Corporatism: Difference between revisions

|caption="Workers of the world, produce 40,000 cars this month, and sell them atfor 1,500 dollars."

|aliases={{CollapseScrollBox|

[[File:InejiroAsanuma.png]] [[Monarcho-Socialism|Inejiro Asanuma Thought]] ([[File:SocialistCorporatism.png]] Socialist Corporatism)<br>

[[File:NaziNeosoc.png]] [[NazismNeosocialism]] ([[File:SocialistCorporatism.png]] Socialist Corporatism)<br>

[[File:Nordmodel.png]] [[Nordic Model]] ([[File:Soccorp.png]] Social Corporatism)<br>

[[File:SlovakFashBall.png]] [[Clerical Fascism|Tisoism]]<br>

[[File:SocialistCorporatism.png]] '''Socialist Corporatism'''/Socialized Economy {{Collapse|

'''Liberal corporatism''' is a liberal version of corporatism that recognizes the bargaining interests of multiple groups within society, such as in the business, labor, and agricultural sectors and licenses them to engage in bargaining over economic policies with the state. This form of corporatism doesn't oppose individualism like a lot of forms of corporatism, which is where the political liberalism comes from, and is an influential component of the [[File:NatprogPrognat.png]] progressive movement in the United States since the late 19th century, being referred to as "interest group liberalism". Liberal corporatism is commonly supported by proponents in Austria, Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.

'''Social Corporatism''' is a form of economic tripartite corporatism based upon a social partnership between the interests of capital and labor, involving collective bargaining between representatives of employers and of labor mediated by the government at the national level. It is considered a compromise to regulate the conflict between capital and labor by mandating them to engage in mutual consultations that are mediated by the government. Social Corporatism often uses State Owned Enterprises for many goods such as alcohol and public utilities like energy, railways and water while allowing private control over most other industries and consumer goods. Historically they have clashed with the more socialist wings of social-democratic parties as they support negotiations between workers and owners as well as keeping industry in the hands of capitalists while making them obey the unions and sectoral bargaining rules. This sets them apart from the more radical [[File:Demsocstar.png]] [[Democratic Socialism|socialists]] who support nationalisation of industry, sometimes without even compensating the capitalists, and workplace democracy while also setting them apart from the more [[File:3way.png]] [[Third Way|neoliberal]] elements too as they oppose tax cuts, deregulation and often free trade which undermines trade union strength. There have also been controversies in countries like Sweden recently over many Social Corporatists taking anti-immigrant lines due to companies hiring cheap Polish or Thai workers unoffically in order to dodge sectoral bargaining laws.