Jump to content

User:SweatingCup2632: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 77:
===How interventionism should be handled without hurting the economy===
Alas, regulationism in history has caused some trouble, and all (or most) of it for one reason: regulationism was run cumbersomely. The policies implemented most of the time were incompatible with the natural functioning of the market, often leading to a sick and dependent market on the decidedly not eternal subsidies. In my view, however, interventionism must have the dual purpose of welfare and economic growth. For example, if you need to hire people in an area, you focus on the most productive sectors by going along with financial forecasts and thus giving the initial financial boost to a growth process that must be autonomous.
 
=== Collective Agreements ===
I believe that the minimum wage system should not be rigid, like the typical Western model, but that it should be regulated by collective agreements with individual companies, as is done today in Denmark and Sweden. This would allow for high wages but based on a collaboration with companies that does not discourage growth.
 
=== Taxation ===
Line 274 ⟶ 277:
===Italians [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] ===
 
*[[File:LpopFivestaricon.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Star_Movement Five Stars Movement] - I like cracking down fiscal evasion and unions suck for me too but your degrowth policies are absurd and you're too populist for me
 
*[[File:Nation.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lega_per_Salvini_Premier Lega per Salvini Premier] - There would be tons of things to tell about it, they did lots of mistakes and they barely know what they're doing
Line 288 ⟶ 291:
*[[File:Cball-US.png|frameless]] [[File:RepubUS.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States) Republican Party] - Some of your candidates improved your economy while others did not, it's a meh for Republicans as well
*[[File:Cball-Germany.png|frameless]] [[File:GerSPD.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Democratic_Party_of_Germany Social Democratic Party of Germany] - Respectable party, but you tend to be a bit too socialist
* [[File:Cball-Germany.png|frameless]] [[File:CDU Party.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Democratic_Union_of_Germany Christian Democratic Union] - I like your europeist policies and you manage to be both popular and not populist
*[[File:Cball-Germany.png|frameless]] [[File:Alternative for germany ball.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_for_Germany Alternative für Deutschland] - Nah, you would bring Germany to decline
*[[File:Cball-UK.png|frameless]] [[File:Con-t.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Party_(UK) Conservative Party (UK)] - Your policies are theoretically good, but Brexit was a big flop to me
*[[File:Cball-UK.png|frameless]] [[File:UKLab.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_Party_(UK) Labour Party (UK)] - I like third way, but I'd scrap all the [[File:Dsa.png|frameless]] [[Democratic Socialism|democratic socialism]] stuff
 
==Opinion concerning current issues ==
 
=== [[File:Gay.png|frameless]] LGBTQ+ Community's rights===
In my opinion, making a distinction between the rights of heterosexuals and all others is like making a distinction between light and dark hair. I see absolutely no reason why a homosexual couple should not enjoy the same rights as a heterosexual one. On the other hand, if you exhibit something obscene during a demonstration, LGBTQ+ or not, it is obscene.
 
Line 301 ⟶ 304:
I will only say that homosexual couples cannot adopt a child if someone presents me with the results of a trustworthy study stating the 'abnormality' of children raised by homosexual couples.
 
===[[File:Liberal Democracy.png|frameless]] Abortion ===
Preventing abortion means denying a woman the human and fundamental right to be the master of her own body. I would only prevent abortion if too long after conception
 
Line 328 ⟶ 331:
I would simply apply the aforementioned principles to gradually push companies to invest in renewable (or nuclear) resources without them having economic losses
 
===[[File:World.png]] External Policy ===
If economically the more countries are united, the better, militarily, I think it is important to preserve a safe environment for our nation, even through arms sales or direct military involvement.
 
Line 343 ⟶ 346:
At this point we are all sure that globalisation is inevitable, but not unmanageable. Economic globalisation must be shaped according to the needs of the nation and its citizens. This means making sure the national market does have the upper hand, but with foreign markets also having the power, through competition, to shape prices in favour of the consumers and growth.
 
==What does Rome have to do with this? ==
We all know Rome, the cultural cradle of Europe for years and years. And it is this feeling, this desire to return to being the cultural beacon of Europe, that separates me from pure [[File:Progress.png|frameless]] [[progressivism]]. Of course, I don't have the territorial holdings of the Roman Empire, but some territories surely belong to the state of Italy: Istria, Savoy, Nice and the Ticino area. For the rest, in my opinion, the new meaning of restoring the Roman Empire is to become the jewel of Europe, culturally, economically and socially.
 
==Test Results ==
 
=== The Political Compass===
 
Economic [[File:Leftunity.png]] [[:Category:Left Unity|Left]]/[[:Category:Right Unity|Right]] [[File:Rightunity-yellow.png]]: 1.0
Line 399 ⟶ 402:
Ideology Assignment: [[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism]] [[File:Clib.png]] (ain't too sure about this assignment)
 
=== EconValues ===
[[File:SWCEconValues.png|frameless]]
 
=== RightValues ===
[[File:SWCRightValues.png|frameless]]
 
118

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.