Machajskism: Difference between revisions
From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
Rigourdigga (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rigourdigga (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{Info|Libertarian Left|LibLeft}}<br> |
{{Info|Libertarian Left|LibLeft}}<br> |
||
{{Info|Anarchists}}<br> |
{{Info|Anarchists}}<br> |
||
[[File:LeftBert.png|link=:Category:Libertarians]] [[:Category:Libertarians|{{Color|#FF0000|'''Libertarians'''}}]]<br> |
|||
{{Info|Libertarians}}<br> |
|||
{{Info|Socialists}} |
{{Info|Socialists}} |
||
|influences= |
|influences= |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|dislikes= |
|dislikes= |
||
The Intelligentsia |
The Intelligentsia |
||
}} |
|||
{{Quote| |
|||
quote="The proletarians are told that the intelligentsia is not implicated in exploitation and lives by selling its own intellectual work power. This is a popularization of that abstract economic doctrine which declares inviolable the possessions of educated society." |
|||
|speaker=[[File:Leftpop-0.png]] [[Left-Wing Populism|Jan Wacław Machajski]] |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Machajskism''', '''Makhaevism''', or '''Anti-Intelligentsia Anarchism (AIA)''', (pronounced Ma-High-Skee, Ma-Hay-Skee or /maˈxaj.ski/ for the big brain people that SHOULDN'T BE HERE) argues that the class interests of intellectuals, including Marxist social democrats, are opposed to that of manual workers, since the unproductive labour of intellectuals depended upon preserving a hereditary monopoly on education at workers' expense. Rather than put their hopes in political revolution, revolution would consist of a violent revolt of the unemployed worker-peasant. |
'''Machajskism''', '''Makhaevism''', or '''Anti-Intelligentsia Anarchism (AIA)''', (pronounced Ma-High-Skee, Ma-Hay-Skee or /maˈxaj.ski/ for the big brain people that SHOULDN'T BE HERE) argues that the class interests of intellectuals, including Marxist social democrats, are opposed to that of manual workers, since the unproductive labour of intellectuals depended upon preserving a hereditary monopoly on education at workers' expense. Rather than put their hopes in political revolution, revolution would consist of a violent revolt of the unemployed worker-peasant. |
||
