewish [REDACTED].
    • Sozialer Autoritarismus - The worship of an exploitative system of social welfare cannot affect your servile belief in the state.
    • Liberaler Sozialismus - Liberalism is the ideology of the capitalist class. You can not be a liberal and advocate for the liberation of the working class, period.
      • No, we shouldn't throw the baby of liberal ideals out with the bathwater of capitalism.
    • Bienenstock-Kollektivismus - I am not you and my ultimate goal will not be a totalitarian society.
    • Dengismus (Within China) - Revisionist poser. You betray class struggle and embrace socialistic bourgeois to promote your "Socialist Market Economy", which dissloves proletarian power and restarts bourgeois dictatorship.
    • Objektivismus - Awful! At least we are both atheists and materialists.
    • Absoluter Monarchismus - Most counter-revolutionary country in the world! Oh wait-
    • Panslawismus - You are just the tool of the counter-revolutionary Russians! Oh wait-
    • Neokonservatismus - So... why is being communist a bad thing? You seem to blow things a lot of the time out of proportion. And stop misattributing my quotes to him.
    • Pinochetismus - You killed some of my followers, sure. But that clearly doesn't measure up to any of the classicides does it?
    • Plutokratie - I don't like to strawman people, it pollutes discourse. But really?
    • Neoreaktionärismus and Neo-Aufklärung - You have created an entire system based upon exploiting the worker and acquiring as much capital as possible, and you are proud of it? Really? What do you mean, that you are tangentially influenced by me?
    • Reaktionärer Sozialismus - You forget that you, too, used to be the oppressors and the bourgeoisie exist because of you.
    • Christlicher Sozialismus - "Nothing is easier than to give Christian asceticism a Socialist tinge. Has not Christianity declaimed against private property, against marriage, against the State? Has it not preached in the place of these, charity and poverty, celibacy and mortification of the flesh, monastic life and Mother Church? Christian Socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat."
    • Kleinbürgerlicher Sozialismus - “This school of Socialism dissected with great acuteness the contradictions in the conditions of modern production. It laid bare the hypocritical apologies of economists. It proved, incontrovertibly, the disastrous effects of machinery and division of labour; the concentration of capital and land in a few hands; overproduction and crises; it pointed out the inevitable ruin of the petty bourgeois and peasant, the misery of the proletariat, the anarchy in production, the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth, the industrial war of extermination between nations, the dissolution of old moral bonds, of the old family relations, of the old nationalities. In its positive aims, however, this form of Socialism aspires either to restoring the old means of production and of exchange, and with them the old property relations, and the old society, or to cramping the modern means of production and of exchange within the framework of the old property relations that have been, and were bound to be, exploded by those means. In either case, it is both reactionary and Utopian.”
    • Bürgerlicher Sozialismus - "The Socialistic bourgeois want all the advantages of modern social conditions without the struggles and dangers necessarily resulting therefrom. They desire the existing state of society, minus its revolutionary and disintegrating elements. They wish for a bourgeoisie without a proletariat. The bourgeoisie naturally conceives the world in which it is supreme to be the best; and bourgeois Socialism develops this comfortable conception into various more or less complete systems. In requiring the proletariat to carry out such a system, and thereby to march straightway into the social New Jerusalem, it but requires in reality, that the proletariat should remain within the bounds of existing society, but should cast away all its hateful ideas concerning the bourgeoisie." Just ignore how I acted conservatively towards people who wanted an immediate revolution
    • Hayekismus - An idiot who doesn't understand the difference between price and value.
    • Bürgerlicher Nationalismus - Actively divides the working class!
    • Autoritärer Kapitalismus - A dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, and doesn't even attempt to hide it behind liberal rhetoric.
    • Rechtspopulismus - Can you stop with all the conspiracy theories about how I'm corrupting the West? My ideas won't ever influence the bourgeois elite, they are my nemesis.
    • Nationalsozialismus - Reactionary racialist bourgeois, for you to call yourself a socialist is a travesty. History is about class, not race!
    • Anarcho-Kollektivismus - Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? "Bakunin has become a monster, a huge mass of flesh and fat, and is barely capable of walking any more. To crown it all, he is sexually perverse and jealous of the seventeen year-old Polish girl who married him in Siberia because of his martyrdom. He is presently in Sweden, where he is hatching ‘revolution’ with the Finns."
    • Englischer Sozialismus - You have brought shame to the workers of this country by opposing everything I have. You’re not even a socialist just by using its name. Your despotism has ruined the ideals of socialism. You monopolise and consolidate power through the bourgeoisie elite under the guise of egalitarianism, wiping out every chance of a decision-making process and you exploit the proletariat to your own gain. Your manipulation of truth and information is a direct threat for our revolutionary spirit for emancipation and intellectual integrity. Your repression and surveillance is only used for controlling the masses, removing every chance of human emancipation. By opposing you, we stand to the commitment of freedom, justice and equality, untouched and unshackled by your barbaric despotism.

