Jump to content

Particracy: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 68:
===[[File:UniParti.png]] One-Party States===
One way in which particracy has been historically implemented is in the form of a '''One-Party State'''. This is also the only form of particracy that is likely to be sincerely advocated for. One-party states are states governed by one major political party, and all other parties are either banned or hold little power. While one-party states have been led by parties of many different ideologies, some of the most common examples are countries led by [[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism|Marxist-Leninist]] (such as the [[File:Orthlen.png]] [[Leninism|Communist Party of the Soviet Union]], [[File:Dengf.png]] [[Dengism|the Communist Party of China]], and the [[File:Castro.png]] [[National Communism|Communist Party of Cuba]]), [[File:Baath.png]] [[Ba'athism|Ba'athist]] or [[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism|fascist]] (such as the [[File:Nazi.png]] [[Nazism|Nazi Party of Germany]], the [[File:Mussolini.png]] [[Fascism|National Fascist Party of Italy]], and the [[File:AusFash.png]] [[Austrofascism|Fatherland Front Party of Austria]]) parties.
====[[File:SemiAuthPar.png]] Dominant-Party System====
A '''Dominant-Party System''' is when one party dominates politics for a long time, allowing some degree of controlled opposition. It can be seen as a weaker, informal version of the one-party state, however, the systems they operate in are still nominally democratic and the party can be replaced, but it is usually very hard. Examples include [[File:PAP(Singapore).png]] [[Authoritarian Capitalism|People's Action Party of Singapore]], [[File:PRI.png]] [[Kleptocracy|Institutional Revolutionary Party of Mexico]] (historically), [[File:FIDESZ.png]] [[Right-Wing Populism|FIDESZ]], and [[File:PiS.png]] [[Paternalistic Conservatism|Law and Justice Party]].
 
===[[File:Twoparti.png]] Two-Party Systems===
Another way in which particracy has been historically and still currently implemented is in the form of a '''Two-Party System'''. Two-party systems are systems where two parties (usually one broadly left-leaning and one broadly right-leaning) dominate the political landscape, with power shifting back and forth between both. While other parties often hold some seats in the legislature, they are unlikely to be a significant enough bloc, with coalition governments being rare. Countries like the [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States are extreme examples where third party or independent representatives are almost non-existent at both the federal and state level. This has resulted in both parties having different ideological factions in the hopes of somewhat increasing political diversity and having a more broad appeal. This is usually the result of a traditional first-past-the-post voting system, where high amounts of tactical voting due to it being a plurality-based system will result in most people only voting for one of the two parties (otherwise known as Duverger's law), but this isn't necessarily the case; two-party systems or characteristics of a two-party system can also sometimes be found in other voting systems, including some proportional systems, due to the rule of the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem that if a voting rule is neither dictatorial nor susceptible to tactical voting, it must b. Prominent examples of two-party systems are the US [[File:Demcr.png]] [[Big Tent Liberalism|Democratic]]/[[File:RepubUS.png]] [[Conservatism|Republican Party]], the Polish [[File:PiS.png]] [[Paternalistic Conservatism|Law and Justice (PiS)]]/[[File:PO.png]] [[Social Capitalism|Civic Platform (PO)]], the Canadian [[File:TrudeauLib.png]] [[Social Liberalism|Liberal]]/[[File:CanadaConservative.png]] [[Neoconservatism|Conservative Party]], and the Australian [[File:LiberalParty.png]] [[Conservative Liberalism|Liberal]]/[[File:ALP.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labor]] [[Third Way|Party]] (in the House of Representatives).
====[[File:Parti.png]] Codominant-Party System====
 
