Totalitarianism: Difference between revisions

* [[File:Euras.png]] [[Fourth Theory]] - <s>Just admit it, you like me.</s> FAR Too moderate but otherwise I like your repression of human rights.

**[[File:Euras.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]]My "repression" of human rights is rather based on several reasons;

1. Rights, such as the right to protest, the right to speak freely, the right to privacy, etc. are granted and legally enshrined by states, generally in constitutions or other bodies of law.

2. In order for these rights to be implemented, a state structure must be in place involving police, courts and other institutions that stop individuals and organisations from denying the rights of others.

3. The implementation of "human rights", or rights encompassing all of humanity would similarly require a state structure encompassing all of humanity, meaning the whole world.

4. This state structure would have to have its own police, courts and various other institutions that would have jurisdiction over the entire planet.

5. At the present moment, no such state structures exist. Therefore, to implement "human rights", an existing state would have to claim jurisdiction over the entire planet and all humans living on it.

6. This is essentially what the doctrine of "human rights", primarily preached by Western states and most especially, the United States of America, implies. When a state invokes this concept they are implying that they should govern the entire planet.

7. So therefore, unless you believe that the United States or any other state invoking the concept of human rights should govern all of humanity, you should oppose human rights.

Also. I follow Dasein, which is a philosophical idea on the individual, NOT the Collective![[File:RBubble.png]]

* [[File:OOTS.png]] [[Death Worship]] [[File:OOTS2.png]] - Just Ingsoc combined with Showa Statism. Idk that suicide for the state isn't too much.