Talk:Paleolibertarianism

Welcome to Paleolibertarianism's talk page!

This is the talk page for Paleolibertarianism. Everyone must follow these rules to keep those pages in order.

• Read the Wiki Guidelines and Wikia's Terms of Service before you interact with the wiki and the talk pages.
• Stay on topic. This page is about Paleolibertarianism. Never go off-topic.
• Talk pages are for discussion, not for joking and shitposting.
• In your topic, provide your Wikia signature and the full date before your message. This can be done by typing ~~~~.
• Do not reply to topics that have ended or haven't had a response in a while, also known as gravedigging.

Topics that break any of those rules will be removed and repeated offenses will result in punishment.

Why I moved Jones

Jones is more famous for his right-wing conspiracy theorism combined with his opposition to the government. Paleolibertarianism is just an anti-interventionist version of Libertarian Conservatism, and Jones isn't that famous for his opposition to foreign aid. Natbert is a combination of Rightpop and Libertarianism, and that description fits Jones perfectly. FanOfWolves (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Whether to consider Lauren Chen a Russophile

It's too much to have it be her icon, but it's definitely still a thing that her company got exposed for. Also, the user that removed it has a bit of a history of biased editing. I opened this discussion to make it so there's a place for us to discuss it. - FanOfWolves (talk) 22:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

"Biased editing" you say? Like what? Nevermind!
Still, "her company got exposed" by who and how? Any claims of USA's media and government are no proof for me, living in country in witch saying "You are russian agent" is synonymous with saying "I don't agree with you" made me too cynical to such claims. And even if it could be true (I doubt it) there is huge difference between company and its workers, changing her into some rusophile (and I know how much you, FanOfWolves, love to call everyone as rusophile without any concrete proof nor evidence) is pure slander. - DrBlueGun (talk) 23:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

I was referring to the edit in which you put the Pedobert icon as the icon for Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism. Also, she owns the company, and isn't just a member. - FanOfWolves (talk) 23:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Just being ignorant and not acknowledging the fact of usage of word "Pedolibkizm" as polish term to describe progressive, therefore childish, libertarians, only puts you in bad light. And everywhere I have looked it was mentioned she IS NOT an owner nor partial owner NOR that if any money transfer even had any place as it is described as ALLEGED. - DrBlueGun (talk) 00:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)