Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(19 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] Hoppean Libertarianism<br> |
[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] Hoppean Libertarianism<br> |
||
[[File:Mises.png]][[File:Murray N Rothbard.png]][[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] Misesianism-Rothbardianism-Hoppeanism<br> |
[[File:Mises.png]][[File:Murray N Rothbard.png]][[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] Misesianism-Rothbardianism-Hoppeanism<br> |
||
[[File:Discrimbert.png]] Pro-discrimination Libertarianism<ref>[https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], |
[[File:Discrimbert.png]] Pro-discrimination Libertarianism<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], chapter 10, page 219 - "Libertarians, in their attempt to establish a free natural social order, must strive to regain from the state the right to exclusion inherent in private property. Yet even before they accomplish this and in order to render such an achievement even possible, libertarians cannot soon enough begin to reassert and exercise, to the extent that the situation still permits them to do so, their right to exclusion in everyday life. Libertarians must distinguish themselves from others by practicing (as well as advocating) the most extreme form of intolerance and discrimination against egalitarians, democrats, socialists, communists, multiculturalists, environmentalists, ill manners, misconduct, incompetence, rudeness, vulgarity, and obscenity. Like true conservatives, who will have to dissociate themselves from the false social(ist) conservatism of the Buchananites and the neoconservatives, true libertarians must visibly and ostentatiously dissociate themselves from the false multicountercultural and anti-authoritarian egalitarian left-libertarian impostors."</ref><br> |
||
[[File:Ultraconancap.png]] Ultraconservative Anarcho-Capitalism<br> |
[[File:Ultraconancap.png]] Ultraconservative Anarcho-Capitalism<br> |
||
[[File:Ultraconancap.png]] Bourgeois Ultraconservative Anarchism<br> |
[[File:Ultraconancap.png]] Bourgeois Ultraconservative Anarchism<br> |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[File:Anreactlib.png]] Anarcho-Reactionary Liberalism<br> |
[[File:Anreactlib.png]] Anarcho-Reactionary Liberalism<br> |
||
[[File:ORA.png]] Paleolibertarian Anarcho-Capitalism<br> |
[[File:ORA.png]] Paleolibertarian Anarcho-Capitalism<br> |
||
[[File: |
[[File:Anpaleobert.png]] Anarcho-Paleolibertarianism<br> |
||
⚫ | |||
[[File:Annatbert.png]] Anarcho-National Libertarianism<br> |
[[File:Annatbert.png]] Anarcho-National Libertarianism<br> |
||
[[File:Anbertmon.png]] Anarcho-Libertarian Monarchism<br> |
[[File:Anbertmon.png]] Anarcho-Libertarian Monarchism<br> |
||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
[[File:Kant.png]] Kantian Libertarianism<br> |
[[File:Kant.png]] Kantian Libertarianism<br> |
||
Right Post-Statism<br> |
Right Post-Statism<br> |
||
[[File:Natural Order.png]] Ordonaturalism<ref>https://www.hoppean.org/article/ordonaturalism-as-the-opposite-of-anarcho-tyranny-a-new-conceptual-framework-for-the-right-libertarian</ref><br> Anti Democratic Ochlocracy<br> |
[[File:Natural Order.png]] Ordonaturalism<ref>[https://www.hoppean.org/article/ordonaturalism-as-the-opposite-of-anarcho-tyranny-a-new-conceptual-framework-for-the-right-libertarian Ordonaturalism as the Opposite of Anarcho-Tyranny: A New Conceptual Framework for the Right Libertarian]</ref><br> Anti Democratic Ochlocracy<br> |
||
[[File:AncapGamer.png]] Gamer AnCap<br> |
[[File:AncapGamer.png]] Gamer AnCap<br> |
||
Edgy Ancap<br> |
Edgy Ancap<br> |
||
Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
[[File:AltBert.png]] Alt-Right Libertarianism (Debatably)<br> |
[[File:AltBert.png]] Alt-Right Libertarianism (Debatably)<br> |
||
Rightist Bookchinism (Allegedly)<br> |
Rightist Bookchinism (Allegedly)<br> |
||
[[File:Antotcap.png]] Authoritarian Anarcho-Capitalism<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy: The God That Failed], chapter 10, page 218 - "In a covenant concluded among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free (unlimited) speech exists, not even to unlimited speech on one’s own tenant-property. One may say innumerable things and promote almost any idea under the sun, but naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and removed from society. Likewise, in a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance toward those habitually promoting lifestyles incompatible with this goal. They—the advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles such as, for instance, individual hedonism, parasitism, nature-environment worship, homosexuality, or communism—will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain a libertarian order."</ref> (Accused)<br> |
|||
Private Tyranny (by leftists)<br> |
Private Tyranny (by leftists)<br> |
||
Neioghbourhood Watch On Steroids (by Rational Wiki)<br> |
Neioghbourhood Watch On Steroids (by Rational Wiki)<br> |
||
[[File:AnarchoPinochet.png]] Anarcho-Pinochetism (Erroneously)<br> |
[[File:AnarchoPinochet.png]] Anarcho-Pinochetism (Erroneously)<br> |
||
⚫ | |||
Marxism-Leninism Final Boss<br> |
