User:SweatingCup2632: Difference between revisions

[[File:Keynes.png]] [[Keynesianism]] <br>

[[File:Authoritarian_Centrism.png]] [[Authoritarianism|Authoritarianism (Centre)]] <br>|influences=[[File:Nordmodel.png]] [[Nordic Model]] <br>

 

==Opinion concerning current conflicts and disputes==

My economic doctrine revolves around the concept of creating a stable, secure and profitable environment for businesses through policies designed to stimulate economic growth (such as subsidies, soft loans, crisis intervention at the discretion of companies...) and minimise the possibility of insolvency. These policies will be implemented in a way that balances a welfare state, with high public spending and high standards for wages. The sources of revenue for the state will be caused by expected economic growth and, consequently, GDP growth, and by a taxation system focused on a few progressive and universal taxes that are fair. I am pro-free market vis-à-vis nations with a market comparable or better than the national one, because there is no risk of them replacing yours, whereas with nations like China or India the tables are turned. The domestic market must always be the convenient one. As for inflation, it will be controlled through centralisation of the currency, coupled with bullish trading policies that follow the needs of the moment in a malleable and responsive manner, as well as rare shock appreciation policies in cases of very serious crises. Lastly, trade unions should not exist; they should be replaced by non-aligned semi-state associations that find the intersection between the interests of workers, the employer and, secondarily, the state.

 

I believe that [[File:Bankocracy.png|frameless]] [[Bankocracy|banks]] should play a fundamental role in the monetary stability of the country. Since my economic programme envisages fast economic growth, it is important to keep inflation at acceptable levels (3% at the most). Therefore, banks will have to constantly adapt their programmes to the current economic scenario in order to maintain a perpetual inflationary equilibrium.

 

Alas, regulationism in history has caused some trouble, and all (or most) of it for one reason: regulationism was run cumbersomely. The policies implemented most of the time were incompatible with the natural functioning of the market, often leading to a sick and dependent market on the decidedly not eternal subsidies. In my view, however, interventionism must have the dual purpose of welfare and economic growth. For example, if you need to hire people in an area, you focus on the most productive sectors by going along with financial forecasts and thus giving the initial financial boost to a growth process that must be autonomous.

 

*[[File:Necon.png|frameless]] [[Neoconservatism]] - You have good fiscal and diplomatic policies, just be more interventionist. Also, we both dislike [[File:Hippie.png|frameless]] [[Revolutionary Progressivism|him]].

*[[File:Georgist.png|frameless]] [[Georgism]] - Anti-monopolist ideology with only one main tax based on equality among tributaries? I'm writing that down!

*[[File:Diarchy.png|frameless]] [[Diarchy]] - How do you two always get along?

*[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png|frameless]] [[Neoliberalism]] - You're the worse version of [[File:Necon.png|frameless]] [[Neoconservatism|him]], but I don't feel like I hate you

*[[File:Sweatingcup.png|frameless]] [[User:SweatingCup2632|'''Me''']] - Seriously, my policies are kinda unique

 

 

*[[File:Soc.png|frameless]] [[Socialism]] - Tax the rich? Universal Basic Income?? DISCOURAGING INVESTMENTS??? What drugs are you on?! Well, at least we agree on the social part...

*[[File:Fut2.png|frameless]] [[Futurism]] - You had potential, yet you're just the son of [[File:Accel.png|frameless]] [[Accelerationism|him]] and [[File:Ultranat.png|frameless]] [[Ultranationalism|him]]

 

*[[File:KaiserKlaus.png|frameless]] [[User:KaiserKlausMouse|KaiserKlausMouse]] - He's a [[File:Monsoc.png|frameless]] [[Monarcho-Socialism|monarcho-socialist]], but hey, at least we agree on [[File:Sec.png|frameless]] [[authoritarianism]], [[File:Deepe.png|frameless]] [[Deep Ecology|enviornmentalism]] and disliking [[File:Apolit.png|frameless]] [[apoliticism]] (also he has a really cool profile page)

*[[File:Christianright.png|frameless]] [[UserWiki:SomeCrusader1224|SomeCrusader1224]] - Economic Policies? Good! Immigration Policies? Not bad. Social and Religious Policies? Meh...

*[[File:Menslib.png|frameless]] [[Men's Liberation]] - I support people's choices, but DAMN...

 

*[[File:ReactionaryCentrism6.png|frameless]] [[UserWiki:Bannned|Bannned]] - He's insane, this is probably not what Jesus would have wanted

*[[File:Neoairisu.png|frameless]] [[UserWiki:SumisuAirisu|Neoairisu]] - I put you under the [[File:ReactionaryCentrism6.png|frameless]] [[UserWiki:Bannned|liturgy-obsessed]], ironic, isn't it? Seriously, you hate [[File:Cap.png|frameless]] [[capitalism]], [[File:Sec.png|frameless]] [[authoritarianism]], [[File:Commie.png|frameless]] [[Communism|communists]], [[File:Ancapf.png|frameless]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|ancaps]], [[File:Kemal.png|frameless]] [[Kemalism|Kemalists]] and [[File:Erdoğanism.png|frameless]] [[Neo-Ottomanism|Erdoğanists]]?