A '''Codominant-Party System''' is when the same several, usually two, parties dominate politics for a long time. It can be seen as a weaker, informal version of the two-party system, howeverin other words, the case where two-party systems theyor operatecharacteristics inof area stilltwo-party nominallysystem democraticare andfound eitherin partyother canvoting be replacedsystems, butincluding itsome isproportional usuallysystems, verydue hard asto the resultrule of a still primarily first-past-the-post votingGibbard–Satterthwaite system,theorem wherethat highif amounts of tacticala voting duerule tois itneither beingdictatorial anor plurality-basedsusceptible systemto willtactical resultvoting, init mostmust peoplelimit onlythe votingpossible foroutcomes one of theto two parties (otherwiserelevant) knownalternatives as Duverger's law)only. Examples include the UK [[File:Con-t.png]] [[Conservatism|Conservative]]/[[File:UKLab.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labour]] [[Third Way|Party]], the Australian [[File:LiberalParty.png]] [[Conservative Liberalism|Liberal]]/[[File:ALP.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labor]] [[Third Way|Party]] (in the Senate), the New Zealand [[File:LabourNZ-icon.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labour]]/[[File:NationalNZ-icon.png]] [[Liberal Conservatism|National Party]], the South Korean [[File:PeoplePowerParty.png]] [[National Conservatism|People Power Party]]/[[File:DemocraticPartyKorea.png]] [[Big Tent Liberalism|Democratic Party of Korea]], the Taiwanese [[File:DPP-Taiwan.png]] [[National Liberalism|Democratic Progressive Party]]/[[File:RevRightKMT.png]] [[Tridemism|Kuomintang]], and the Spanish [[File:PSOE.png]] [[Social Democracy|Spanish Socialist Workers' Party]]/[[File:SpaPP.png]] [[Liberal Conservatism|People's Party]].
===[[File:SemiAuthPar.png]] Dominant-Party System===
A '''Dominant-Party System''' is when one party dominates politics for a long time, allowing some degree of controlled opposition. It can be seen as a weaker, informal version of the one-party state, however, the systems they operate in are still nominally democratic and the party can be replaced, but it is usually very hard. Examples include [[File:PAP(Singapore).png]] [[Authoritarian Capitalism|People's Action Party of Singapore]], [[File:PRI.png]] [[Kleptocracy|Institutional Revolutionary Party of Mexico]] (historically), [[File:FIDESZ.png]] [[Right-Wing Populism|FIDESZ]], and [[File:PiS.png]] [[Paternalistic Conservatism|Law and Justice Party]].
 
===[[File:Parti.png]] Codominant-Party System===
A '''Codominant-Party System''' is when the same several, usually two, parties dominate politics for a long time. It can be seen as a weaker, informal version of the two-party system, however, the systems they operate in are still nominally democratic and either party can be replaced, but it is usually very hard as the result of a still primarily first-past-the-post voting system, where high amounts of tactical voting due to it being a plurality-based system will result in most people only voting for one of the two parties (otherwise known as Duverger's law). Examples include the UK [[File:Con-t.png]] [[Conservatism|Conservative]]/[[File:UKLab.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labour]] [[Third Way|Party]], the Australian [[File:LiberalParty.png]] [[Conservative Liberalism|Liberal]]/[[File:ALP.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labor]] [[Third Way|Party]] (in the Senate), the New Zealand [[File:LabourNZ-icon.png]] [[Social Democracy|Labour]]/[[File:NationalNZ-icon.png]] [[Liberal Conservatism|National Party]], the South Korean [[File:PeoplePowerParty.png]] [[National Conservatism|People Power Party]]/[[File:DemocraticPartyKorea.png]] [[Big Tent Liberalism|Democratic Party of Korea]], the Taiwanese [[File:DPP-Taiwan.png]] [[National Liberalism|Democratic Progressive Party]]/[[File:RevRightKMT.png]] [[Tridemism|Kuomintang]], and the Spanish [[File:PSOE.png]] [[Social Democracy|Spanish Socialist Workers' Party]]/[[File:SpaPP.png]] [[Liberal Conservatism|People's Party]].
 
===Partitocrazia===
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.