Marxism-Leninism Final Boss<br> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Line 52: | Line 53: | ||
*[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] (1949-) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] {{PBW|West Germany}} / [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
*[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] (1949-) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] {{PBW|West Germany}} / [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
||
*[[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Stephan Kinsella]] (1965-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
*[[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Stephan Kinsella]] (1965-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
||
*[[File:Kogos.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism|Paulo Kogos]] (1986-) [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] {{PBW|Brazilball|Brazil}} |
|||
*[[File:AltBert.png]] [[Alt-Right|Christopher "Chase" Rachels]] (1989-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
*[[File:AltBert.png]] [[Alt-Right|Christopher "Chase" Rachels]] (1989-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
||
*[[File:TaleedJBrown.png]] [[Anarcho-Fascism|Taleed Brown]] (?-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
*[[File:TaleedJBrown.png]] [[Anarcho-Fascism|Taleed Brown]] (?-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}} |
||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
[[File:Anti-Reform.png]] Anti-Reformism<br> |
[[File:Anti-Reform.png]] Anti-Reformism<br> |
||
[[File:Antisoc.png]] Anti-Socialism<br> |
[[File:Antisoc.png]] Anti-Socialism<br> |
||
[[File:Antizion.png]] Anti-Zionism<ref>[https://mises.org/mises-wire/open-letter-walter-e-block An Open Letter to Walter E. Block]</ref><br> |
|||
[[File:Arist.png]] [[Aristocracy]]<br> |
[[File:Arist.png]] [[Aristocracy]]<br> |
||
[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]]<br> |
[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]]<br> |
||
Line 105: | Line 106: | ||
[[File:Frankfurt.png]] [[Frankfurt School]]<br> |
[[File:Frankfurt.png]] [[Frankfurt School]]<br> |
||
[[File:Kant.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Kantian Philosophy]]<br> |
[[File:Kant.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Kantian Philosophy]]<br> |
||
[[File:Natcap.png]] [[National Capitalism]]<ref>[https://archive.org/details/fromnationtohousehold From Nation to Household]<br> |
|||
Selected quotation: "The answer is a program of nationalist capitalism, or capitalistic nationalism. Like Francis' national socialism, the national capitalist program has an economic and a cultural component. The similarities of both programs lie in their cultural components. Both are proponents of cultural conservatism and traditional family-centered morality; both are decidedly Western and propose that America was - and should be - a white European Christian male dominated civilization, and hence both oppose all multi-counter-cultural-egalitarian measures and policies. Both programs differ fundamentally, however, regarding the economic policies which they would combine with this cultural conservatism. National socialism would combine its cultural conservatism with the economic politics of the left. But as was explained, these two programmatic elements are incompatible and cannot be successfully combined. In distinct contrast, national capitalism hies to combine cultural conservatism with traditional American laissez-faire capitalism as proposed by old-fashioned 'Austrian' school economists from Bob-Bawerk to Mises and Rothbard - the mortal enemies of the socialists of all stripes from Marx on up to his present social-democratic-liberal-neoconservative followers. In so doing, the national capitalist program has from the outset the distinctive advantage of combining what can - and indeed must - be combined if one wishes to reach one's set goal."</ref><br> |
|||
[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]]<br> |
[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]]<br> |
||
[[File:AntiAntiAbortion.png]] Pro-Choice<br> |
[[File:AntiAntiAbortion.png]] Pro-Choice<br> |
||
Line 127: | Line 130: | ||
|speaker=[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
|speaker=[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Hoppeanism''', sometimes also referred to as '''Conservative Anarcho-Capitalism''', is a [[File:Trad.png]] [[Traditionalism|Culturally right-wing]] tendency within [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]] which puts emphasis on the importance of exclusionary behaviour (ostracism), communitarianism, social conservatism (and its compatibility and complementation with libertarianism), and the opposition to [[File:Dem.png]] [[Democracy]] if one is to maintain the continuous existence of the [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|libertarian]] social order.<ref>[https://archive.org/ |
