Anarcho-Transhumanism: Difference between revisions
m
→Relationship to Transhumanism
Duck-Citizen (talk | contribs) (One time use of icon is enough) |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 66:
Borrowing from [[File:Antech.png]] [[Techno-Anarchism|techno-anarchism]], anarchist activist William Gillis and others argue that the disruptive nature of emergent technologies are either incompatible or extremely dangerous with hierarchical structures of today, including representative or majoritarian democracy. Failure to challenge physical and social conditions together has been argued to risk [[File:Captrans.png]] [[Capitalist Transhumanism|oligarchic transhumanism]], primitivism, or even [[File:VHMent.png]] [[Antinatalism|extinction]].
Anarcho-Transhumanists also criticize non-anarchist forms of transhumanism such as [[File:Nattrans.png]] [[Nazi Transhumanism]] and [[File:Libtrans.png]] [[Libertarian Transhumanism]] as incoherent and unsurvivable due to their preservation of the state. They view such instruments of power as inherently unethical and incompatible with the acceleration of social and material freedom for all individuals.
Individual Anarcho-Transhumanists may or may not be singularitarians, variously considering an anarchist society and hypothesized singularity events as prerequisites, mutually exclusive, or inevitable outcomes of one another.
| |||