Talk:Right-Wing Populism

Welcome to Right-Wing Populism's talk page!

This is the talk page for Right-Wing Populism. Everyone must follow these rules to keep those pages in order.

• Read the Wiki Guidelines and Wikia's Terms of Service before you interact with the wiki and the talk pages.
• Stay on topic. This page is about Right-Wing Populism. Never go off-topic.
• Talk pages are for discussion, not for joking and shitposting.
• In your topic, provide your Wikia signature and the full date before your message. This can be done by typing ~~~~.
• Do not reply to topics that have ended or haven't had a response in a while, also known as gravedigging.

Topics that break any of those rules will be removed and repeated offenses will result in punishment.

PIS wasn't Nationalist for ages.

Trumpism and Wikipedia

Wikipedia is known to have a left-leaning bias and even a far-left stance on Donald Trump. I do not think Wikipedia is a place for unbiased facts about Trump, just look at their page for Trumpism. They portray Trumpism as a neo-fascist, xenophobic and violent ideology (in reality it is only a small faction), while siting sources with left-leaning biases. - User:TheExtinctAnimals

• Notice how how you don't provide a single actually existing example of anything you just said. And no, simply stating that what somebody else is wrong does not constitute a legitimate refutation. If you want to refute anything on this page, then explain the specific problems with the specific sources cited (rather than levy vague accusations of bias), and then provide your own sources to counter them. - Rigourdigga
  • I am no expert on the subject of Trump nor American politics, and I am not here to attempt to remove anything from the Trumpism section. I just wanted to say that by looking at the page “Trumpism” and “Talk:Trumpism” on Wikipedia, you can see a clear bias while citing left-leaning sources for citations. Quote “Trumpism is a political movement in the United States that comprises the political ideologies associated with Donald Trump and his political base.[7][8] It incorporates ideologies such as right-wing populism, national conservatism, and neo-nationalism, and has been described as authoritarian[a] and neo-fascist.[b] Trumpist rhetoric heavily features anti-immigrant,[43] xenophobic,[44] nativist,[45] and racist attacks against minority groups.” I just don’t want anyone to, for example, add “Neo-Fascism”, “Racism”, “Xenophobia” or any other extremist ideologies to the Trumpism section just because Wikipedia said so. But if you insist on doing that or similar, I won’t stand in your way, this is too much for me to care about. I’ll be leaving the discussion here, I apologize for any inconveniences. - User:TheExtinctAnimals

Moving the Confederation Liberty and Independence

I will be moving the Confederation variant to Reactionary Liberalism. My reasoning for this is due to the party's ultraconservative political positions combined with its radical support of economic liberalism. FanOfWolves (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Too many variants

This page may have a similar problem as the White Nationalism page: Too much variants. I know this (somewhat) may be my fault due the variants that I kept adding, but I added those variants to the page based opon the information that I had about them.

For example, someone may think that the Popular Greek Patriotic Union party may be to radical for this page, but I think the party fits in here perfectly due to its anti-immigrant rhetoric. This argument can be used for many of the variants that added it moved to the page (such as Baudet)

One variant that I have been thinking of moving is the Voice Of Reason variant. I would probably move it to Reactionary Liberalism due to Latinopoulou's ultraconservative political positions combines with support for fiscally conservative policies such as tax cuts. The Popular Renewal party could be moved using the same exact argument.

I know that one may argue that having too much variants is better than having little-to no variants, but in my opinion, the variants section on this page is too stuffed. I could probably move some of the variants on the personal variants section to the Regional Variants section to maybe make the sizes of the two sections equal, but some of these variants would actually fit more in another page.

- FanOfWolves (talk) 22:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Yeah I see frequent moves between this, nat con and react lib, as well as natlib -kamilazer

I've decided to move the Popular Renewal variant to Reactionary Liberalism. This is not the only variant that I am going to move, as me only moving this one would have no affect on this pages inflated size. - FanOfWolves (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, quite a few of these could go in Ultranationalism (Sosocaism, Toroczkaism etc). Especially since Sosocaism is more radical than AUR in a Romanian context etc. -Davhen07