Particracy: Difference between revisions
→Conceptions
Polcompbot (talk | contribs) m (Added migration messagebox in preparation of February 10 move) |
|||
Line 1:
<blockquote>''Not to be confused with [[File:Pat.png]][[Patriarchy]].''</blockquote>
{{Ideology
Line 34 ⟶ 33:
[[File:Ingsocf.png]] [[Ingsoc]]<br>
[[File:Classfash.png]] [[Fascism|Italian Fascism]]<br>
[[File:Ittihad.png]] [[İttihadism|Ittihadism]]<br>
[[File:Jacobin.png]] [[Jacobinism]]<br>
[[File:Kaczysmf.png]] [[Paternalistic Conservatism|Kaczyzm]]<br>
Line 71 ⟶ 70:
===[[File:Twoparti.png]] Two-Party Systems===
Another way in which particracy has been historically and still currently implemented is in the form of a '''Two-Party System'''. Two-party systems are systems where two parties (usually one broadly left-leaning and one broadly right-leaning) dominate the political landscape, with power shifting back and forth between both. While other parties often hold some seats in the legislature, they are unlikely to be a significant enough bloc, with coalition governments being rare. Countries like the [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States are extreme examples where third party or independent representatives are almost non-existent at both the federal and state level. This has resulted in both parties having different ideological factions in the hopes of somewhat increasing political diversity and having a more broad appeal. This is usually the result of
===[[File:SemiAuthPar.png]] Dominant-Party System===
Line 77 ⟶ 76:
===[[File:SemiAuthPar.png]] Codominant-Party System===
A '''Codominant-Party System''' is when the same several, usually two, parties dominate politics for a long time. It can be seen as a weaker, informal version of the two-party system, however, the systems they operate in are still nominally democratic and either party can be replaced, but it is usually very hard as the result of a still primarily traditional first-past-the-post voting system, where high amounts of tactical voting due to it being a plurality-based system will result in most people only voting for one of the two parties (otherwise known as Duverger's law), but this isn't necessarily the case; codominant-party systems or characteristics of a codominant-party system can also sometimes be found in other voting systems, including some proportional systems, due to the rule of the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem that if a voting rule is neither dictatorial nor susceptible to tactical voting, it must limit the possible outcomes to two (relevant) alternatives only. Examples include the UK [[File:Con-t.png]] [[Conservatism|Conservative]]/[[File:UKLab.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labour]] [[Third Way|Party]], the Australian [[File:LiberalParty.png]] [[Conservative Liberalism|Liberal]]/[[File:ALP.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labor]] [[Third Way|Party]] (in the Senate), the New Zealand [[File:LabourNZ-icon.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labour]]/[[File:NationalNZ-icon.png]] [[Liberal Conservatism|National Party]], the South Korean [[File:PeoplePowerParty.png]] [[National Conservatism|People Power Party]]/[[File:DemocraticPartyKorea.png]] [[Big Tent Liberalism|Democratic Party of Korea]], the Taiwanese [[File:DPP-Taiwan.png]] [[National Liberalism|Democratic Progressive Party]]/[[File:RevRightKMT.png]] [[Tridemism|Kuomintang]], and the Spanish [[File:PSOE.png]] [[Social Democracy|Spanish Socialist Workers' Party]]/[[File:SpaPP.png]] [[Liberal Conservatism|People's Party]].
===Partitocrazia===
Line 97 ⟶ 96:
*[[File:Ingsocf.png]] [[Ingsoc]] - THE PARTY WOULD LIKE TO REMIND YOU-
*[[File:Parl.png]] [[Parliamentarianism]] - Your Westminster form especially is pretty based.
*[[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism|Marxism-Leninism]] - Exporting the one-party system around the world is based.
*[[File:IllibDem.png]] [[Illiberal Democracy]] - That's more like it...
*[[File:Jacobin.png]] [[Jacobinism]] - The Original Particrat.
Line 113 ⟶ 112:
*[[File:Gaddafi.png]] [[Gaddafism]] - You banned parties and you think you're democratic.
*[[File:Metaxi.png]] [[Metaxism]] - This idiot banned his own party.
*[[File:Lukash.png]] [[Social Authoritarianism|
*[[File:OchloAngry.png]] [[Ochlocracy]] - Direct democracy just went mad.
*[[File:Awaj.png]] [[Anarchism]] - You want no rule - cringe!
Line 139 ⟶ 138:
*[[File:Castro-PCC.png]] [[National Communism|Communist Party of Cuba]] [[File:Castro.png]]
*[[File:Polpot.png]] [[Pol Potism|Communist Party of Kampuchea]] [[File:KhmerRogue.png]]
*[[File:ML.png]] [[
*[[File:CommunistPartyVietnam.png]] [[Ho Chi Minh Thought|Communist Party of Vietnam]] [[File:Hochi.png]]
*[[File:BenAli.png]] [[Social Authoritarianism|Democratic Constitutional Rally]] [[File:Cball-Tunisia.png]]
Line 149 ⟶ 148:
*[[File:KPThought.png]] [[Ho Chi Minh Thought#Laos|Lao People's Revolutionary Party]] [[File:Cball-Laos.png]]
*[[File:Tito.png]] [[Titoism|League of Communists of Yugoslavia]] [[File:Cball-Yugoslavia.png]]
*[[File:MPP-Mongolia.png]] [[
*[[File:MPLA.png]] [[African Socialism|MP]][[Social Authoritarianism|LA]] [[File:Cball-Angola.png]]
*[[File:Classfash.png]] [[Fascism|National Fascist Party of Italy]] [[File:CBall-King-Italy.png]]
Line 159 ⟶ 158:
*[[File:Pahlavi.png]] [[Monarcho-Capitalism|Rastakhiz Party]] [[File:Cball-Iran-Pahlavi.png]]
*[[File:NicolaeCeausescu.png]] [[National Communism|Romanian Communist Party]] [[File:Cball-SRRomania.png]]
*[[File:Socialist Unity Party of Germany.png]] [[
*[[File:Juche.png]] [[Juche|Worker's Party of Korea]] [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]]
| |||