Post-Anarchism: Difference between revisions
From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Moved links to new page names
No edit summary |
Polcompbot (talk | contribs) m (Moved links to new page names) |
||
Line 49:
[[File:Frankfurt.png]] [[Frankfurt School]] (Critical Theory)<br>
[[File:Existentialist Anarchism.png]] [[Existentialist Anarchism]]<br>
[[File:Anpostleft.png]] [[Post-
[[File:Antao.png]] [[Taoist Anarchism]]<br>
[[File:Anego.png]] [[Anarcho-Egoism]]<br>
Line 55:
[[File:Goldman.png]] [[Ego-Communism|Goldmanism]]<br>
|sub = *[[File:TAZ.png]] '''TAZism''' {{Collapse|
**[[File:Anpostleft.png]] [[Post-
**[[File:Anin.png]] [[Anarcho-Individualism]]
**[[File:Insan2.png]] [[Insurrectionary Anarchism|Autonomous Zones]]
Line 67:
**[[File:Thar.png]] [[w:Discourse on Voluntary Servitude|Involuntary Servitude]]
**[[File:Lacan.png]] [[w:Psychoanalysis|Lacanian Psychoanalysis]]
**[[File:AnOnto.png]] [[Post-
**[[File:CarlSchmitt.png]] [[w:Political theology|Political Theology]]
**[[File:Nietzsche.png]] [[Anti-Humanism|Politics of Ressentiment]]
Line 74:
}}
*[[File:AnOnto.png]] '''Ontological Anarchism''' {{Collapse|
**[[File:Anpostleft.png]] [[Post-
**[[File:Annil.png]] [[Anarcho-Nihilism]]
**[[File:TAZ.png]] [[Post-
}}
*[[File:PostModAn.png]] '''Post-Modern Anarchism''' {{Collapse|
Line 116:
In layman's terms, Post-anarchism is not a single coherent theory, but rather refers to the combined works of any number of post-modernists and post-structuralists such as Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Lacan, Jacques Derrida, Jean Baudrillard; postmodern feminists such as Judith Butler; and alongside those of classical anarchist and libertarian philosophers such as Zhuang Zhou, Emma Goldman, Max Stirner, and Friedrich Nietzsche. Thus, the terminology can vary widely in both approach and outcome.
==History ==
The term "post-anarchism" was coined by philosopher of [[File:Anpostleft.png]] [[Post-
The "Lacanian anarchism" proposed by Saul Newman utilizes the works of Jacques Lacan and [[File:Anego.png]] [[Anarcho-Egoism|Max Stirner]] more prominently. Newman criticizes classical anarchists, such as [[File:Acol.png]] [[Anarcho-Collectivism|Mikhail Bakunin]] and [[File:Socan2.png]] [[Social Anarchism|Peter Kropotkin]], for assuming an objective "human nature" and natural order; he argues that from this approach, humans progress and are well-off by nature, with only the Establishment as a limitation that forces behavior otherwise. For Newman, this is a worldview that depicts the reversal of [[File:Fishe.png]] [[Authoritarian Conservatism|Thomas Hobbes']] Leviathan, in which the "good" state is subjugated by the "evil" people.
Line 149:
===Friends===
*[[File:Anego.png]] [[Anarcho-Egoism]] - "What Stirner says is a word, a thought, a concept; what he means is no word, no thought, no concept. What he says is not what is meant, and what he means is unsayable." - Max Stirner
*[[File:Anpostleft.png]] [[Post-
*[[File:Annil.png]] [[Anarcho-Nihilism]] - Our crushing futility is possibly the most freeing aspect of our existence.
*[[File:Antao.png]] [[Taoist Anarchism]] - The anarchy that can be spoken is not the anarchy.
|