Jump to content

Nomadology: Difference between revisions

4,428 bytes added ,  2 months ago
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{MessageBox/Wip|HelloThere314}}
{{Ideology
| title = [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]] Meta-AnarchismNomadology
| image = Metanarch.jpg
| aliases =
Line 14:
[[File:Anpostleft.png]] [[:Category:Post-Left|Post-Left]]
|theorists =
*[[File:Deleuze.png]] [[w:Gilles_DeleuzePost-Anarchism|Gilles Deleuze]] (1925-1995), [[File:Cball-France.png]] {{PBW|Franceball|France }}
*[[File:Guattari.png]] [[w:Félix_GuattariAutonomism|Félix Guattari]] (1930-1992), [[File:Cball-France.png]] {{PBW|Franceball|France }}
*[[File:Auton.png]] [[w:Antonio_NegriAutonomism|Antonio Negri]] (1933-), [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] {{PBW|Italyball|Italy}}
*[[File:Agamben.png]] [[w:Giorgio_AgambenAutonomism|Giorgio Agamben]] (1942-) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] {{PBW|Italyball|Italy}}
*[[File:Cyberfem.png]] [[w:Donna_HarawayCyberFeminism|Donna Haraway]] (1944-), [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
*[[File:ExistPostAn.png]] [[w:Todd_MayPost-Anarchism|Todd May]] (1955-), [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
*[[File:NickLand.png]] [[Landian Accelerationism|Nick landLand]] (1962-) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] {{PBW|UKball|UK}}
*[[File:Cyberfem.png]] [[w:Sadie_PlantCyberFeminism|Sadie Plant]] (1964-), [[File:Cball-UK.png]] {{PBW|UKball|UK}}
*[[File:LeftacFisher.png]] [[w:Mark_FisherAcid Communism|Mark Fisher]] (1968-2017) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] {{PBW|UKball|UK}}
*[[File:Newman.png]] [[w:Saul_NewmanPost-Anarchism|Saul Newman]] (1972-), [[File:Cball-UK.png]] {{PBW|UKball|UK}}
*[[File:DarkDeleuze.png]] [[Insurrectionary Anarchism|Andrew Culp]] (???-) [[fileFile:Cball-US.png]] US
| influences =
[[File:Awaj.png]] [[Anarchism]]<br>
[[File:Existentialist Anarchism.png]] [[Existentialist Anarchism]] <br>
[[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism]] <br>
[[File:NeomarxNietzsche.png]] [[Neo-Marxism]] {{PHB|Nietzscheanism}}<br>
[[File:NietzschePostMarxism.png]] [[mh:philosophyball:Nietzscheanism{{PHB|Nietzscheanism]] Post-Marxism}}<br>
[[File:PostMarxismPostmodernicon.png]] [[w:Post-Marxism{{PHB|Post-Marxism]]Modernism}}<br>
[[File:PostmoderniconPoststruct.png]] [[mh:philosophyball:Post-Modernism{{PHB|Post-Modernism]] Structuralism}}<br>
[[File:Spinoza.png]] {{PHB|Spinozism}}
[[File:Poststruct.png]] [[mh:philosophyball:Post-Structuralism|Post-Structuralism]] <br>
[[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Spinozism]]
| influenced =
[[File:Accel.png]] [[Accelerationism]] <br>
Line 42 ⟶ 41:
[[File:Landian Accelerationism.png]] [[Landian Accelerationism]] <br>
[[File:LesbiaNRx.png]] [[LesbiaNRx]]<br>
[[File:CCRU.png]] [[Occult Post-Humanism]]<br>
[[File:Post-an.png]] [[Post-Anarchism]] <br>
[[File:Anpostleft.png]] [[Post-Leftism]]<br>
Line 48:
| likes = Deterritorialization<br> Multiplicity<br> Rhizomes
| dislikes = Universalism<br> Capitalism<br> Fascism<br> Psychoanalysis
| founder =
