Hoppeanism: Difference between revisions
→Frenemies
Rigourdigga (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 14:
[[File:Anreactlib.png]] Anarcho-Reactionary Liberalism<br>
[[File:ORA.png]] Paleolibertarian Anarcho-Capitalism<br>
[[File:
[[File:AnNatcap.png]] Anarcho-National Capitalism<br>
[[File:Annatbert.png]] Anarcho-National Libertarianism<br>
[[File:Anbertmon.png]] Anarcho-Libertarian Monarchism<br>
Line 52 ⟶ 53:
*[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] (1949-) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] {{PBW|West Germany}} / [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
*[[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Stephan Kinsella]] (1965-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
*[[File:AltBert.png]] [[Alt-Right|Christopher "Chase" Rachels]] (1989-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
*[[File:TaleedJBrown.png]] [[Anarcho-Fascism|Taleed Brown]] (?-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
Line 106:
[[File:Frankfurt.png]] [[Frankfurt School]]<br>
[[File:Kant.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Kantian Philosophy]]<br>
[[File:Natcap.png]] [[National Capitalism]]<ref>[https://archive.org/details/fromnationtohousehold From Nation to Household]<br>
Selected quotation: "The answer is a program of nationalist capitalism, or capitalistic nationalism. Like Francis' national socialism, the national capitalist program has an economic and a cultural component. The similarities of both programs lie in their cultural components. Both are proponents of cultural conservatism and traditional family-centered morality; both are decidedly Western and propose that America was - and should be - a white European Christian male dominated civilization, and hence both oppose all multi-counter-cultural-egalitarian measures and policies. Both programs differ fundamentally, however, regarding the economic policies which they would combine with this cultural conservatism. National socialism would combine its cultural conservatism with the economic politics of the left. But as was explained, these two programmatic elements are incompatible and cannot be successfully combined. In distinct contrast, national capitalism hies to combine cultural conservatism with traditional American laissez-faire capitalism as proposed by old-fashioned 'Austrian' school economists from Bob-Bawerk to Mises and Rothbard - the mortal enemies of the socialists of all stripes from Marx on up to his present social-democratic-liberal-neoconservative followers. In so doing, the national capitalist program has from the outset the distinctive advantage of combining what can - and indeed must - be combined if one wishes to reach one's set goal."</ref><br>
[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]]<br>
[[File:AntiAntiAbortion.png]] Pro-Choice<br>
Line 139 ⟶ 141:
One of the inputs which Hoppe made to Anarcho-Capitalism, although also recognized by [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Anarcho-Capitalism's]] creator, Murray Rothbard, as "a dazzling breakthrough for political philosophy in general and for libertarianism in particular"<ref>Symposium (November 1988). [http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/files/printarchive/Liberty_Magazine_November_1988.pdf "Hans-Hermannn Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics: Breakthrough or Buncombe?"] (PDF). Liberty. 2 (2): 44–54.</ref> is argumentation ethics, which could, in short, be defined as proof provided by Hoppe for the ethics of right-libertarian conception of property rights developed in 1988. It aims to prove that arguing against the right-libertarian interpretation of self-ownership (which extends the concept to include control of private property as part of the self<ref>[https://mises.org/sites/default/files/economics_and_ethics_of_private_property_2020.pdf "The Economics and Ethics of Private Property"] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 1993</ref>) is contradictory and thus not logically coherent. Although this, at first, could sound like something that would come to be a widely popular theory within [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarian]] circles, the reception was mixed.<ref>Kinsella, Stephan (March 13, 2009). [http://archive.mises.org/9610/revisiting-argumentation-ethics/ "Revisiting Argumentation Ethics".] Mises Economics Blog. Ludwig von Mises Institute.</ref>
To explain it briefly, Hoppe takes note that, to have an argument, one must
===Private Law Society===
Line 255 ⟶ 257:
*[[File:WelfChauvin.png]] [[Welfare Chauvinism]] -"''That is, they subsidize immigration- they force domestic taxpayers to subsidize immigration. In particular, they also subsidize domestic employers who contract foreign cheaper workers''"<ref>[https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/hans-hermann-hoppe/immigration-and-libertarianism/ Immigration and Libertarianism] </ref>
*[[File:LeftCom.png]] [[Italian Left Communism]] -"We Both Dislike Democracy and Anti-Fascism"
*[[File:Bckchn.png]] [[Libertarian Municipalism]] - Leftist that likes ostrakysm too. But his cultural views are kinda cringe and anti-monarchist stances make me yawn.
===Enemies===
Line 265 ⟶ 268:
*[[File:Multicult.png]] [[Multiculturalism]] - There can be peaceful coexistence of different cultures along distant, physically separated territory. But Multiculturalism - cultural heterogeneity - cannot exist in one and the same place without leading to diminishing trust, increased tension and the call for a strongman and ultimately the end of libertarian social order.
*[[File:Statlib.png]] [[State Liberalism]] - Authoritarian, progressive AND corporatocratic? You are pure evil.
*[[File:Block.png]] [[
*[[File:Necon.png]] [[Neoconservatism]] - Stop attacking, killing and bombing people in foreign countries!
*[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] - Same with you!
| |||