Radical Centrism: Difference between revisions

|themecolor= #778899

|aliases={{CollapseScrollBox|

NonpartisanNonidealogical Radicalism<br>

Stressed Liners (According to PewResearchPew Research Center)<br>

"ForAnti-bad all thethings pro-good against all the badthings"-ism<br>

Radical centrism is a concept that arose in Western nations in the late 20th century. Despite being conflated with ideologies such as syncretism, dead centrism, moderatism, radical liberalism or anti-extremism, it is actually a “meta ideology” that may incorporate elements of these frameworks. Radical centrism, instead of actively searching for a compromise between extremist ideologies like a dead or moderate centrist, is willing to use radical solutions. It uses individual policy proposals from across the political spectrum in a pragmatic way that does not fall upon partisan lines. There are no clearly defined policies for radical centrists but the ideology places a heavy emphasis on pragmatism over ideology, going so far as to call themselves “unideological” or “anti-ideological” due to their willingness to break through party lines to solve systems. Radical centrists borrow ideas from the left and the right, often melding them together and incorporating aspects that are complementary. It should be noted that although the radical centrist has a tendency towards moderate solutions, he isn’t above radical solutions. There is support for the growth of an empowered middle class. General policies common to many radical centrists and radical centrist literature include-

*[[File:SecularCorptism.png]] [[SecularismCorporatism]] - ChurchClass andcollaboration state must be separated for allpragmatism.

*[[File:Horshu.png]] [[Horseshoe Centrism]] - Says there's no difference between balance and imbalance as if that makes muchany sense.

*[[File:Reform.png]] [[Reformism]] - Being a radical is actually good!

*[[File:Socdem.png]] [[Social Democracy]] - How about ''affordable''having healthcarestate intervention and educationsocial welfare but we try not to go overboard with it?

*[[File:Cdem.png]] [[Christian Democracy]] & [[File:Islamic Democracy.png]] [[Islamic Democracy]] - How about ''awe littlekeep bit''the amount of religion in government but''to wea maintain separation of church and stateminimum''?

*[[File:LaicismSecular.png]] [[Secularism#Laicism]] - AndIf howyou aboutsimply wedon't separateinterfere churchwith andpeople's statereligious butbeliefs stillthen allowyou're themfine; toif it's you're slightly more authoritarian French variant then I might have some influence?issues.

*[[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism]] and& [[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism]] - How about ''some'' corporate freedom but we regulate them when things get out of control?

*[[File:Neolud.png]] [[Neoluddism]] - Can we mititagtemitigate the problems of the Industrial Society ''without'' completely getting rid of it?

*[[File:Liberalsoc.png]] [[Liberal Socialism]] & [[File:Marketsoc.png]] [[Market Socialism]] - Honestly not too bad by socialist standards, but I'd still rather just have decent worker's rights and a solid enough social welfare system than an eventual goal of complete socialpublic ownership.

*[[File:Nalib.png]] [[National Liberalism]] - We both like [[File:SpaCiudadanos.png]] Albert Rivera, [[File:RPUSA.png]] Ross Perot, Michael Lind and early [[File:Trump 2000.png]] Donald Trump, but overall you're a mixed bag. <small> Like the other ideologies here btw.</small>

*[[File:Socliber.png]] [[Social Libertarianism]] &, [[File:Bhl.png]] [[Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism]] & [[File:Steinval.png]] [[Steiner-Vallentyne School]] - How about being open to just a bit ''somemore'' state power? But. Yang is baseda really awesome guy though.

* [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/@ShortFatOtaku ShortFatOtaku] [[File:NalibSFO.png]]