Social Authoritarianism: Difference between revisions

It believes in [[File:3P.png]] a political-economic system which would not be [[File:Cap.png]] capitalist neither [[File:ML.png]] communist, while often accused of ''de facto'' being pro-Soviet and [[File:Soc.png]] socialist-leaning; it's developmentalist and highly nationalist, with a strong state control over property and the creation of self-managed socialist cooperatives. Culturally, it promotes [[File:Cball-Peru.png]] Peruvian culture even sometimes rejecting western culture. It's authoritarian and [[File:Strato-Antifurry.png]] militaristic, rejecting both armed revolutions and [[File:Dem.png]] multi-party elections; while it rejected political parties as a ruling methog, ''de facto'' it established a one-party state with [[File:DemML.png]] [[Authoritarian Democracy|SINAMOS]] (Sistema Nacional de Apoyo a la Movilización Social, "National System of Support for Social Mobilisation" in English) being ''de facto'' ruling party (while it was government agency rather than a proper political party). In foreign policy, it was neutral in the Cold War (while again ''de facto'' being somewhat pro-Soviet in foreign policy), and it supported other anti-imperialist movements in Latin America (like [[File:Allende.png]] [[Democratic Socialism|Allende's Chile]], [[File:Cball-Panama.png]] [[Social Democracy|Torrijos' Panama]], etc)