| caption = "Make thought a war machine"
| sub =
*[[File:Deleuze.png]] '''Deleuzianism''' {{Collapse|
**[[File:Thar.png]] [[Anti-Authoritarianism]]
**[[File:Anticap.png]] [[Socialism{{PCBA|Anti-Capitalism]]}}
**[[File:NietzscheVital.png]] [[w:Friedrich Nietzsche|Nietzscheanism]]Bergsonianism
*[[File:Empiricism.png]] {{PHB|Empiricism}}
**[[File:PostMarxism.png]] [[w:Post-Marxism|Post-Marxism]]<ref>"I think Felix Guattari and I are both still Marxists, though perhaps in different ways." in Negotiations 1972-1990 </ref></s>
**[[File:PostmoderniconDavidHume.png]] [[w:Post-Modernism|Post-Modernism]]Humeanism
**[[File:PoststructKant.png]] [[w:Post-Structuralism{{PHB|Post-Structuralism]]Kantianism}}
**[[File:Monkeyzz-EnlightenmentMonadology.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Spinozism]]Monadologism
*[[File:Nietzsche.png]] {{PHB|Nietzscheanism}}
*[[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestinian Nationalism<ref>https://www.google.com/url?q=https://deleuze.cla.purdue.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/the-grandeur-of-yasser-arafat.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwi8qYGOhv2EAxUrbPUHHUHhBgEQFnoECAcQAg&usg=AOvVaw1Sy-pWF6GjuONW9dYbhTV6</ref>
**[[File:PostMarxism.png]] [[w:Post-Marxism{{PHB|Post-Marxism]]}}<ref>"I think Felix Guattari and I are both still Marxists, though perhaps in different ways." in Negotiations 1972-1990 </ref></s>
*[[File:Postmodernicon.png]] {{PHB|Post-Modernism}}
*[[File:Poststruct.png]] [[mh:philosophyball:Post-Structuralism{{PHB|Post-Structuralism]] <br>}}
*[[File:Spinoza.png]] {{PHB|Spinozism}}
}}
*[[File:Guattari.png]] '''Guattarism''' {{Collapse|
**[[File:Auton.png]] [[Autonomism]]
**[[File:Deepe.png]] [[Deep Ecology]]
**[[File:PostMarxism.png]] [[w:Post-Marxism{{PHB|Post-Marxism]]}}
**[[File:Postmodernicon.png]] [[w:Post-Modernism{{PHB|Post-Modernism]]}}
**[[File:Poststruct.png]] [[w:Post-Structuralism{{PHB|Post-Structuralism]]}}
**[[File:Trot.png]] [[Trotskyism]] (formerly)
}}
| variants school =
*[[File:DarkDeleuze.png]] '''Dark Deleuzianism''' {{Collapse|
**[[File:Communization.png]] [[Communization Theory]]
**[[File:Insarch.png]] [[Insurrectionary Anarchism]]
**[[File:Post-an.png]] [[Post-Anarchism]]
**[[File:Postmodernicon.png]] [[w:Post-Modernism{{PHB|Post-Modernism]]}}
**[[File:Postsitu.png]] [[Situationism|Post-Situationism]]
**[[File:Poststruct.png]] [[w:Post-Structuralism{{PHB|Post-Structuralism]]}}
}}
}}
'''Meta-AnarchismNomadology''', also known as '''Deleuzoguattarianism''', is a philosophical and political ideology that focuses on an analysis of different social structures based upon ideas such as machines, territories, war machines, etc. It analyzes these structures from a [[File:Poststruct.png]] [[w:Post-Structuralism|Post-Structuralist]] and a [[File:Postmodernicon.png]] [[w:Post-Modernism|Post-Modernist]] perspective, rejecting any fundamental principle for its ideas, instead relying on what Deleuze and Guattari call [[File:Pragmat.png]] [[w:Pragmatism|Pragmatics]]. Their political ideas are broadly based upon [[File:Anpostleft.png]] [[Post-Leftism|Post-Left]] ideas arising after may 68.
 
