Democratic Confederalism: Difference between revisions
From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
*[[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism]] - We're supposed to be on the same side, why do you support [[File:Baath.png]] [[Ba'athism|Assad]] over me? Why won't you accept me? |
*[[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism]] - We're supposed to be on the same side, why do you support [[File:Baath.png]] [[Ba'athism|Assad]] over me? Why won't you accept me? |
||
*[[File:Putin.png]] [[Kleptocracy|Putinism]] - Thanks for calling for my inclusion in the Geneva III peace talks on Syria, And sending my support after [[File:Trumpism.png]] [[Right-Wing Populism|he]] left me, But you keep supporting [[File:Baath.png]] [[Ba'athism|Assad]] over me, also you are pretty conservative and authoritarian for my taste, better than [[File:Kemal.png]] [[Kemalism]] tho. |
*[[File:Putin.png]] [[Kleptocracy|Putinism]] - Thanks for calling for my inclusion in the Geneva III peace talks on Syria, And sending my support after [[File:Trumpism.png]] [[Right-Wing Populism|he]] left me, But you keep supporting [[File:Baath.png]] [[Ba'athism|Assad]] over me, also you are pretty conservative and authoritarian for my taste, better than [[File:Kemal.png]] [[Kemalism]] tho. |
||
**[[File:Putin.png]] - Alright, Comrade, I will replace the American troops that abandoned you and protect you from Turkey's Operation Peace Spring, and in return I ask you accept Semi-Autonomous Status in Syria, Also [https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Syria_2017D I removed the word "Arab" in the constitution I proposedy for Syria in 2017] for ya |
|||
*[[File:Absoc.png]] [[Arab Socialism]] - I like your socialist ideology and your dedication to anti-imperialism in the Middle East, but why did you try to Arabize Kurds when you controlled Rojava? |
*[[File:Absoc.png]] [[Arab Socialism]] - I like your socialist ideology and your dedication to anti-imperialism in the Middle East, but why did you try to Arabize Kurds when you controlled Rojava? |
||
*[[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism]] - It is now sufficiently clear that even the socialism—or sociology—of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, which emerged as the opposing worldview, is a very vulgar interpretation of society. In spite of all claims of opposing it, they could not escape serving capitalism—even more so than its official ideology, liberalism. This is sufficiently clear from the trends, movements, and state systems of [[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism|Marxism - Leninism]], [[File:socdem.png]] [[Social Democracy]], and [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism|national liberation]]. Despite their highly noble traditions of struggle, if the above mentioned trends and movements, while acting in the name of oppressed classes and nations, have found themselves in this situation, this is closely related to their knowledge structures. The knowledge structures that they rely on—both in their positive and negative aspects—have produced overall results that have contradicted their intentions. These outcomes would not have emerged so easily if there were not a chain of serious flaws and mistakes in their fundamental paradigm and structures. |
*[[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism]] - It is now sufficiently clear that even the socialism—or sociology—of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, which emerged as the opposing worldview, is a very vulgar interpretation of society. In spite of all claims of opposing it, they could not escape serving capitalism—even more so than its official ideology, liberalism. This is sufficiently clear from the trends, movements, and state systems of [[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism|Marxism - Leninism]], [[File:socdem.png]] [[Social Democracy]], and [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism|national liberation]]. Despite their highly noble traditions of struggle, if the above mentioned trends and movements, while acting in the name of oppressed classes and nations, have found themselves in this situation, this is closely related to their knowledge structures. The knowledge structures that they rely on—both in their positive and negative aspects—have produced overall results that have contradicted their intentions. These outcomes would not have emerged so easily if there were not a chain of serious flaws and mistakes in their fundamental paradigm and structures. |
||
