Jump to content

Tridemism: Difference between revisions

5,344 bytes added ,  17 days ago
No edit summary
(18 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 36:
[[File:Cball-ROC.png]] Republic of China Model
}}
|alignments = [[File:CentreAuthLeftCenterAuthLeft.png|link=:Category:Centrists]] [[:Category:Centrists|{{Color|#C0C0C0|'''Center-'''}}]]-[[:Category:Authoritarian Left|AuthLeft{{Color|#F9BABA|'''Authoritarian Left'''}}]] to {{Info|Left Unity|LeftUnity}} ([[File:Sun Yat-Sen.png]] Sun Yat-sen Thought) <br> [[File:Cultcenter.png|link=:Category:Cultural Center]] [[:Category:Cultural Center|{{Color|#8BC34A|'''Culturally'''}} {{Color|#9D22B2|'''Variable'''}}]] ([[File:Sun Yat-Sen.png]] Sun Yat-sen Thought and [[File:RevRightKMT.png]] Revisionist Right-Wing KMT) <br>
[[File:Cultcenter.png|link=:Cultural Center]] [[:Category:Cultural Center|Culturally Variable]] ([[File:Sun Yat-Sen.png]] Sun Yat-sen Thought and [[File:RevRightKMT.png]] Revisionist Right-Wing KMT) <br>
{{Info|Nationalists}}<br>
{{Info|Welfarists}} <br>
Line 47 ⟶ 46:
{{Info|Authoritarian Left|AuthLeft}}([[File:LeftKMT.png]] Left-Wing KMT) <br>
{{Info|Authoritarian Unity|AuthUnity}}([[File:RightKMT.png]] Orthodox Right-Wing KMT) <br>
[[File:Cright.png|link=:Category:Centrists]] [[:Category:Centrists|{{Color|#C0C0C0|'''Center-'''}}]]-[[:Category:Right_Unity|Right{{Color|#F5F5A9|'''Rig'''}}]][[:Category:Right_Unity|{{Color|#93DAF8|'''ht'''}}]] ([[File:RevRightKMT.png]] Revisionist Right-Wing KMT) <br>
[[File:ModTrad.png|link=:Category:Cultural Center]] [[:Category:Cultural Center|{{Color|#8BC34A|'''Culturally Center-'''}}]]-[[:Category:Culturally Right|{{Color|#8BC34A|'''Right'''}}]] ([[File:RightKMT.png]] Right-Wing KMT) <br>
{{Info|Culturally Left}}([[File:LeftKMT.png]] Left-Wing KMT) <br>
{{Info|Socialists}}([[File:Sun Yat-Sen.png]] Sun Yat-sen Thought and [[File:LeftKMT.png]] Left-Wing KMT) <br>
Line 94 ⟶ 93:
**[[File:GeoSoc.png]] [[Geosyndicalism|Socialist Georgism]]
}}
|personal =
 
|school =
<blockquote>'''Individuals'''</blockquote>
*[[File:ChiangKaiShek2.png]] '''Chiangism/Chiang Kai-shek Thought''' [[File:ChiangKaiShek.png]] {{Collapse|
**[[File:Anticommunism.png]] {{PCBA|Anti-Communism}} (Post-Canton coup)
Line 148 ⟶ 145:
**[[File:Anti-Colonial.png]] {{PCBA|Anti-Colonialism}}
**[[File:Antiimp.png]] {{PCBA|Anti-Imperialism}}
**[[File:SoclibDemsocstar.png]] [[SocialDemocratic LiberalismSocialism]]
**[[File:SyndieSam.png]] [[Syndicalism|Laborism]]
**[[File:NalibLeftnat.png]] [[NationalLeft-Wing LiberalismNationalism]]
**[[File:Soclib.png]] [[Social Liberalism]]
**[[File:Fed.png]] [[Federalism|Taiwanese Autonomism]]
}}
Line 190 ⟶ 187:
**[[File:Natcon.png]] [[National Conservatism]]
}}
|school =
<blockquote>'''Groups'''</blockquote>
*[[File:China-blueshirt.png]] '''Blue Shirts Society''' {{Collapse|
**[[File:AntiAm.png]] Anti-Americanism
Line 199 ⟶ 196:
**[[File:Anti-Christian.png]] Christophobia
**[[File:RightKMT.png]] [[Authoritarian Conservatism|Conservative Tridemism]]
**[[File:Chinese Fash.png]] [[Fascism|Chinese Fascism]] (Self-proclaimed)(debatable){{Refn|Several historians, including Paul Jackson, Roger Griffin, Stanley payne, Maria Chang, and Cyprian Balmires, have classified the Blue Shirt Society as a ‘fascistic’ ultra-nationalist group rather than a ‘fascist’ one, implying an orientation towards, but not complete integration into, fascism. Blamires, Cyprian; Jackson, Paul (2006). World Fascism: A-K. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 9781576079409.|group=Note}} <ref>In 1972, Yi Laoyi, associate professor of history at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, wrote "Fascism in Kuomintang China: The Blue Shirts" ("Fascism in Kuomintang China: The Blue Shirts"), which was published in the spring issue of " China Quarterly " [17 ] ; Deng Wenyi and Qian Guoxun , one of the founders of Lixingshe, were "very angry" after reading it. They believed that Yi Laoyi had "insulted" the national revolutionary movement and described Lixingshe as a fascist organization as an "unwarranted fallacy" [2] .
 
