Council Communism: Difference between revisions

From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:
Council communists differ widely on the specifics, but they all agree that, generally, the association of free and equal producers can only be achieved by the system of workers councils.
Council communists differ widely on the specifics, but they all agree that, generally, the association of free and equal producers can only be achieved by the system of workers councils.


Council Communism, at its core, believes in the establishment of a dictatorship of the proletariat by means of a network of workers' councils. Council Communism rejects [[File:Socdem.png]] [[Social Democracy|social democratic]] methods like participation in parliaments and trade unions. Historically, council communists like Herman Gorter, Anton Pannekoek and the KAPD believed that the most determined form of organisation which groups together the most conscious and prepared proletarian fighters is the Party along with the idea that the communist party must have a thoroughly worked out programmatic basis and must be organised and disciplined in its entirety from below, as a unified will. However, some of the more recent councilists(like Ruhle and Mattick) would end up rejecting the party, believing it to be useless in the proletarian struggle and believing that the proletariat can do the revolution by itself without needing any forms of organisation other than the soviets.
Council Communism, at its core, believes in the establishment of a dictatorship of the proletariat by means of a network of workers' councils. Council Communism rejects [[File:Socdem.png]] [[Social Democracy|social democratic]] methods like participation in parliaments and trade unions. Historically, council communists like Herman Gorter, Anton Pannekoek and the KAPD believed that the party is needed in the conquest of political power by the workers along with the idea that the communist party must have a thoroughly worked out programmatic basis and must be organised and disciplined in its entirety from below, as a unified will. However, some of the more recent councilists(like Ruhle and Mattick) would end up rejecting the party, believing it to be useless in the proletarian struggle and believing that the proletariat can do the revolution by itself without needing any forms of organisation other than the soviets.


[[File:Councom.png]] Council Communists/Dutch-German Left Communists differ from [[File:Bordiga.png]] Italian Left Communists on the idea of the party. This can be seen in Pannekoek's Party and Class<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/pannekoe/1936/party-class.htm</ref> and Bordiga's work with the same name<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/bordiga/works/1921/party-class.htm</ref>. The Dutch-Germans emphasise on autonomous organisations for the working class, in contrast, the Italians uphold the role of the party being the working class itself.
[[File:Councom.png]] Council Communists/Dutch-German Left Communists differ from [[File:Bordiga.png]] Italian Left Communists on the idea of the party. This can be seen in Pannekoek's Party and Class<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/pannekoe/1936/party-class.htm</ref> and Bordiga's work with the same name<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/bordiga/works/1921/party-class.htm</ref>. The Dutch-Germans emphasise on autonomous organisations for the working class, in contrast, the Italians uphold the role of the party being the working class itself.