m
no edit summary
m (Changed link destination to the Democratic_Socialism page, from Accelerationism for a Matt C under notable people.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 85:
[[File:Music.png]] Music <br>
[[File:Contrarianism-Icon.png]] Counterculture <br>
|dislikes = [[File:CapRealism.png]] [[mh:philosophyball:Capitalist Realism|Capitalist Realism]]<br>
[[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism]]<br>
}}
Line 93:
Acid Communism is extremely existentialist, with beliefs such as the idea that the future is cancelled, because every idea of the future has been thought of and realized in past interpretations of such future, like in sci-fi movies and novels.
==History==
Acid Communism, as proposed by Mark Fisher, has origins in [[File:Poststruct.png]]
==Beliefs And Philosophy==
===[[File:PostMarxism.png]]Capitalist Realism[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]===
In ''Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative'' Mark Fisher articulates and goes into detail about the famous quote from [[File:Žižekism.png]] [[Neo-Marxism|Žižek]] - "It is easier to imagine the end of the world then the end of capitalism." Fisher shows that this is due to our new [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]
===[[File:Poststruct.png]]Hauntology And Lost Futures[[File:DepressionMale.png]]===
In ''Ghosts Of My Life'' Fisher continues the logic of [[File:Poststruct.png]]
===[[File:Acidcomf.png]]Anti-Control Politics And Acid Communism[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]===
Line 154:
*[[File:Kak.png]] [[Kakistocracy]] - What is Twitter if not a libidinal economy? And I critiqued call-out culture before it was cool. <s>But please stop making fun of me for being a "boring book nerd"</s>
*[[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism]] - You won't really get past [[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism|him]], even if you pretend you think the end of capitalism is easy to imagine.
*[[File:Postmodernicon.png]]
* [[File:Accel.png]] [[Accelerationism]] - Contradictions never killed anyone, Marx... And [[File:Landian Accelerationism.png]] Land, we had fun didn't we?
*[[File:Awaj.png]] [[Anarchism]] - Your opposition to authoritarianism is commendable, but your theory is too rigid, arbitrary, and naive.
|