Guild Socialism: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
m (→Relationships) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 27:
*[[File:BertrandRussel.png]] [[Liberal Socialism|Bertrand Russell]] (1875-1970) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] UK
*[[File:Liberalsoc.png]] [[Liberal Socialism|Ernst Wigforss]] (1881-1977) [[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden
*[[File:
*[[File:BlueLabour.png]] [[Conservative Socialism|Maurice Glasman]] (1961-) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] UK
|likes=Workers' Guilds<br>
Line 46:
What sets Guild Socialism apart from other forms of socialism is how the guildsmen is to maintain the apprehension in the framing of social arrangements, and how the economy would consist of guilds, mainly on the local level but also some on the national level, which would serve to include workers of all areas of whichever sector said guild represents.
Likewise, it criticizes both [[File:Statesoc.png]] [[State Socialism]] and [[File:Synd.png]] [[Syndicalism]] as leaving open the possibility of tyranny, and likewise [[File:
While it sees [[File:Synd.png]] Trade Unionism as what is supposed to become the upcoming guilds, it has also criticized trade unions for being too moderate and compromising, in addition to how many only focus on one workplace rather than the common industry, arguing that even if that specific workplace is freed, many in the same industry are still exploited, in addition to believing that there can’t be worker’s justice under the hierarchy of capitalism.
| |||