Neoreactionaryism: Difference between revisions
→Inner Party
JustaWorker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Shigeruguy (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 284:
*[[File:Reactlib.png]] [[Reactionary Liberalism]] - "What could an [[File:OldWhig.png]] [[Hayekism|old whig]] [[File:Hayek.png]] be, if not a reactionary progressive?"
*[[File:Trad.png]] [[Traditionalism]] - It wouldn't be bad if you accept some new ideas but you're still deeply redpilled and based.
*[[File:LeopoldII.png]] [[Monarcho-Capitalism|Leopold II Thought]] - He makes a formalist state, even if you're part of the worst of colonialism you still are far better than the majority of the governments of the Congo.<ref>[https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2009/08/from-cromer-to-romer-and-back-again/ From Cromer to Romer and Back Again: Colonialism for the 21st Century] by Mencius Moldbug</ref
*[[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] [[Pinochetism]] - His rule was similar to what a military monarchy would be. A shame he didn't drop republicanism altogether and acknowledged the referendum where he lost.
Line 302:
===Inner Party===
*[[File:Liberalsoc.png]] [[Liberal Socialism]] - The ultimate blue pill addict. [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] - Master of the Inner Party.
*[[File:Socdem.png]] [[Social Democracy]] - Bait and switch tactic.
*[[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism-Leninism]] - "No one who condones Che, Stalin, Mao, or any other leftist murderer, has any right to ask anyone else to dissociate himself from a rightist who didn't even make triple digits." -Curtis Yarvin
| |||