Market Socialism: Difference between revisions
From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
m (→Relationships) |
||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
*[[File:Nordmodel.png]] [[Nordic Model]] - Same as above. |
*[[File:Nordmodel.png]] [[Nordic Model]] - Same as above. |
||
*[[File:Distributist.png]] [[Distributism]] - Pretty much on the same page, but they're a little more religious than I am. |
*[[File:Distributist.png]] [[Distributism]] - Pretty much on the same page, but they're a little more religious than I am. |
||
*[[File:Tito.png]] [[Titoism]] - My most successful form. |
*[[File:Tito.png]] [[Titoism]] - My most successful form, but quit it with the excessive meddling in the cooperatives. |
||
*[[File:Goulash.png]] [[Goulash Communism]] - The market reforms to improve living standards are good, but you could've incentivized more workers' self-management. |
*[[File:Goulash.png]] [[Goulash Communism]] - The market reforms to improve living standards are good, but you could've incentivized more workers' self-management. |
||
*[[File:Yellsoc.png]] [[Yellow Socialism]] - A bit too [[File:React.png]] [[Reactionarism|reactionary]] social-wise, but otherwise he's cool. |
*[[File:Yellsoc.png]] [[Yellow Socialism]] - A bit too [[File:React.png]] [[Reactionarism|reactionary]] social-wise, but otherwise he's cool. |
||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
*[[File:Social corpratism.png]] [[Social Corporatism]] - Better than regular [[File:corptism.png]] corporatism, but still too hierarchic. |
*[[File:Social corpratism.png]] [[Social Corporatism]] - Better than regular [[File:corptism.png]] corporatism, but still too hierarchic. |
||
*[[File:Orthlen.png]] [[Leninism]] - You understand that cooperatives are a good way to transition into socialism, which is based, I also like the New Economic Policy, but your rejection of reform is something I wouldn't like, in fact, reform is ideal in achieving socialism. |
*[[File:Orthlen.png]] [[Leninism]] - You understand that cooperatives are a good way to transition into socialism, which is based, I also like the New Economic Policy, but your rejection of reform is something I wouldn't like, in fact, reform is ideal in achieving socialism. |
||
*[[File:Honecker.png]] [[Honeckerism]] - Still too planned for my tea, but it's good that you took a step to embrace some market socialist ideals. |
|||
*[[File:Juche.png]] [[Juche]] - I like your economic ideas, but the authoritarianism and protectionism is cringe. |
*[[File:Juche.png]] [[Juche]] - I like your economic ideas, but the authoritarianism and protectionism is cringe. |
||
*[[File:Statesoc.png]] [[State Socialism]] - We are both socialists, but you should lessen your authoritarian rhetoric. A planned economy is stagnant and your tendency to be overly centralized and overly bureaucratic in dealing with economics tends to hurt the working class more than it helps them. |
*[[File:Statesoc.png]] [[State Socialism]] - We are both socialists, but you should lessen your authoritarian rhetoric. A planned economy is stagnant and your tendency to be overly centralized and overly bureaucratic in dealing with economics tends to hurt the working class more than it helps them. |
||