==History==
Line 90 ⟶ 95:
Deleuze and Guattari collaborated on 3 works: ''Capitalism and Schizophrenia'', ''Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature'', and ''What is Philosophy?'' These works describe the foundations of schizoanalysis and other shared ideas, though they where expanded individually by Deleuze and Guattari respectively. Their most famous work was ''Capitalism and Schizophrenia'', was an attack upon traditional psychological practice and its dogma. Their attitudes in this work became synonymous with post-structuralism and post-modernism, with them emphasizing the nomadology of knowledge and identity. This work was split into two volumes, those being: ''Anti-Oedipus'' and ''A Thousand Plateaus''. ''Anti-Oedipus'' is the fundamental text of schizoanalysis, constructing its practice out of a criticism of classical psychoanalysis. They also recontextualize [[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism|Marx's]] dialectical materialism into desiring production. Nietzsche's will to power is very influential to how Deleuze and Guattari describe desiring production. ''A Thousand Plateaus'' puts both the ideas arising out of ''Anti-Oedipus'' and the new idea of the rhizome into praxis. The rhizome is a group of machines that are connected in the sense that none are prioritized over the other and that a connection is always in the middle, there is no start or end. They use both the basis of schizoanalysis and a rhizomatic way of thinking to analyze various things such as sexuality, linguistics, war machines, etc.
 
''Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature'' came to being out of Deleuze and Guattari's shared distaste towards the current interpritations and analysis of [[File:Existentialist Anarchism.png]] [[Existentialist Anarchism|Kafka's]] literature. Throughout this text they attack many narratives given by analysts to Kafka: such as the oedipalization of his work, placing him in mother father narratives. They also critique the placement of theology in Kafka as above all other things that can be drawn out of him, such as his existentialist and anarchist political and personal ideas. This mode of thinking is what they call major literature, a mode of analysis that relies on socially constructed narratives and concepts. While the topic of the text is literature, they extend this major categorization to philosophy, attacking thinkers such as [[File:Descartes.png]] [[w:Rene Descartes|Descartes]], [[File:Kant.png]] [[w:Immanuel Kant|Kant]], [[File:Hegel.png]] [[w:Georg Hegel|Hegel]], etc. Along with this they offered their own analysis of Kafka based on both their philosophy of schizoanalysis and their philosophy of flux. They analyze without care for narratives, genere's, etc that find themselves at the crux of major analysis. Instead, they see Kafka's work as the start of the project of minor literature, a mode of analysis without the essentialism or reliance on socially constructed concepts. This is extended, just as it was with major philosophy, to the idea of minor philosophy, which they identify with thinkers such as [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Spinoza]], Nietzsche, and of course, themselves. Minor philosophy is philosophy that doesn't rely on crude reliance on set logic systems, but relies on ideas that are more rhizomatic.
 
''What is Philosophy?'' describes Deleuze and Guattari's notion of what philosophy is and what separates it from other subjects. While others have defined philosophy as simply thinking about big, more abstract, problems, Deleuze and Guattari define philosophy as the discipline in the business of creating concepts. This concept creation comes about whenever it is useful, for example, when Kant needed a concept to describe what he saw as a priori truths he invented the conept of the thing in itself. While this is a very simple definition to give to philosophy, Deleuze and Guattari go into the small details of how philosophy occurs and how it differentiates it from things such as art or science. The creation of concepts is based in a concept Deleuze and Guattari call the plane of immanence, a basis for which everything comes into being. This plane of immanence is not a concept itself but is instead a immanent creator of concepts, it holds no attributes yet creates in its process. The plane of immanence is characterized, as the name implies, by immanence. Immanence is the opposite of transcendence, meaning the state of being entirely within something. From the plane of immanence, concept creation and philosophy are engaged in. This creation is creative in the eyes of Deleuze and Guattari, comparing the process to the process of the artist.
Line 115 ⟶ 120:
 
