User:Coindorni: Difference between revisions

From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:
For NrL, there is a great difference between natural ''law'' and natural ''rights''.
For NrL, there is a great difference between natural ''law'' and natural ''rights''.


The former includes anything that goes against human nature (or in Christian terms: God's plan for humanity); namely, every sin; being thus a moral category of what is right and wrong, and which can be grasped through natural revelation (as we can see in the like of Aristotle), and reinforced through scripture.
The former includes anything that goes against human nature (or in Christian terms: God's plan for humanity); namely, every sin; being thus a moral category of what is right and wrong, and which can be grasped through natural revelation (as we can see in the like of Aristotle), and reinforced by scripture (divine revelation).


On the other hand, the concept of natural rights refers to matters of legality and political order, and aren't concerned with what one should or shouldn't do, but with what acts should be legally permissible. They are determined by reason through [[File:Hoppef.png]] [[Hoppeanism#Argumentation_Ethics|argumentation ethics]], and are derived from the nature of norms, argumentation, and human action.
On the other hand, the concept of natural rights refers to matters of legality and political order, and aren't concerned with what one should or shouldn't do, but with what acts should be legally permissible. They are determined by reason through [[File:Hoppef.png]] [[Hoppeanism#Argumentation_Ethics|argumentation ethics]], and are derived from the nature of norms, argumentation, and human action.