m
no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 7:
|title=[[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism
|image=Ancap.png
|caption= "
|aliases=
{{
[[File:Ancapf.png]] AnCap<br>
[[File:Anarcho-Capitalism.png]] Capitalist Anarchism<br>
Line 34:
[[File:Minarchist.png]] [[Minarchism]]’s crazy brother<br>
Free Market Absolutism<br>
[[File:Cospaia.png]] Cospaian Model<br>
[[File:IceCommon.png]] Icelandic Commonwealth Model<br>
Line 369 ⟶ 367:
While this topic has no disagreements among Anarcho-Capitalists, there are some disagreements among [[File:libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|libertarians]]. The general consensus in more recent times is that intellectual property is not a legitimate form of property, and shouldn't be protected as actual property rights of concrete goods.
The main libertarian proponent against intellectual property is [[File:Hoppef.png]] [[Hoppeanism|Stephan Kinsella]], among others such as [[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School|Jeffrey Tucker]] and [[File:LeftRothbardianismPix.png]] [[Left-Rothbardianism|Roderick T. Long]], who writes<ref>[https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf Against Intellectual Property] by Stephan Kinsell</ref> that the [[File:
[[File:Rothbard.png]] Murray Rothbard takes the stance that intellectual property may actually hinder innovation, opposed to what most proponents of it seem to think, but this is just an economics stance. Politically, he argues that "infinite copyright contracts" would arise in an Anarcho-Capitalist society (and they could only arise if voluntarily agreed), and no government would be required to uphold these contracts as they would be upheld by private agencies.
Line 380 ⟶ 378:
===Immigration===
This issue is and has historically been quite controversial,
The other side of the argument is mostly made up of [[File:Prog-u.png]] [[Progressivism|progressives]] [[File:bhl.png]] and the culturally left, there are the [[File:libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|libertarians]] that favour open borders and free immigration in state systems, with some few also proposing this for an '''Anarcho-Capitalist''' society. It's worth noting that Murray Rothbard initially favoured this last position, opening the think-tank "Cato Institute" for promoting this idea in a libertarian perspective, which nowadays still does, but his ideas would later shift to the conception of private property borders and the more "rightist" position<ref name="nat">[https://mises.org/library/nations-consent Nations by Consent] by Murray Rothbard; 1994</ref> that would very influential in the [[File:plcn2.png]] [[Paleoconservatism|Paleo]][[Paleolibertarianism|-Alliance]] [[File:paleolib.png]] circles, taking for example the Paleolibertarian think-tank Mises Institute and Rothbard's pupil, [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Hoppeanism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]]<ref>https://mises.org/library/case-free-trade-and-restricted-immigration-0</ref><ref>https://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/hans-hermann-hoppe/on-free-immigration-and-forced-integration/</ref>.
===The method to Achieve an Anarcho-Capitalist Society===
* [[File:Right Reformism.png]] [[Reformism#Right-Reformism|Reforms]] -
* Non Violent Revolution - Examples being [[File:Cryptan.png]] [[Techno-Anarchism|Crypto-Anarchism]] and [[File:Agorismf.png]] [[Agorism]]. It works together with peacefully spreading Anarcho-Capitalist ideas, partly through the separation of school and state.
* [[File:Inscap.png]] Violent Revolution - Some Anarcho-Capitalist groups and individuals propose the violent overthrow of government and the seizure of the state's assets.
* [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism|Secession]] - [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Hoppeanism|Hoppeans]] argue that the natural order can be achieved through radical political decentralization.
*Some beliefs that markets competitivity along with technology development will eventually make the state obsolete so human progress through markets mechanisms will naturally abolish it.
===Family Institutition===
Line 397 ⟶ 396:
===Marriage===
Libertarianism treats marriage as a form that individual's associate in society, which shouldn't be controlled by the state, and which brings along with it a number of customary rights and duties. This doesn't necessarily go against the more traditional definition of an unbreakable bond, wherein marriage is a spiritual union rather than a legal one.
As such, there is no "[[File:libertarian.png]] [[libertarianism|libertarian]] stance on marriage" in general, as marriage transcends the scope of libertarian philosophy, which is an incomplete legal-political philosophy.
==Foundations and beliefs==
One of the fundamental beliefs that Anarcho-Capitalists hold is that the existence of the [[File:sec.png]] [[authoritarianism|state]], defined as a [[File:corp.png]] [[corporatocracy|monopoly]] of protection and law-enforcement over a given territory, must lead to a more inefficient management of scarce resources, and a necessarily more violent and less productive system compared to one based on private property, even at producing security. They also make a praxeological argument in favor of the abolition of taxation (and consequently, the state), saying that any form of [[File:Illeg.png]] [[Illegalism|theft]] decreases stock of present goods of the individuals affected, thus increasing their time-preference (preference for present over future goods), but taxation, being constant and not considered theft by a majority of the population, not only increases time-preferences but changes its pattern (also decreasing, at an unknown rate, the future stock of goods), making people less forward-thinking, making investment less rewarding and slowing or even reversing the civilization effect that a lower social time-preferece rate causes.<ref name="Dem">[https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy: The God that Failed] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe</ref>
Those could be considered the more economistic arguments against the state that Anarcho-Capitalists make, but most also make an juridical critique of the state. With regards to legal philosophy, Anarcho-Capitalists argue that all use of force, when not employed in self-defence, is justified ground for retaliation from the victim. They define coercion as any initiation force, or threat thereof, over another individual's property (which includes their body).<br>The idea that there is a natural right to own oneself and appropriate the natural resources one employs before anyone else (one's private property), for Rothbard, stems from the fact that it's impossible to establish universal ethical norms if one is to deny this fact; if the notion of [[File:Autarch.png]] [[Autarchy|self-ownership]] and [[File:
Because of this foundational philosophical view (which is deduced differently though almost universally agreed for, besides consequentialist Anarcho-Capitalists), Anarcho-Capitalists necessarily view taxation as theft, and any form of theft as illegitimate. And they belive the same for any violent regulation on individuals' behavior or control over their property which doesn't result from a contractually-binding, voluntary relationship.<br>
In fact, because they don't see majority rule as a legitimate form of electing representatives (since voluntary contracts must be unanimous), anarcho-capitalists argue against [[File:Dem.png]][[democracy]], viewing subjection through democracy as no better than subjection through any other kind of government, some even arguing for [[File:monarch.png]] [[monarchism]] as a preferable system.<ref name="Dem"></ref><ref>[https://cdn.mises.org/From%20Aristocracy%20to%20Monarchy%20to%20Democracy_Hoppe_Text%202014.pdf From Aristocracy, To Monarchy, To Democracy] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe</ref><br>
|