Universal Monarchism: Difference between revisions
→Royal judgement in progress
Line 146:
*[[File:Feud.png]] [[Feudalism]] - Way back in the past we worked together in the HRE but it ended up causing border gore.
*[[File:World_Federalism2.png]] [[World Federalism]] - I am not sure if you intend on keeping me around. And you don't support my absolutist tendencies either.
*[[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] [[Pan-Nationalism]] - You're good for initial imperial momentum, uniting the immediate nations of say the
*[[file:3way.png]] [[Third Way]] - Trudeau and Blair technically support both monarchy and globalization. Still, you're too limited and not dedicated enough as you support the King only as a figurehead (not even a global one) and you limit yourself to economic globalism. But [[File:Cball-Commonwealth.png]] pan-Anglicist cooperation between the states in personal union is a good stepping stone (see above).
*[[File:Showa.png]] [[Showa Statism]] - Your deeds were inconceivably horrible and directly caused by nationalism, but pan-Asianism is another stepping stone.
*[[file:World.png]] [[Globalism]] - What's different between you and me, is that you're unorganized, mostly economic, and have few long-term goals. While I believe that eventually, some institution will conquer the world, I intend for that to be me, making it last indefinitely and making something of the power that comes with it.
*[[File:Catheo.png]] [[Catholic Theocracy]] - You hold dominion over 1.3 billion people, but you directly control only a [[File:Urb.png]] tiny piece of land. Not to mention some degree of religious tolerance is needed for global unity.
**[[File:Catheo.png]] Learn from Dante, the Eastern Roman Empire, and Charles V, that if you give up every identity including a common religion, you can't hold an empire together, especially not by divine right if, in the process, you literally give it up!
===Speedbumps against world conquest===
| |||