Content deleted Content added
Rigourdigga (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[File:Anreactlib.png]] Anarcho-Reactionary Liberalism<br> |
[[File:Anreactlib.png]] Anarcho-Reactionary Liberalism<br> |
||
[[File:ORA.png]] Paleolibertarian Anarcho-Capitalism<br> |
[[File:ORA.png]] Paleolibertarian Anarcho-Capitalism<br> |
||
[[File: |
[[File:Anpaleobert.png]] Anarcho-Paleolibertarianism<br> |
||
[[File:AnNatcap.png]] Anarcho-National Capitalism<br> |
|||
[[File:Annatbert.png]] Anarcho-National Libertarianism<br> |
[[File:Annatbert.png]] Anarcho-National Libertarianism<br> |
||
[[File:Anbertmon.png]] Anarcho-Libertarian Monarchism<br> |
[[File:Anbertmon.png]] Anarcho-Libertarian Monarchism<br> |
||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
[[File:Kant.png]] Kantian Libertarianism<br> |
[[File:Kant.png]] Kantian Libertarianism<br> |
||
Right Post-Statism<br> |
Right Post-Statism<br> |
||
[[File:Natural Order.png]] Ordonaturalism<ref>https://www.hoppean.org/article/ordonaturalism-as-the-opposite-of-anarcho-tyranny-a-new-conceptual-framework-for-the-right-libertarian</ref><br> Anti Democratic Ochlocracy<br> |
[[File:Natural Order.png]] Ordonaturalism<ref>[https://www.hoppean.org/article/ordonaturalism-as-the-opposite-of-anarcho-tyranny-a-new-conceptual-framework-for-the-right-libertarian Ordonaturalism as the Opposite of Anarcho-Tyranny: A New Conceptual Framework for the Right Libertarian]</ref><br> Anti Democratic Ochlocracy<br> |
||
[[File:AncapGamer.png]] Gamer AnCap<br> |
[[File:AncapGamer.png]] Gamer AnCap<br> |
||
Edgy Ancap<br> |
Edgy Ancap<br> |
||
Line 52: | Line 53: | ||
*[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] (1949-) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] {{PBW|West Germany}} / [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
*[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] (1949-) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] {{PBW|West Germany}} / [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
||
*[[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Stephan Kinsella]] (1965-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
*[[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Stephan Kinsella]] (1965-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
||
*[[File:Kogos.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism|Paulo Kogos]] (1986-) [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] {{PBW|Brazilball|Brazil}} |
|||
*[[File:AltBert.png]] [[Alt-Right|Christopher "Chase" Rachels]] (1989-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
*[[File:AltBert.png]] [[Alt-Right|Christopher "Chase" Rachels]] (1989-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
||
*[[File:TaleedJBrown.png]] [[Anarcho-Fascism|Taleed Brown]] (?-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
*[[File:TaleedJBrown.png]] [[Anarcho-Fascism|Taleed Brown]] (?-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
[[File:Anti-Reform.png]] Anti-Reformism<br> |
[[File:Anti-Reform.png]] Anti-Reformism<br> |
||
[[File:Antisoc.png]] Anti-Socialism<br> |
[[File:Antisoc.png]] Anti-Socialism<br> |
||
[[File:Antizion.png]] Anti-Zionism<ref>[https://mises.org/mises-wire/open-letter-walter-e-block An Open Letter to Walter E. Block]</ref><br> |
|||
[[File:Arist.png]] [[Aristocracy]]<br> |
[[File:Arist.png]] [[Aristocracy]]<br> |
||
[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]]<br> |
[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]]<br> |
||
Line 105: | Line 106: | ||
[[File:Frankfurt.png]] [[Frankfurt School]]<br> |
[[File:Frankfurt.png]] [[Frankfurt School]]<br> |
||
[[File:Kant.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Kantian Philosophy]]<br> |
[[File:Kant.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Kantian Philosophy]]<br> |
||
[[File:Natcap.png]] [[National Capitalism]]<ref>[https://archive.org/details/fromnationtohousehold From Nation to Household]<br> |
|||
Selected quotation: "The answer is a program of nationalist capitalism, or capitalistic nationalism. Like Francis' national socialism, the national capitalist program has an economic and a cultural component. The similarities of both programs lie in their cultural components. Both are proponents of cultural conservatism and traditional family-centered morality; both are decidedly Western and propose that America was - and should be - a white European Christian male dominated civilization, and hence both oppose all multi-counter-cultural-egalitarian measures and policies. Both programs differ fundamentally, however, regarding the economic policies which they would combine with this cultural conservatism. National socialism would combine its cultural conservatism with the economic politics of the left. But as was explained, these two programmatic elements are incompatible and cannot be successfully combined. In distinct contrast, national capitalism hies to combine cultural conservatism with traditional American laissez-faire capitalism as proposed by old-fashioned 'Austrian' school economists from Bob-Bawerk to Mises and Rothbard - the mortal enemies of the socialists of all stripes from Marx on up to his present social-democratic-liberal-neoconservative followers. In so doing, the national capitalist program has from the outset the distinctive advantage of combining what can - and indeed must - be combined if one wishes to reach one's set goal."</ref><br> |