    Bibliography

    Literature

    Primary Literature

    Marx & Engels
    Insert intellectual 1

    (here goes a list of literature from a more minor intellectual of the movement)

    Insert intellectual 2

    (here goes a list of literature from a more minor intellectual of the movement)

    Collection of Literature

    Secondary Literature

    Periodicals

    (here goes a list of publications and journals the ideology had)

    News

    (here goes a list of news about the movement)

    Mainstream News

    (here goes a list of news from the mainstream about the ideology)

    Interviews

    (here goes a list of interviews of people in the movement)

    Quotes

    "The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of the world, unite!"

    Further Reading

    Misc Texts

    (texts that do not fit into any of these categories)

    Further Information

    For overlapping political theory see:

    Leninism, Marxism–Leninism, Maoism, Marxism–Leninism–Maoism, Trotskyism, Italian Left Communism, & Anarcho-Communism

    Websites

    Wikipedia

    Online Communities

    (here go online communities of the movement)

    Subreddits

    (here goes subreddits of the movement)

    Videos

    Channels

    People

    Organizations

    Political Parties

    (here go political parties of the movement)

    Groups

    (here go groups which are a part of the movement)

    Misc

    (here go goes stuff that doesn't fit in any of the categories)

    See also

    (a list of links to more information)

    Gallery

    Comics

    Portraits

    Portraits of Variants

    (here go portraits of the variants of the ideology)

