Talk:Neoconservatism: Difference between revisions
From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
(→test: new section) Tag: Reverted |
(→test) Tag: Manual revert |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I'm not a neocon. But i know what a neocon is when i see one. In my eyes,Necons are basically capitalist,small-government,socially conservative-type stuff with an interventionist foreign policy. Reagan and the Bushes,basically. Well,this page thinks 'neocon' just means interventionism. Just move this page to a new place and call it 'Interventionism' or something like that. --[[User:EatinTooHighOnTheHog|EatinTooHighOnTheHog]] ([[User talk:EatinTooHighOnTheHog|talk]]) 08:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC) |
I'm not a neocon. But i know what a neocon is when i see one. In my eyes,Necons are basically capitalist,small-government,socially conservative-type stuff with an interventionist foreign policy. Reagan and the Bushes,basically. Well,this page thinks 'neocon' just means interventionism. Just move this page to a new place and call it 'Interventionism' or something like that. --[[User:EatinTooHighOnTheHog|EatinTooHighOnTheHog]] ([[User talk:EatinTooHighOnTheHog|talk]]) 08:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
*Absolutely agreed (except on the small government stuff), this page misrepresents Neoconservatism so badly, I would still definitely say the interventionist foreign policy is its most defining feature when put up against other conservative ideologies. It still definitely needs to be rewritten (and debloated). -[[User:Aycee Lovelace|Aycee Lovelace <3]] ([[User talk:Aycee Lovelace|talk]]) 09:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC) |
*Absolutely agreed (except on the small government stuff), this page misrepresents Neoconservatism so badly, I would still definitely say the interventionist foreign policy is its most defining feature when put up against other conservative ideologies. It still definitely needs to be rewritten (and debloated). -[[User:Aycee Lovelace|Aycee Lovelace <3]] ([[User talk:Aycee Lovelace|talk]]) 09:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
== test == |
|||
s |
Revision as of 09:28, 19 July 2023
The misrepresantation is just so bad
I'm not a neocon. But i know what a neocon is when i see one. In my eyes,Necons are basically capitalist,small-government,socially conservative-type stuff with an interventionist foreign policy. Reagan and the Bushes,basically. Well,this page thinks 'neocon' just means interventionism. Just move this page to a new place and call it 'Interventionism' or something like that. --EatinTooHighOnTheHog (talk) 08:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Absolutely agreed (except on the small government stuff), this page misrepresents Neoconservatism so badly, I would still definitely say the interventionist foreign policy is its most defining feature when put up against other conservative ideologies. It still definitely needs to be rewritten (and debloated). -Aycee Lovelace <3 (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)