|||
[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]]<br> |
[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]]<br> |
||
[[File:AntiAntiAbortion.png]] Pro-Choice<br> |
[[File:AntiAntiAbortion.png]] Pro-Choice<br> |
||
Line 127: | Line 130: | ||
|speaker=[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
|speaker=[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Hoppeanism''', sometimes also referred to as '''Conservative Anarcho-Capitalism''', is a [[File:Trad.png]] [[Traditionalism|Culturally right-wing]] tendency within [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]] which puts emphasis on the importance of exclusionary behaviour (ostracism), communitarianism, social conservatism (and its compatibility and complementation with libertarianism), and the opposition to [[File:Dem.png]] [[Democracy]] if one is to maintain the continuous existence of the [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|libertarian]] social order.<ref>[https://archive.org/ |
'''Hoppeanism''', sometimes also referred to as '''Conservative Anarcho-Capitalism''', is a [[File:Trad.png]] [[Traditionalism|Culturally right-wing]] tendency within [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]] which puts emphasis on the importance of exclusionary behaviour (ostracism), communitarianism, social conservatism (and its compatibility and complementation with libertarianism), and the opposition to [[File:Dem.png]] [[Democracy]] if one is to maintain the continuous existence of the [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|libertarian]] social order.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], chapters 1, 3, 9, and 10</ref> |
||
Despite being named after the German economist Hans-Hermann Hoppe, the ideology itself can be tracked back before Hoppe, to the founder of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], Murray Rothbard, as well as Lew Rockwell, in the form of the [[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism|Paleolibertarian movement]] (although generally distinguished from the wider movement by being fundamentally Anarcho-Capitalist, instead of just generally). Hoppe having done some particular contributions, although these were generally also recognized by Rothbard, making it sort of redundant to call Hoppeanism an ideology of its own due to the fact that it overlaps with Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism almost entirely. The ideology is prominent within and associated with the think tank Mises Institute (as such it's represented by it's symbol). |
Despite being named after the German economist Hans-Hermann Hoppe, the ideology itself can be tracked back before Hoppe, to the founder of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], Murray Rothbard, as well as Lew Rockwell, in the form of the [[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism|Paleolibertarian movement]] (although generally distinguished from the wider movement by being fundamentally Anarcho-Capitalist, instead of just generally). Hoppe having done some particular contributions, although these were generally also recognized by Rothbard, making it sort of redundant to call Hoppeanism an ideology of its own due to the fact that it overlaps with Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism almost entirely. The ideology is prominent within and associated with the think tank Mises Institute (as such it's represented by it's symbol). |
||
Due to memes regarding the helicopters the ideology is associated with [[File:Pinochet.png]] [[Pinochetism]], although it is important to note that, despite this meme being quite popular within political communities, Hoppe, and most thinkers associated, do not actually favour throwing [[File:Commie.png]] [[Marxism#Communism|communists]] and [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|socialists]] out of helicopters, merely favouring ostracism and exclusion from the property of the residents of certain "covenant community" (as he calls private communities).<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt0TWTVyY9Q Hoppe speaks on Physical Removal - no helicopters, sorry]</ref>. He also opposes NATO, which supported Pinochet. |