    Portraits of Alternate Designs

    Compasses

    Citations

    Notes

    References

    1. 'Scientific socialism'... was only used in opposition to utopian socialism, which wants to attach the people to new delusions, instead of limiting its science to the knowledge of the social movement made by the people itself; see my text against Proudhon.
    2. The Communist Manifesto (1848), Section II: Proletarians and Communists: "Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country."
    3. https://www.factcheck.org/2019/09/marx-engels-quote-falsely-attributed-to-reagan/
    4. The Communist Manifesto (1848), Section II: Proletarians and Communists: "Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country."
    5. "Thus, in The Essence of Christianity, he regards only theoretical activity as truly human activity, while practice is understood and determined only in its unclean Jewish expression." —Theses on Feuerbach, Karl Marx
    6. "Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew. Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money[...] An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible[...] The Jew has emancipated himself in a Jewish manner, not only because he has acquired financial power, but also because, through him and also apart from him, money has become a world power and the practical Jewish spirit has become the practical spirit of the Christian nations. The Jews have emancipated themselves insofar as the Christians have become Jews[...] Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man – and turns them into commodities[...] The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange[...] The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general." —On the Jewish question, Karl Marx
    7. "If there were a social organization that eliminated the presupposition, and thus the possibility, of making a profit in business, it would also make the existence of the Jewish people impossible. His religious consciousness would disappear like a faint haze in the real, life-necessary air of society. If, on the other hand, the Jew admits that this actual essence of himself is worthless and works for its elimination, he is freed from his previous development, works directly for the emancipation of man, and turns against the highest practical expression of man's self-alienation. In short, we see in Judaism the general modern anti-social element, which, through historical development with the enthusiastic participation of the Jews in this bad aspect, has reached its present height, that is, to the height of its inevitable disintegration. The liberation of the Jewish people, in its ultimate sense, is the liberation of humanity from the Jewish spirit. The Jews have liberated themselves in the Jewish way."—"On the Jewish question", Karl Marx
    8. "The cunning tactics of the Jews, [...] It is the relation of the selfish world to the laws that govern it, and the cunning evasion of these laws is the chief trick of the world. [...]. Because the true essence of the Jew has been universally realized and secularized in civil society, civil society cannot convince the Jew of the unreality of his religious essence, which is only the ideational expression of practical needs. Therefore, not only in the Torah or the Talmud, but also in modern society, we see that the essence of modern Jewry is not an abstract essence, but a highly empirical essence, which is not only the narrowness of the Jew, but the narrowness of the society Jews. [...]. The social liberation of the Jews is the liberation of society from the Jewish spirit." —"On the Jewish question", Karl Marx
    9. Karl Marx to Engels,[London,] 25 September 1857
    10. "The Jewish NXXXXX Lassalle who, I’m glad to say, is leaving at the end of this week, has happily lost another 5,000 talers in an ill-judged speculation. The chap would sooner throw money down the drain than lend it to a ‘friend’, even though his interest and capital were guaranteed. In this he bases himself on the view that he ought to live the life of a Jewish baron, or Jew created a baron (no doubt by the countess)."—"Marx-Engels Correspondence 1862", Karl Marx
    11. "It is now quite plain to me — as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify — that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a nxxxxx). Now, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow’s importunity is also nxxxxx-like. [...] One of our nxxxxx’s great discoveries — which, however, he only confides to his ‘closest friends’ — is that the Pelasgians were of Semitic descent. The main evidence: in the Book of Maccabbees, the Jews send emissaries to solicit the help of Greece on grounds of kinship. Furthermore, an Etruscan inscription has been found in Perugia, and this was simultaneously deciphered by Hofrat Stucker in Berlin and an Italian, and both independently converted the Etruscan into the Hebrew alphabet. So that we can no longer discomfit him with ‘Blue Books’, he has bought 20 pounds’ worth of Blue Books (under Bucher’s guidance)."—Marx-Engels Correspondence 1862, Karl Marx
    12. as shown by an acerbic 1869 exchange of letter on Jean Baptista von Schweitzer, a German socialist rival. Schweitzer had been arrested in a park on a morals charge and not only did Marx and Engels refuse to join a committee defending him, they resorted to the cheapest form of bathroom humor in their private comments about the affair."
    13. "It is now quite plain to me — as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify — that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a nxxxxx). Now, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow’s importunity is also nxxxxx-like. [...] One of our nxxxxx’s great discoveries — which, however, he only confides to his ‘closest friends’ — is that the Pelasgians were of Semitic descent. The main evidence: in the Book of Maccabbees, the Jews send emissaries to solicit the help of Greece on grounds of kinship. Furthermore, an Etruscan inscription has been found in Perugia, and this was simultaneously deciphered by Hofrat Stucker in Berlin and an Italian, and both independently converted the Etruscan into the Hebrew alphabet. So that we can no longer discomfit him with ‘Blue Books’, he has bought 20 pounds’ worth of Blue Books (under Bucher’s guidance)."—Marx-Engels Correspondence 1862, Karl Marx