===Fascism And Self Repression===
A large focus of [[File:Deleuze.png]] [[w:Gilles Deleuze|Deleuze]] and [[File:Guattari.png]] [[w:Felix Guattari|Guattari's]] work ''Anti-Oedipus'' is how one comes to desire their own repression rather then the freeing of desire. Many such as [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Spinoza]] have addressed this problem previously, with it becoming one of the major problems within political philosophy. In Deleuze and Guattari's time the main object of analysis for this phenomena was [[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism]], wich had convinced a wide swath of people to desire their own repression under the nation state. Deleuze and Guattari's focus was primarily on [[File:Freud.png]] [[w:Psychoanalysis|Freud's]] Oedipal complex and its update by [[File:Lacan.png]] [[w:Psychoanalysis|Lacan]]. They analyze how individuals in this complex come to desire their own repression in Freud's terms. The nuclear family is the main place where this repression thrives, with Deleuze and Guattari stating that the family is the agent by wich this complex is instilled, it being the main agent of psychological repression. The nuclear family segregates and stratifies the individual into controllable segments, ultimately giving them control. This mechanism is the basis of Deleuze's idea of the control society and Guattari's idea of world capitalism. These mechanisms are machines, they stratify this free desire into categories that make us desire our own repression. [[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism]] enforces its higherarchy, repression, etc onto the individual through this nuclear family, to Deleuze and Guattari the family is the main tool that capitalism uses to instill this psychological and social repression.
 
Deleuze and Guattari also analyze how this nuclear family, enforced by late Capitalism, leads to the creation of the oedipal complex. Unlike psychoanalysis, [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]] [[w:Schizoanalysis|Schizoanalysis]] does not see these complexes as essential but rather created through the social situation one is born into. According to Deleuze and Guattari, the family transmits the angst and repression of the parents onto the child. This is what creates this desiring anti-production. The family does not only instill this oppression in desire, it also disfigures it. This is what leads to the incestual tendencies of the Oedipal complex, which while they believe that Freud overstates this by a wide margin, still is created by the family in its operations. The same can be said for Lacan's extension of the 3+1 oedipal complex into the 4+n complex of desire as lack, which can also be said to be implemented primarily by the family. This critique of these institutions of repression leads Deleuze and Guattari to advocate for a radical freeing of desire by becoming more schizo, more deteritorialized, in our desires. Through this this repression is escaped and the free expression of oneself can occur.
 
===Machinic Analysis Of Capital===
[[File:Deleuze.png]] [[w:Gilles Deleuze|Deleuze]] and [[File:Guattari.png]] [[w:Felix Guattari|Guattari]] reject traditional [[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism|Marxist]] explanations of [[File:Cap.png]][[Capitalism]] as outdated, instead offering an analysis of capitalism as a political economy of desire. Just as the family instates the Oedipal complex as an abstract machine, capital itself is an abstract machine that regulates the flows of desire into its mechanisms. This machine is associated with the body of capital that Deleuze and Guattari identify in their analysis of deteritorialization. This abstract machine is comprised of smaller component machines such as financial institutions, companies, the state, etc. Desire is regulated into these institutions through these abstract machines, focusing desire on certain commodities, what Marx calls commodity fetishism, on work, etc. This is the same as the desire of self repression, just instead of the family it is world capitalism. Deleuze and Guattari view these phenomena as deeply interrelated.
 