Deng Yuanzhong (son of Deng Wenyi, who was teaching at Marist College in New York , USA) was persuaded by Deng Wenyi to write a book about Lixingshe, interviewing fifty-six members of Lixingshe, Fuxingshe and insiders and the Party History Committee of the Central Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang According to archival information, in the political atmosphere of Taiwan in the 1970s, Chiang Kai-shek's acquiescence was required to proceed smoothly. In 1984, Deng Yuanzhong returned to Taiwan from the United States as a professor and published "History of the Three People's Principles Lixing Society"; in 2000, he published a 582-page revised version of "The Truth about the Core Organizations of the Kuomintang - Lixing Society, Fuxing Society and the so-called "Blue Clothes Society" Evolution and Growth" [2] .
 
Deng Yuanzhong advocated that Lixingshe had three significances in the history of the Republic of China [2] :
 
Lixingshe and Chiang Kai-shek: The formation of Lixingshe was in line with the needs of Chiang Kai-shek and Zhongzheng to unify the country at that time. With the strategy of "all strategies should be carried out with the cooperation of openness and secrets", it emphasized the support of Chiang Zhongzheng to become "the supreme authority and center of belief in the minds of the whole country." ”; it was disbanded in 1938 when “it grew too large and lost its function of matching darkness with light.”
Lixingshe and the Kuomintang: In the 1930s, the Chinese Kuomintang's "organization was lax and its revolutionary spirit was scattered." Lixingshe "stimulated the original organization of the Kuomintang, causing them to actively rectify and compete with each other." Therefore, under the leadership of Chiang Kai-shek, Lixingshe "completed Work with ideals and strength to protect the party and save the country."
Lixingshe and the process of China's modernization: Lixingshe was responsible for and participated in important movements in the 1930s, such as the Internal Peace Movement, the National Economic Construction Movement, the National Military Training Movement, and the New Life Movement, etc., which helped to enhance the national consciousness of the youth at that time and their understanding of the country. Gain an understanding of the situation.
Yi Laoyi wrote a special article introducing Deng Yuanzhong's research and publication as "one of the most objective research results on the history of the Kuomintang rule that has been published in Taiwan", and it is actually "an extraordinary perspective on Chinese politics in the 1930s"; and Taiwan's academic circles also It is considered that this book is "the only "History of Lixing Society" written systematically and based on facts in the past fifty years" [2] .
 