'''Hoppeanism''', sometimes also referred to as '''Conservative Anarcho-Capitalism''', is a [[File:Trad.png]] [[Traditionalism|Culturally right-wing]] tendency within [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]] which puts emphasis on the importance of exclusionary behaviour (ostracism), communitarianism, social conservatism (and its compatibility and complementation with libertarianism), and the opposition to [[File:Dem.png]] [[Democracy]] if one is to maintain the continuous existence of the [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|libertarian]] social order.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], chapters 1, 3, 9, and 10</ref> |
||
Despite being named after the German economist Hans-Hermann Hoppe, the ideology itself can be tracked back before Hoppe, to the founder of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], Murray Rothbard, as well as Lew Rockwell, in the form of the [[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism|Paleolibertarian movement]] (although generally distinguished from the wider movement by being fundamentally Anarcho-Capitalist, instead of just generally). Hoppe having done some particular contributions, although these were generally also recognized by Rothbard, making it sort of redundant to call Hoppeanism an ideology of its own due to the fact that it overlaps with Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism almost entirely. The ideology is prominent within and associated with the think tank Mises Institute (as such it's represented by it's symbol). |
Despite being named after the German economist Hans-Hermann Hoppe, the ideology itself can be tracked back before Hoppe, to the founder of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], Murray Rothbard, as well as Lew Rockwell, in the form of the [[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism|Paleolibertarian movement]] (although generally distinguished from the wider movement by being fundamentally Anarcho-Capitalist, instead of just generally). Hoppe having done some particular contributions, although these were generally also recognized by Rothbard, making it sort of redundant to call Hoppeanism an ideology of its own due to the fact that it overlaps with Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism almost entirely. The ideology is prominent within and associated with the think tank Mises Institute (as such it's represented by it's symbol). |
||
Due to memes regarding the helicopters the ideology is associated with [[File:Pinochet.png]] [[Pinochetism]], although it is important to note that, despite this meme being quite popular within political communities, Hoppe, and most thinkers associated, do not actually favour throwing [[File:Commie.png]] [[Marxism#Communism|communists]] and [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|socialists]] out of helicopters, merely favouring ostracism and exclusion from the property of the residents of certain "covenant community" (as he calls private communities).<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt0TWTVyY9Q Hoppe speaks on Physical Removal - no helicopters, sorry]</ref>. He also opposes NATO, which supported Pinochet. |
Due to memes regarding the helicopters the ideology is associated with [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] [[Pinochetism]], although it is important to note that, despite this meme being quite popular within political communities, Hoppe, and most thinkers associated, do not actually favour throwing [[File:Commie.png]] [[Marxism#Communism|communists]] and [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|socialists]] out of helicopters, merely favouring ostracism and exclusion from the property of the residents of certain "covenant community" (as he calls private communities).<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt0TWTVyY9Q Hoppe speaks on Physical Removal - no helicopters, sorry]</ref>. He also opposes NATO, which supported Pinochet. |
||
==Beliefs== |
==Beliefs== |
||
Line 138: | Line 141: | ||
One of the inputs which Hoppe made to Anarcho-Capitalism, although also recognized by [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Anarcho-Capitalism's]] creator, Murray Rothbard, as "a dazzling breakthrough for political philosophy in general and for libertarianism in particular"<ref>Symposium (November 1988). [http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/files/printarchive/Liberty_Magazine_November_1988.pdf "Hans-Hermannn Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics: Breakthrough or Buncombe?"] (PDF). Liberty. 2 (2): 44–54.</ref> is argumentation ethics, which could, in short, be defined as proof provided by Hoppe for the ethics of right-libertarian conception of property rights developed in 1988. It aims to prove that arguing against the right-libertarian interpretation of self-ownership (which extends the concept to include control of private property as part of the self<ref>[https://mises.org/sites/default/files/economics_and_ethics_of_private_property_2020.pdf "The Economics and Ethics of Private Property"] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 1993</ref>) is contradictory and thus not logically coherent. Although this, at first, could sound like something that would come to be a widely popular theory within [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarian]] circles, the reception was mixed.<ref>Kinsella, Stephan (March 13, 2009). [http://archive.mises.org/9610/revisiting-argumentation-ethics/ "Revisiting Argumentation Ethics".] Mises Economics Blog. Ludwig von Mises Institute.</ref> |