Due to memes regarding the helicopters the ideology is associated with [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] [[Pinochetism]], although it is important to note that, despite this meme being quite popular within political communities, Hoppe, and most thinkers associated, do not actually favour throwing [[File:Commie.png]] [[Marxism#Communism|communists]] and [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|socialists]] out of helicopters, merely favouring ostracism and exclusion from the property of the residents of certain "covenant community" (as he calls private communities).<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt0TWTVyY9Q Hoppe speaks on Physical Removal - no helicopters, sorry]</ref>. He also opposes NATO, which supported Pinochet. |
||
==Beliefs== |
==Beliefs== |
||
Line 138: | Line 141: | ||
One of the inputs which Hoppe made to Anarcho-Capitalism, although also recognized by [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Anarcho-Capitalism's]] creator, Murray Rothbard, as "a dazzling breakthrough for political philosophy in general and for libertarianism in particular"<ref>Symposium (November 1988). [http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/files/printarchive/Liberty_Magazine_November_1988.pdf "Hans-Hermannn Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics: Breakthrough or Buncombe?"] (PDF). Liberty. 2 (2): 44–54.</ref> is argumentation ethics, which could, in short, be defined as proof provided by Hoppe for the ethics of right-libertarian conception of property rights developed in 1988. It aims to prove that arguing against the right-libertarian interpretation of self-ownership (which extends the concept to include control of private property as part of the self<ref>[https://mises.org/sites/default/files/economics_and_ethics_of_private_property_2020.pdf "The Economics and Ethics of Private Property"] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 1993</ref>) is contradictory and thus not logically coherent. Although this, at first, could sound like something that would come to be a widely popular theory within [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarian]] circles, the reception was mixed.<ref>Kinsella, Stephan (March 13, 2009). [http://archive.mises.org/9610/revisiting-argumentation-ethics/ "Revisiting Argumentation Ethics".] Mises Economics Blog. Ludwig von Mises Institute.</ref> |
One of the inputs which Hoppe made to Anarcho-Capitalism, although also recognized by [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Anarcho-Capitalism's]] creator, Murray Rothbard, as "a dazzling breakthrough for political philosophy in general and for libertarianism in particular"<ref>Symposium (November 1988). [http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/files/printarchive/Liberty_Magazine_November_1988.pdf "Hans-Hermannn Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics: Breakthrough or Buncombe?"] (PDF). Liberty. 2 (2): 44–54.</ref> is argumentation ethics, which could, in short, be defined as proof provided by Hoppe for the ethics of right-libertarian conception of property rights developed in 1988. It aims to prove that arguing against the right-libertarian interpretation of self-ownership (which extends the concept to include control of private property as part of the self<ref>[https://mises.org/sites/default/files/economics_and_ethics_of_private_property_2020.pdf "The Economics and Ethics of Private Property"] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 1993</ref>) is contradictory and thus not logically coherent. Although this, at first, could sound like something that would come to be a widely popular theory within [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarian]] circles, the reception was mixed.<ref>Kinsella, Stephan (March 13, 2009). [http://archive.mises.org/9610/revisiting-argumentation-ethics/ "Revisiting Argumentation Ethics".] Mises Economics Blog. Ludwig von Mises Institute.</ref> |
||
To explain it briefly, Hoppe takes note that, to have an argument, one must |
To explain it briefly, Hoppe takes note that, to have an argument, one must presuppose self-ownership and thus certain norms, such as, and being the main one, non-violence among the participants, and that one must be able to act; these norms were named the "a priori of argumentation" (APoA) by Hoppe.<br> Hoppe then says that, to argue against [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], which he argues is the most pure expression of self-ownership, is to argue against self-ownership itself, thus one's proposition must be denying the fundamental presupposed propositions of argumentation, while in the course of argumentation, denying their own self-ownership. Thus, if one argues against self-ownership, then they're involved in a performative contradiction which empties the argument of its meaning, since argumentation also presupposes the law of non-contradiction.<ref>[http://www.hanshoppe.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/hoppe_ult_just_liberty.pdf "The Ultimate Justification of Private Property" (PDF).] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (September 1988).</ref> |