Many after Deleuze and Guattari would make their own personal analysis building on what Deleuze and Guattari started. [[File:Postmodernicon.png]] [[w:Jean-François Lyotard|Lyotard]] in his book Libidinal Economy would expand on this from a [[File:PostMarxism.png]][[w:PostMarxism|Post-Marxist]] perspective, analyzing how workers desire their own oppression under capitalism and how the postmodern condition is created out of this. [[File:Landian Accelerationism.png]] [[Landian Accelerationism|Land]] would analyze these deteritorial flows of capital in his accelerationist philosophy, analyzing how acceleration of technocapital in the body of capital will create a technocapital singularity, a body without organs of capital. [[File:Acidcomf.png]] [[Acid Communism|Fisher]] analyzed ideological desire being constrained by the abstract machines of capital, creating the phenomena of capitalist realism.
 
===The Society Of Control===
 
===The Statist Co-option Of The War Machine===
[[File:Deleuze.png]] [[w:Gilles Deleuze|Deleuze]] and [[File:Guattari.png]] [[w:Felix Guattari|Guattari's]] concept of the war machine refers to a social force that operates outside the control of the state and challenges its monopoly on violence. The war machine can be seen as a positive force that disrupts and breaks down hierarchical structures, allowing for new and creative forms of social organization to emerge. However, the state has historically sought to co-opt the war machine and redirect its energy towards its own ends.
 
In their book ''A Thousand Plateaus'', Deleuze and Guattari discuss how the state has sought to control the war machine through a process of co-option. According to them, the state takes control of the war machine by absorbing its energy and redirecting it towards its own ends. The state does this by creating a standing army, which is subject to its control and operates according to its dictates. In this way, the state seeks to neutralize the disruptive potential of the war machine and turn it into a tool of domination. Deleuze and Guattari argue that this process of co-option is not limited to the military sphere, but extends to other areas of social life as well. They suggest that the state seeks to control all aspects of society through a range of institutions and techniques of power, including the police, the legal system, and the media. These institutions work together to create a system of social control that regulates and disciplines individuals, limiting their ability to challenge existing power structures.
 
The state's co-option of the war machine represents a fundamental threat to human freedom and creativity. By absorbing the energy of the war machine and redirecting it towards its own ends, the state stifles the potential for new and innovative forms of social organization to emerge. This process of co-option reinforces existing power structures and limits the possibilities for radical change.
 
===Deteritorialization And Proto-Accelerationism===
Line 179 ⟶ 192:
*[[File:Soul.png]] [[Soulism]] - You're a little bit too idealist for my taste but your wish to free desire from all strata is wonderful.
*[[File:Situ.png]] [[Situationism]] - We must never forget may 68.
*[[File:Existentialist Anarchism.png]] [[Existentialist Anarchism]] - AnarchismPeople andmisunderstand Philosophyyou, just like meKafka.
*[[File:Auton.png]] [[Autonomism]] - Negri is a great one.
 
===Frenemies===
*[[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism]] - Your analysis of capitalism is incrediblefruitful but I don't like your dialectics.
*[[File:Avar.png]] [[Avaritionism]] - Desire should be freed, sure, but this is psychotic.
*[[File:Annil.png]] [[Anarcho-Nihilism]] - Active nihilism is based, but why do you reject creation?
*[[File:Anego.png]] [[Anarcho-Egoism]] - You simply add nihilism to the dialectic, but I will remove the dialectic entirely!
*[[File:Landian Accelerationism.png]] [[Landian Accelerationism]] - My rather... extreme child. I like your analysis but your political ideas are concerning, to say the least.
*[[File:FreudCom.png]] {{PHB|Freudo-Marxism}} - I like that you mix Freud with Marx but we should move beyond both of them.
*[[File:MegaCorp.png]] [[Corporatocracy]] - GLADDEN, WHAT IN THE ACTUAL F...
 
===Enemies===
Line 200 ⟶ 216:
Mega Compass.png
Offcomp-libunitydialogue.png
</gallery>{{Navbox/Anarchists}}{{Navbox/Offcomp}}
 
{{Navbox/Offcomp}}
{{Navbox/Libunity}}
[[Category:Anarchists]]
396

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.