Left-Rothbardianism: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Ideology
|title
|image
|aliases
[[File:Left-Voluntaryism.png]] Left-Voluntaryism<br>▼
Left-Anarcho-Capitalism<br>
▲[[File:Left-Voluntaryism.png]]
Left-Voluntaryism<br>[[File:Markliberate.png]] Synthesis Market Anarchism<br>▼
Progressive Stage-Rothbard<br>
|alignments=
[[File:Cultcenter.png|link=:Category:Cultural Center]] [[:Category:Cultural Center|{{Color|#8BC34A|'''Cultural'''}} {{Color|#9D22B2|'''Center'''}}]]<br>
{{Info|Anarchists}}<br>
{{Info|Libertarians}}<br>
[[File:Syncretic.png|link=:Category:Syncretic]] [[:Category:Syncretic|{{Color|#F9BBBB|'''Sy'''}}{{Color|#93DAF8|'''nc'''}}{{Color|#C8E4BC|'''re'''}}{{Color|#F5F4AB|'''tic'''}}]]
|song=
|theorists
[[File:Glibr.png]] [[Green Libertarianism|Karl Hess]] (1923-1994), [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States<br>▼
*[[File:
*[[File:
▲*[[File:
|themecolor
|textcolor
|influences=
[[File:Ancap-1.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]]
[[File:
|caption=
}}
{{Quote|
quote="Socioeconomic equality and legal equality both fall short of the radicalism of Lockean equality. For neither of those forms of equality calls into question the authority of those who administer the legal system. … Both forms of equality call upon that power structure to do certain things; but in so doing, they both assume, and indeed require, an inequality in authority between those who administer the legal framework and everybody else."
|speaker=[[File:Bhl.png]] [[Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism|Roderick T. Long]]
}}
'''Left-Rothbardianism''', also called '''Left-Voluntaryism''', is an economically variable to right-wing and culturally ambiguous anarchist ideology that is the child of [[File:Anmark2.png]] [[Left-Wing Market Anarchism|Left-wing Market Anarchism]] and [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]].
The principle as a whole states that property can only be legitimately owned by 2 means, direct trade from the past owner or applying your labor to un-owned land, and it uses this principle to found its claim on the confiscation of "private" property,<ref>[https://www.panarchy.org/rothbard/confiscation.html Confiscation and the Homestead Principle by Murray Rothbard (1969)] Panarchy.org</ref> specifically the part where it states that applying your labor to un-owned property (Applying it to 'ill-gotten property') is legitimate leads to legitimate ownership of said property.
Despite the [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|Left-]] prefix of the name this ideology, which could make some people think this is a socialist ideology, it heavily advocates for the respect of private property<ref>Lora, Ronald; Longton, Henry (1999). ''The Conservative Press in Twentieth-Century America''. Greenwood Press. p. 369.</ref> as a natural right that derives from the right of self-ownership, but they don't see property as legitimate if its a derivative of coercion, which includes, if the property derives from [[File:Corp.png]] [[Corporatocracy|state benefits]].▼
==Beliefs==▼
It is a synthesis of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism]] and [[File:Anmark2.png]] [[Left-Wing Market Anarchism|Left-Market Anarchism]], that is, adopting Leftist rhetoric and applying certain principles ([[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism|The Lockean Homestead Principle]], for example) to create concepts agreeable to said left sector while still maintaining an Anarcho-Capitalist framework and advocating for the exact same society.▼
It also supports workers cooperatives as a viable option for the disbandance of the state (As stated before).▼
The difference between the [[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism|Classical homesteading principle]] and the [[File:NeoLocke.png]] [[Propertarianism|Neo-Lockean principle]] is that the first one also accepts the Lockean proviso as legitimate, which states that the homesteading principle only applies as long as there is enough and of the same quality for everybody else, while the Neo-Lockean principle rejects this proviso.
▲Despite the [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|Left-]] prefix of the name this ideology, which could make some people think this is a socialist ideology, it heavily advocates for the respect of private property<ref>Lora, Ronald; Longton, Henry (1999). ''The Conservative Press in Twentieth-Century America''. Greenwood Press. p. 369.</ref> as a natural right that derives from the right of self-ownership, but they don't see property as legitimate if its a derivative of coercion, which includes, if the property derives from [[File:Corp.png]] [[Corporatocracy|state benefits]].
They oppose the common consensus that [[File:Regulationism.png]] [[Regulationism|government regulation]] helps to eliminate or mitigate oppression by big corporations, saying that furthermore the state is the source of the problem it says to solve.
Line 39 ⟶ 47:
It believes that these corporations which were benefited from the state with more or less largesse should be allowed to be seized by their workers or third parties to eliminate state benefits to companies.<ref name="A">[https://www.panarchy.org/rothbard/confiscation.html Confiscation and the Homestead Principle by Murray Rothbard (1969)] Panarchy.org</ref>
▲==Beliefs==
▲It is a synthesis of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism]] and [[File:Anmark2.png]] [[Left-Wing Market Anarchism|Left-Market Anarchism]], that is, adopting Leftist rhetoric and applying certain principles ([[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism|The Lockean Homestead Principle]], for example) to create concepts agreeable to said left sector while still maintaining an Anarcho-Capitalist framework and advocating for the exact same society.
▲It also supports workers cooperatives as a viable option for the disbandance of the state (As stated before).
===Cases of legitimate confiscation of property===
Line 68 ⟶ 72:
{{Flag-auto
|c1
|h1
|c2
|h2
|c3
|h3
}}
Line 93 ⟶ 97:
===Enemies===
*[[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism|Marxism-Leninism]] - Authoritarianism? Elimination of private property and markets? UNBASED!!! REEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
*[[File:Nazi.png]] [[Nazism]] - NO
*[[File:Nazbol.png]] [[National Bolshevism]] - Unironic Nazi-Commie. You're horrible!
Line 112 ⟶ 116:
*[https://oreddit.com/r/LeftVoluntaryism/ r/LeftVoluntaryism]
*[https://twitter.com/LPMarketA Libertarian Party Market Anarchist Caucus on Twitter]
==References==
Line 137 ⟶ 139:
{{Navbox/Libertarians}}
{{Navbox/Prefixes}}
[[Category:Libertarian Left]]
[[Category:Libertarian Right]]
| |||