    14. Reffering to a seperate thought of Friedrich Engels from Karl Marx as in also expressed in Friedrich Engels' essay On Authority
    15. "A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other by means of rifles, bayonets, and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all." - Friedrich Engels.
    16. Anti-Dühring (1877), Part III: Socialism: "Nor is the abolition of the old division of labour a demand which could only be carried through to the detriment of the productivity of labour. On the contrary. Thanks to modern industry it has become a condition of production itself. “The employment of machinery does away with the necessity of crystallising the distribution of various groups of workmen among the different kinds of machines after the manner of Manufacture, by the constant annexation of a particular man to a particular function. Since the motion of the whole system does not proceed from the workman, but from the machinery, a change of persons can take place at any time without an interruption of the work... Lastly, the quickness with which machine work is learnt by young people, does away with the necessity of bringing up for exclusive employment by machinery, a special class of operatives.” But while the capitalist mode of employment of machinery necessarily perpetuates the old division of labour with its fossilised specialisation, although it has become superfluous from a technical standpoint, the machinery itself rebels against this anachronism. The technical basis of modern industry is revolutionary. ”By means of machinery, chemical processes and other methods, it is continually causing changes not only in the technical basis of production, but also in the functions of the labourer, and in the social combinations of the labour-process. At the same time, it thereby also revolutionises the division of labour within the society, and incessantly launches masses of capital and of workpeople from one branch of production to another. Modern industry, by its very nature, therefore necessitates variation of labour, fluency of function, universal mobility of the labourer... We have seen how this absolute contradiction ... vents its rage in the incessant human sacrifices from among the working-class, in the most reckless squandering of labour-power, and in the devastation caused by social anarchy. This is the negative side. But if, on the one hand, variation of work at present imposes itself after the manner of an overpowering natural law, and with the blindly destructive action of a natural law that meets with resistance at all points, modern industry, on the other hand, through its catastrophes imposes the necessity of recognising, as a fundamental law of production, variation of work, consequently fitness of the labourer for varied work, consequently the greatest possible development of his varied aptitudes. It becomes a question of life and death for society to adapt the mode of production to the normal functioning of this law. Modern industry makes it a question of life and death to replace the monstrosity of a destitute working population kept in reserve at the disposal of capital for the changing needs of exploitation with the absolute availability of man for the changing requirements of labour; to replace what is virtually a mere fragment of the individual, the mere carrier of a social detail-function, with the fully developed individual, to whom the different social functions are so many alternating modes of activity” ( Marx, Capital).
      Modern industry, which has taught us to convert the movement of molecules, something more or less universally feasible, into the movement of masses for technical purposes, has thereby to a considerable extent freed production from restrictions of locality. Water-power was local; steam-power is free. While water-power is necessarily rural, steam-power is by no means necessarily urban. It is capitalist utilisation which concentrates it mainly in the towns and changes factory villages into factory towns. But in so doing it at the same time undermines the conditions under which it operates. The first requirement of the steam-engine, and a main requirement of almost all branches of production in modern industry, is relatively pure water. But the factory town transforms all water into stinking manure. However much therefore urban concentration is a basic condition of capitalist production, each individual industrial capitalist is constantly striving to get away from the large towns necessarily created by this production, and to transfer his plant to the countryside. This process can be studied in detail in the textile industry districts of Lancashire and Yorkshire; modern capitalist industry is constantly bringing new large towns into being there by constant flight from the towns into the country. The situation is similar in the metal-working districts where, in part, other causes produce the same effects.
      Once more, only the abolition of the capitalist character of modern industry can bring us out of this new vicious circle, can resolve this contradiction in modern industry, which is constantly reproducing itself. Only a society which makes it possible for its productive forces to dovetail harmoniously into each other on the basis of one single vast plan can allow industry to be distributed over the whole country in the way best adapted to its own development, and to the maintenance and development of the other elements of production.
      Accordingly, abolition of the antithesis between town and country is not merely possible. It has become a direct necessity of industrial production itself, just as it has become a necessity of agricultural production and, besides, of public health. The present poisoning of the air, water and land can be put an end to only by the fusion of town and country; and only such fusion will change the situation of the masses now languishing in the towns, and enable their excrement to be used for the production of plants instead of for the production of disease.
