Talk:Islamic Populism: Difference between revisions
Fsclander256 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
Abrokendoor literally said that [[File:Anego.png]][[File:Annil.png]][[File:Anpostleft.png]][[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]][[File:Post-an.png]][[File:Insarch.png]][[File:Illeg.png]][[File:Soul.png]][[File:Prim.png]][[File:Anprim.png]] 'There's no "permission"' [[File:Avar.png]], I was not quite aware that Abrokendoor was an avaritionist but I think this solves pretty much every reason why he's doing any of this in the first place lol |
Abrokendoor literally said that [[File:Anego.png]][[File:Annil.png]][[File:Anpostleft.png]][[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]][[File:Post-an.png]][[File:Insarch.png]][[File:Illeg.png]][[File:Soul.png]][[File:Prim.png]][[File:Anprim.png]] 'There's no "permission"' [[File:Avar.png]], I was not quite aware that Abrokendoor was an avaritionist but I think this solves pretty much every reason why he's doing any of this in the first place lol |
||
P.S. It seems that... ADMIN IS DEAD, AND WE HAVE KILLED HIM! <big>'''LONG LIVE ANARCHY!!!!!'''</big> /s |
Revision as of 09:39, 28 June 2024
Can you fucking stop Abrokendoor
Abrokendoor stop fucking editing, the houthis are not social justice advocates, have you seen how they treat women and LGBT people?!
The wiki itself explains what Social Justice is, it has less to do with social progressivism and more with economic progressivism. Conservatives, like the Houthis, can advocate for social justice just like John Paul II did.
Also more proof that Houthis aren't social justice advocates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houthi_movement#Abuse_of_women_and_girls
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houthi_movement#Abuse_of_LGBTI_people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houthi_movement#Abuse_of_migrants
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houthi_movement#Persecution_of_the_Yemenite_Jewish_community
I don't know what the correlation is, social conservatives can advocate for social justice
Ah yes, Abuse = social conservatism. Congratulations, you just successfully framed yourself as an unironic totalitarian
User:FanOfWolves -These cases of abuse are motivated BY social conservativism.
Your proof is just a bunch of unrelated stuff, I literally had no idea how that "proves" anything
You have nothing to prove either
Stop edit warring, abrokendoor
Literaly edited with my argument in there, then three middle schoolers came in just to be wrong about it, how embarrassing
Is anyone on discord? Someone should really call admins to ban terrorist supporters (no name specified)
ban abrokendoor pls
ban FanOfWolves and DarkEggChocolateBowser pls
- Why should I be banned? you're the person who started it + you added false info with 0 reasoning other than your bullshit opinion no one cares about + the other khomenoid got consequences so you should be banned on this wiki too
- Which "consequences" did I get, buddy? You should be banned for removing truthful information for biased reasons and vandalism
Lmao he literally said "the other khomenoid got "consequences"", you shouldn't be saying this at all if you aren't khomeinism alt account
- That's quite the allegation, my account was created way before than his, his style of writing is nothing similar to mine. I think that dude is Iranian too
Ban abrokendoor mods
- Mods should decide if the Houthi movement advocates for Social Justice, not you three
bro thinks hes the mod
- Stop edit warring, abrokendoor.
User:FanOfWolves - Abrokendoor, by your own argument, you should just concede and let a mod decide.
- DECB accuses me of edit warring, I revert it back to how it was before the edit war and dude starts edit warring, hilarious
Solution
okay guys we can make new icons for islamic and christian social justice and place them under the theocracy pages under the belief section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice#Religious_perspectives
- Or let the Houthi movement have Social Justice like the Muslim Brotherhood or John Paul II, it shouldn't change just because some fucking idiot thinks otherwise
- I tried to make a compromise on the Khomeinism page, it's your decision whether to continue the war or not. I somewhat get why the MB would have "Social Justice", but the Houthis having social justice doesn't make any sense.
- You're clearly completely ignorant, really not sure if you're in middle school yet after that.
- Do you accept my compromise on the Khomeinism page? Don't deflect an answer. You have a chance to end the war right here by accepting it, and it's your fault if this continues.
- (Self-proclaimed) is used for when someone straight out bullshits. (Debatably) is better in my opinion.
- I somewhat disagree with you, as the Iranian revolution wasn't ran by Khomeinists, the revolution only succeeded because of left-wing militants. I will add back the "Self-proclaimed, debatable" since it's accurate and lenient.
- "the revolution only succeeded because of left-wing militants" what a claim, I think you're completely ignorant. Also Social Justice still is predominant among Khomeinists.
kami- I think decb is an artist so he could make an Islamic and Christian social justice icons. solves the problem and shows the difference between modern progressive social justice and religious social justice
Philosophical debates on ongoing edit war arguments
Abrokendoor literally said that 'There's no "permission"'
, I was not quite aware that Abrokendoor was an avaritionist but I think this solves pretty much every reason why he's doing any of this in the first place lol
P.S. It seems that... ADMIN IS DEAD, AND WE HAVE KILLED HIM! LONG LIVE ANARCHY!!!!! /s