Talk:Climate Skepticism: Difference between revisions
From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
FanOfWolves (talk | contribs) (can other people actually used the discussion pages) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
How can something deny and advocate for Climate Change at the same time lmao |
How can something deny and advocate for Climate Change at the same time lmao |
||
User:FanOfWolves: Climate Skepticism thinks that, when it, for example, destroys forests or uses fossil fuels, it doesn't matter and won't have a major effect on the world. Without the "DeStrOyiNG nAtUrE" gimmick, CS would have no personality. |
|||
== Should this be the New Portrait? == |
== Should this be the New Portrait? == |
||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
*[[File:Rojtleft.png]] [[User:Rojtavs|Rojtavs]] - Yes, but only remove the background to looking very good |
*[[File:Rojtleft.png]] [[User:Rojtavs|Rojtavs]] - Yes, but only remove the background to looking very good |
||
FanOfWolves-Yes it should (I already made it the portrait lol) |
|||
Latest revision as of 03:09, 15 May 2024
How can something deny and advocate for Climate Change at the same time lmao
User:FanOfWolves: Climate Skepticism thinks that, when it, for example, destroys forests or uses fossil fuels, it doesn't matter and won't have a major effect on the world. Without the "DeStrOyiNG nAtUrE" gimmick, CS would have no personality.
Should this be the New Portrait?
Rojtavs - Yes, but only remove the background to looking very good
FanOfWolves-Yes it should (I already made it the portrait lol)