||
===Private Law Society=== |
===Private Law Society=== |
||
Line 213: | Line 216: | ||
*[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]] - Dearest father. |
*[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]] - Dearest father. |
||
*[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]] - The superior economic school of thought. Mises was certainly the greatest economist of all time. |
*[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]] - The superior economic school of thought. Mises was certainly the greatest economist of all time. |
||
*[[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]] [[Korwinism |
*[[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]] [[Korwinism]] - We have a shared appreciation for liberty, property and tradition. |
||
*[[File:Agorismf.png]] [[Agorism]] - Counter economics is admirable. We must stop the left from acquiring further power and disobedience of the state is very much a practice to be promoted and celebrated. |
*[[File:Agorismf.png]] [[Agorism]] - Counter economics is admirable. We must stop the left from acquiring further power and disobedience of the state is very much a practice to be promoted and celebrated. |
||
*[[File:Anmona.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism]] - Monarchy is much better at keeping the growth of the state in check, and we don't need a state to have a king! |
*[[File:Anmona.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism]] - Monarchy is much better at keeping the growth of the state in check, and we don't need a state to have a king! |
||
Line 226: | Line 229: | ||
*[[File:LiberMon.png]] [[Libertarian Monarchism]] - Europe of a thousand Liechtensteins! |
*[[File:LiberMon.png]] [[Libertarian Monarchism]] - Europe of a thousand Liechtensteins! |
||
*[[File:Confed.png]] [[Confederalism]], [[File:Urb.png]] [[Patchwork]] & [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism]] - "''Don't put your trust in democracy, but neither should you put trust in a dictatorship. Rather, put into radical political decentralization''" |
*[[File:Confed.png]] [[Confederalism]], [[File:Urb.png]] [[Patchwork]] & [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism]] - "''Don't put your trust in democracy, but neither should you put trust in a dictatorship. Rather, put into radical political decentralization''" |
||
*[[File:Anpacf.png]] [[Anarcho-Pacifism]] - "''To the contrary, it is only necessary that one decide to withdraw from the compulsory union and reassume one's right to self protection. Indeed, it is essential that one proceed in no other way than by peaceful secession and noncooperation.''"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], |
*[[File:Anpacf.png]] [[Anarcho-Pacifism]] - "''To the contrary, it is only necessary that one decide to withdraw from the compulsory union and reassume one's right to self protection. Indeed, it is essential that one proceed in no other way than by peaceful secession and noncooperation.''"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], chapter 3</ref> |
||
*[[File:Seibt.png]] [[Alt-Lite#Seibtism|Seibtism]] - You're a beauty good girl. |
*[[File:Seibt.png]] [[Alt-Lite#Seibtism|Seibtism]] - You're a beauty good girl. |
||
Line 233: | Line 236: | ||
*[[File:Feud.png]] [[Feudalism]] / [[Aristocracy]] [[File:Arist.png]] - You did come close to the natural order, just stop it with the serfdom part. |
*[[File:Feud.png]] [[Feudalism]] / [[Aristocracy]] [[File:Arist.png]] - You did come close to the natural order, just stop it with the serfdom part. |
||
*[[File:Abmon.png]] [[Absolute Monarchism]] - You're infinitely better than democracy and infinitely worse than anarchy. |
*[[File:Abmon.png]] [[Absolute Monarchism]] - You're infinitely better than democracy and infinitely worse than anarchy. |
||
*[[File:Altr.png]] [[Alt-Right]] - Your ideology appeals way too much to mysticism over rationality, you obsess too much over the racial collective instead of the innate differences of individuals, you're also too much willing to make concessions to socialism as long it puts whites as beneficiaries, which it won't.<ref>Introduction to [https://mises.org/wire/getting-libertarianism-right Getting Libertarianism Right], Sean Gabb</ref> Nonetheless I appreciate that your representatives are willing to get familiar with the works of Rothbard,<ref>[https://mises.org/wire/getting-libertarianism-right Getting Libertarianism Right], chapter 3 |