      Capitalist industry has already made itself relatively independent of the local limitations arising from the location of sources of the raw materials it needs. The textile industry works up, in the main, imported raw materials. Spanish iron ore is worked up in England and Germany and Spanish and South-American copper ores, in England. Every coalfield now supplies fuel to an industrial area far beyond its own borders, an area which is widening every year. Along the whole of the European coast steam-engines are driven by English and to some extent also by German and Belgian coal. Society liberated from the restrictions of capitalist production can go much further still. By generating a race of producers with an all-round development who understand the scientific basis of industrial production as a whole, and each of whom has had practical experience in a whole series of branches of production from start to finish, this society will bring into being a new productive force which will abundantly compensate for the labour required to transport raw materials and fuel from great distances.
      The abolition of the separation of town and country is therefore not utopian, also, in so far as it is conditioned on the most equal distribution possible of modern industry over the whole country. It is true that in the huge towns civilisation has bequeathed us a heritage which it will take much time and trouble to get rid of. But it must and will be got rid of, however, protracted a process it may be. Whatever destiny may be in store for the German Empire of the Prussian nation, [119] Bismarck can go to his grave proudly aware that the desire of his heart is sure to be fulfilled: the great towns will perish.
      And now see how puerile is Herr Dühring’s idea that society can take possession of all means of production in the aggregate without revolutionising from top to bottom the old method of production and first of all putting an end to the old division of labour; that everything will be in order once “natural opportunities and personal capabilities are taken into account” {D. C. 259} — that therefore whole masses of entities will remain, as in the past, subjected to the production of one single article; whole “populations” {275} will be engaged in a single branch of production, and humanity continue to be divided, as in the past, into a number of different crippled “economic species” {329}, for there still are “porters” and “architects” {D. K.G. 500}. Society is to become master of the means of production as a whole, in order that each individual may remain the slave of his means of production, and have only a choice as to which means of production are to enslave him. And see also how Herr Dühring considers the separation of town and country as “inevitable in the nature of things” {D. C. 232}, and can find only a tiny palliative in schnaps-distilling and beet-sugar manufacturing — two, in their connection specifically Prussian, branches of industry; how he makes the distribution of industry over the country dependent on certain future inventions and on the necessity of associating industry directly with the procurement of raw materials — raw materials which are already used at an ever increasing distance from their place of origin! And Herr Dühring finally tries to cover up his rear by assuring us that in the long run social wants will carry through the union between agriculture and industry even against economic considerations, as if this would be some economic sacrifice! Certainly, to be able to see that the revolutionary elements which will do away with the old division of labour, along with the separation of town and country, and will revolutionise the whole of production; see that these elements are already contained in embryo in the production conditions of modern large-scale industry and that their development is hindered by the existing capitalist mode of production — to be able to see these things, it is necessary to have a somewhat wider horizon than the sphere of jurisdiction of Prussian law, than the country where production of schnaps and beet-sugar are the key industries, and where commercial crises can be studied on the book market. To be able to see these things it is necessary to have some knowledge of real large-scale industry in its historical growth and in its present actual form, especially in the one country where it has its home and where alone it has attained its classical development. Then no one will think of attempting to vulgarise modern scientific socialism and to degrade it into Herr Dühring’s specifically Prussian socialism."
    17. "But at the first victorious uprising of the French proletariat, which Louis Napoleon is striving with all his might to conjure up, the Austrian Germans and Magyars will be set free and wreak a bloody revenge on the Slav barbarians. The general war which will then break out will smash this Slav Sonderbund and wipe out all these petty hidebound nations, down to their very names."
    18. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism_and_LGBTQ_rights
    19. " Engels's stance of openly accepting gradualist, evolutionary and parliamentary tactics while claiming that the historical circumstances did not favour revolution caused confusion. Marxist revisionist Eduard Bernstein interpreted this as indicating that Engels was moving towards accepting parliamentary reformist and gradualist stances, but he ignored that Engels's stances were tactical as a response to the particular circumstances and that Engels was still committed to revolutionary socialism. Engels was deeply distressed when he discovered that his introduction to a new edition of The Class Struggles in France had been edited by Bernstein and orthodox Marxist Karl Kautsky in a manner which left the impression that he had become a proponent of a peaceful road to socialism."
    20. While Gutiérrez's social analysis was influenced by Marxism, he also rejected a lot of it's other aspects by considering it an "atheistic ideolgy", and warning other's of getting too influenced by it.
    21. https://thiswastv.com/eiichiro-oda-che-guevara/
    22. Only in his early days.
    23. 23.0 23.1 Debatable due to him not fully reading Marx
    24. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/index.htm
    25. 25.0 25.1 https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm
    26. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm

    Navigation

    pl:Marksizm zh:马克思主义

    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

    Recent changes

  • TheElectricBomb • 1 minute ago
  • Coco0330 • 1 hour ago
  • Coco0330 • 1 hour ago
  • Coco0330 • 1 hour ago
  • Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.