Lin Yutang also defended the Nationalist government. He believed that the government's censorship of foreign journalists in Chongqing was no more serious than the censorship of foreign journalists by the U.S. government. Because we are in the middle of a war, and for fear that such reports criticizing the United States will be intercepted by enemy countries and used for propaganda purposes, some things cannot be helped. Lin Yutang also pointed out that the Nationalist government was paternalistic, not fascist. The Nationalist Government was eager to guide the people's thoughts and actions, but it did not strictly control thoughts, nor did it impose a rule of force or terror. The reaction of the people under a paternalistic regime is anger or a knowing smile; while the reaction of the people under a totalitarian rule is a whisper, secret fear, frightened submission, and the whole nation sings praises of the government. Patriarchal regimes can be saved, but totalitarian regimes are incurable. If you want to see real totalitarianism, you must go to Yan'an. Lin Yutang said that if there had not been a strong national government during the War of Resistance, but a more democratic and loose government like France, China's combat capabilities might have collapsed due to domestic divisions. [18] [19]</ref><ref>https://www.jstor.org/stable/652907?searchText=&searchUri=&ab_segments=&searchKey=&refreqid=fastly-default%3A6516d84be59f67769fa7a987f5d0453f&seq=2</ref>
**[[File:Corptism.png]] [[Corporatism]]
**[[File:Freemason .png]] Freemasonry<ref>[https://www.amazon.com/Spymaster-Dai-Chinese-Secret-Service/dp/0520234073 ''"Spymaster Dai Li and the Chinese Secret Service"''] by Frederic Wakeman Jr., Amazon.com. </ref>
Line 250 ⟶ 258:
**[[File:Huhanmin.png]] [[National Conservatism|Western Hills Group]] (Original)
}}
*[[File:RevRightKMT.png]] '''Revisionist Right-Wing TridemismKuomintang/Taiwanese Pan-Blue''' {{Collapse|
**[[File:AntiDPP.png]] Anti-Taiwanese Independence
**[[File:ROCRestoration.png]] [[Pan-Nationalism|Chinese Unification]]
Line 306 ⟶ 314:
|theorists =
*[[File:3princ.png]] '''Main''' {{Collapse|
**[[File:Sun Yat-Sen.png]] '''[[Republicanism|Sun]] [[Civic Nationalism|Yat]][[Progressive Conservatism|-sen]]''' (1866-1925)
**[[File:Republicanismpix.png]] [[Republicanism|Lu Haodong]] (1868-1895)
**[[File:Strato-Antifurry.png]] [[Stratocracy|Huang Xing]] (1874-1916)
Line 492 ⟶ 500:
Roughly translates to [[File:Dem.png]] [[Democracy|Civil Rights]], this principle stated that instead of having an Emperor to rule China, all Chinese people should be his own Emperor under a democratic system, which citizens have the right to vote and influence politic via democratic means. It also added two more branches--[[w:Control_Yuan|Control Yuan]] and [[w:Examination_Yuan|Examination Yuan]] -- to more commonly adapted tripartite of power separation due to China's political tradition.
 
===[[File:Soc-hWelf.png]] [[SocialismWelfarism|民生]] [[Socialism|Mínshēng]] [[File:Soc-h.png]] (Welfare/Socialism)===
Roughly translates to [[File:Welf.png]] [[Welfarism|"Doctrine of Livelihood"]], or [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism]] more broadly. While Sun Yat-sen stated in a 1924 speech that "’Mínshēng’ is [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism]]." and even at times calls his proposed policies [[File:Commie.png]] Communist, he was opposed to the [[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism|Marxist]] definitions of "class struggle" and "surplus value" as well as [[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism|Russian style communism]], saying "The Soviet system in Russia is not pure communism but Marxism — and Marxism is not communism; the real communism comes from Proudhon and Bakunin." Despite this, he still chose Lenin's style of party structure for the Kuomintang.
 
Sun Yat-sen instead defined Mínshēng as a doctrine of "people's livelihood, social existence, national economy, and group life." (ibid)
Line 599 ⟶ 607:
*[[File:Mao.png]] [[Maoism|毛澤東思想]] (Except for [[File:LeftKMT.png]] Left-Wing KMT & [[File:RCCK.png]] RCCK that supports Mao) - YOU KILLED AT LEAST 40 MILLION PEOPLE! '''MY PEOPLE!''' [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Th0Ehv-xVQs PREPARE TO BE ELIMINATED.] Also, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1C97ZRI6AsA Without the Nationalist Party, there would be no New China].
*[[File:Dengf.png]] [[Dengism|中國特色社會主義]] ([[File:RightKMT.png]] Right-Wing KMT) - Haha Three Noes campaign go brrrrrr.
*[[File:Dengf.png]] [[Dengism|中國特色社會主義]] & [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]] {{PCBA|Xi Jinping Thought|習近平思想}} ([[File:3princLib.png]] Liberal Tridemism) - DEATH TO CHINAZIS WHO STOLE OUR FATHERLAND!!!
*[[File:Ethnonat.png]] [[Ethnonationalism|族裔民族主義]] - I enacted a quota system for ethnic minorities such as Tibetans and Uyghurs and later Indigenous Taiwanese as part of my educational policy.<ref>[https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh/特種身分學生成績優待 特種身分學生成績優待], Wikipedia (Chinese)</ref>
*[[File:Hoxha.png]] [[Hoxhaism|霍查主義]] (Except for [[File:LeftKMT.png]] Left-Wing KMT & [[File:RCCK.png]] RCCK) - You kicked me out from the UN!
*[[File:Truman.png]] [[Social Liberalism|Harry 哈裡·S. Truman·杜魯門]] - I hate you because your illusions about the [[File:Mao.png]] [[Maoism|CCP]] caused us to lose all of China! <s>It is definitely not caused by us losing the support of the people because we are too corrupt!</s>
 
==Gallery==
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.