*[[File:Doomercrusader.png|frameless]] [[UserWiki:DoomerCrusader|DoomerCrusader]] - Either anti-monopoly or [[File:Corptism.png|frameless]] [[Corporatism|corpocratic]], choose one. Also, wages in national socialism didn't increase at all, and during the war, they even went down, in Italy wages plummeted as well, proof that corpocracy doesn't work. You have a somewhat populistic view of class collaboration, please read what I wrote about corpocracy

 

My mother: [[File:Socdem.png|frameless]] [[Social Democracy]]

 

A classmate I despise: [[File:Swhf.png|frameless]] [[Socialism|Socialism with human face]]

 

 

*[[File:Bidenism.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden Joe Biden] - You're too friendly with the unions, as you've been cosponsor of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_Free_Choice_Act Employee Free Choice Act], and you also like taxes a lot!

*[[File:FIDESZ.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Orb%C3%A1n Viktor Orbán] - Read what I said for Putin, you staunch [[File:Oligarchy.png|frameless]] [[Oligarchy|oligarch]]

*[[File:Erdoğanism.png|frameless]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recep_Tayyip_Erdo%C4%9Fan Recep Tayyip Erdoğan] - The Ottoman Empire is dead now, when will you understand?

 

==Opinion concerning current issues==

 

In my opinion, making a distinction between the rights of heterosexuals and all others is like making a distinction between light and dark hair. I see absolutely no reason why a homosexual couple should not enjoy the same rights as a heterosexual one. On the other hand, if you exhibit something obscene during a demonstration, LGBTQ+ or not, it is obscene.

 

I will only say that homosexual couples cannot adopt a child if someone presents me with the results of a trustworthy study stating the 'abnormality' of children raised by homosexual couples.

 

Preventing abortion means denying a woman the human and fundamental right to be the master of her own body. I would only prevent abortion if too long after conception

 

Personally, I don't live in the US, and my country doesn't spend that much on the military, but as far as the yanks are concerned, you can only afford to spend that much money on the military if you have first solved all the internal deficiencies, and as things stand, [https://www.heritage.org/americas-biggest-issues you are far from that goal].

 

Everyone who has attended college knows what it means to have to save a lifetime to pay for tuition, books and accommodation. I am referring to you, O student who has fallen into the hands of [[File:Soc.png|frameless]] [[socialism]] after these bad experiences, try to look at everything more objectively. Imposing a price cut would cause serious problems for the economy and in the long run would only make you poorer.

 

Oof, hot topic. Immigration must be regularised first. For immigrants, I would have in mind a special plan to enable them in the country in the short term, helping them to find work. The immigrant, once he has found employment, would have to repay the debt he has accrued to the state, but in a rather unimpressive way. However, if the immigrant refuses or does not show enough commitment, we will be forced to find him/her temporary accommodation before re-impatriating him/her. We are good, yes, but we are not fools

 

The right to profess one's faith is constitutional, so both state atheism and imposed state religion are anti-constitutional. I can put up with states that have an official religion, but tolerate other faiths as well, in order to preserve their historical identity, which, like it or not, is part of the history of almost every country. I believe that religion should be protected as a cultural asset, in the case of my country, therefore, the Catholic religion, which, objectively, has been and still is a large part of our culture.

 

I would simply apply the aforementioned principles to gradually push companies to invest in renewable (or nuclear) resources without them having economic losses

 

If economically the more countries are united, the better, militarily, I think it is important to preserve a safe environment for our nation, even through arms sales or direct military involvement.

 

At this point we are all sure that globalisation is inevitable, but not unmanageable. Economic globalisation must be shaped according to the needs of the nation and its citizens. This means making sure the national market does have the upper hand, but with foreign markets also having the power, through competition, to shape prices in favour of the consumers and growth.

 

We all know Rome, the cultural cradle of Europe for years and years. And it is this feeling, this desire to return to being the cultural beacon of Europe, that separates me from pure [[File:Progress.png|frameless]] [[progressivism]]. Of course, I don't have the territorial holdings of the Roman Empire, but some territories surely belong to the state of Italy: Istria, Savoy, Nice and the Ticino area. For the rest, in my opinion, the new meaning of restoring the Roman Empire is to become the jewel of Europe, culturally, economically and socially.

 

 

 

Economic [[File:Leftunity.png]] [[:Category:Left Unity|Left]]/[[:Category:Right Unity|Right]] [[File:Rightunity-yellow.png]]: 1.0