*[[File:Altr.png]] [[Alt-Right]] - Your ideology appeals way too much to mysticism over rationality, you obsess too much over the racial collective instead of the innate differences of individuals, you're also too much willing to make concessions to socialism as long it puts whites as beneficiaries, which it won't.<ref>Introduction to [https://mises.org/wire/getting-libertarianism-right Getting Libertarianism Right], Sean Gabb</ref> Nonetheless I appreciate that your representatives are willing to get familiar with the works of Rothbard,<ref>[https://mises.org/wire/getting-libertarianism-right Getting Libertarianism Right], chapter 3</ref> and you're welcome to speak at my lectures. I hope I don't have to physically remove you. |
||
*[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]] [[National Capitalism]] - Your hatred of commies and degenerates is admirable, but your love of the state is not. Also, cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks, Mises and Rothbard were both Jewish. |
*[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]] [[National Capitalism]] - Your hatred of commies and degenerates is admirable, but your love of the state is not. Also, cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks, Mises and Rothbard were both Jewish. |
||
*[[File:Kahan.png]] [[Kahanism]] - Same goes for you, the state is not the way. |
*[[File:Kahan.png]] [[Kahanism]] - Same goes for you, the state is not the way. |
||
Line 254: | Line 257: | ||
*[[File:WelfChauvin.png]] [[Welfare Chauvinism]] -"''That is, they subsidize immigration- they force domestic taxpayers to subsidize immigration. In particular, they also subsidize domestic employers who contract foreign cheaper workers''"<ref>[https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/hans-hermann-hoppe/immigration-and-libertarianism/ Immigration and Libertarianism] </ref> |
*[[File:WelfChauvin.png]] [[Welfare Chauvinism]] -"''That is, they subsidize immigration- they force domestic taxpayers to subsidize immigration. In particular, they also subsidize domestic employers who contract foreign cheaper workers''"<ref>[https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/hans-hermann-hoppe/immigration-and-libertarianism/ Immigration and Libertarianism] </ref> |
||
*[[File:LeftCom.png]] [[Italian Left Communism]] -"We Both Dislike Democracy and Anti-Fascism" |
*[[File:LeftCom.png]] [[Italian Left Communism]] -"We Both Dislike Democracy and Anti-Fascism" |
||
*[[File:Bckchn.png]] [[Libertarian Municipalism]] - Leftist that likes ostrakysm too. But his cultural views are kinda cringe and anti-monarchist stances make me yawn. |
|||
===Enemies=== |
===Enemies=== |
||
Line 264: | Line 268: | ||
*[[File:Multicult.png]] [[Multiculturalism]] - There can be peaceful coexistence of different cultures along distant, physically separated territory. But Multiculturalism - cultural heterogeneity - cannot exist in one and the same place without leading to diminishing trust, increased tension and the call for a strongman and ultimately the end of libertarian social order. |
*[[File:Multicult.png]] [[Multiculturalism]] - There can be peaceful coexistence of different cultures along distant, physically separated territory. But Multiculturalism - cultural heterogeneity - cannot exist in one and the same place without leading to diminishing trust, increased tension and the call for a strongman and ultimately the end of libertarian social order. |
||
*[[File:Statlib.png]] [[State Liberalism]] - Authoritarian, progressive AND corporatocratic? You are pure evil. |
*[[File:Statlib.png]] [[State Liberalism]] - Authoritarian, progressive AND corporatocratic? You are pure evil. |
||
*[[File:Block.png]] [[ |
*[[File:Block.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Blockiansm]] - Seriously man? Support Israel and be a Zionist? |
||
*[[File:Necon.png]] [[Neoconservatism]] - Stop attacking, killing and bombing people in foreign countries! |
*[[File:Necon.png]] [[Neoconservatism]] - Stop attacking, killing and bombing people in foreign countries! |
||
*[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] - Same with you! |
*[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] - Same with you! |
||
Line 363: | Line 367: | ||
{{Navbox/Monarchists}} |
{{Navbox/Monarchists}} |
||
{{Navbox/Reactionaries}} |
{{Navbox/Reactionaries}} |
||
{{Navbox/Conservatives}} |
|||
{{Navbox/Libertarians}} |
{{Navbox/Libertarians}} |
||
[[Category:Culturally Right]] |
[[Category:Culturally Right]] |
||
[[Category:Male Characters]] |
[[Category:Male Characters]] |