One of the inputs which Hoppe made to Anarcho-Capitalism, although also recognized by [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Anarcho-Capitalism's]] creator, Murray Rothbard, as "a dazzling breakthrough for political philosophy in general and for libertarianism in particular"<ref>Symposium (November 1988). [http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/files/printarchive/Liberty_Magazine_November_1988.pdf "Hans-Hermannn Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics: Breakthrough or Buncombe?"] (PDF). Liberty. 2 (2): 44–54.</ref> is argumentation ethics, which could, in short, be defined as proof provided by Hoppe for the ethics of right-libertarian conception of property rights developed in 1988. It aims to prove that arguing against the right-libertarian interpretation of self-ownership (which extends the concept to include control of private property as part of the self<ref>[https://mises.org/sites/default/files/economics_and_ethics_of_private_property_2020.pdf "The Economics and Ethics of Private Property"] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 1993</ref>) is contradictory and thus not logically coherent. Although this, at first, could sound like something that would come to be a widely popular theory within [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarian]] circles, the reception was mixed.<ref>Kinsella, Stephan (March 13, 2009). [http://archive.mises.org/9610/revisiting-argumentation-ethics/ "Revisiting Argumentation Ethics".] Mises Economics Blog. Ludwig von Mises Institute.</ref> |
||
To explain it briefly, Hoppe takes note that, to have an argument, one must |
To explain it briefly, Hoppe takes note that, to have an argument, one must presuppose self-ownership and thus certain norms, such as, and being the main one, non-violence among the participants, and that one must be able to act; these norms were named the "a priori of argumentation" (APoA) by Hoppe.<br> Hoppe then says that, to argue against [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], which he argues is the most pure expression of self-ownership, is to argue against self-ownership itself, thus one's proposition must be denying the fundamental presupposed propositions of argumentation, while in the course of argumentation, denying their own self-ownership. Thus, if one argues against self-ownership, then they're involved in a performative contradiction which empties the argument of its meaning, since argumentation also presupposes the law of non-contradiction.<ref>[http://www.hanshoppe.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/hoppe_ult_just_liberty.pdf "The Ultimate Justification of Private Property" (PDF).] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (September 1988).</ref> |
||
===Private Law Society=== |
===Private Law Society=== |
||
Following the teachings of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Murray Rothbard]], Hoppe uses [[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School|Austrian economic theory]] to analyze the behavior of the state. He defines the state as the "monopoly over jurisdiction and tax collection within a territory" and assumes that it's only the personal interest of the functionaries of the state the reason why they utilize their monopolical privileges to maximize their own power and wealth. |
Following the teachings of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Murray Rothbard]], Hoppe uses [[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School|Austrian economic theory]] to analyze the behavior of the state. He defines the state as the "monopoly over jurisdiction and tax collection within a territory" and assumes that it's only the personal interest of the functionaries of the state the reason why they utilize their monopolical privileges to maximize their own power and wealth. |
||
To Hoppe, and many other [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarians]], especially within the Austrian tradition, a monopoly doesn't imply a big participation on certain market exercised by a corporation, but when there is lack of entrepreneurial freedom to enter certain market and produce certain good or service, as we can currently see with services such as law.<br> Under this perspective, monopolies can't appear, at least by definition, on a completely free market since they're always the result of some state policy which bans the competition on a market or subsidizes competitors within certain markets.<br> Coercive monopolies are detrimental to consumers since prices tend to go up and quality tends to go down to those that could be found on a completely free market. Similarly to Rothbard, Hoppe has conjectured that if the services now provided by the government could be provided by the free market, private insurances and law agencies would provide a better protection and more peaceful disputes resolution than the ones currently under the monopoly of the state.<ref>[https://mises.org/library/idea-private-law-society The Idea of a Private Law Society] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2006).</ref><ref>[https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], ch. 12 "On Government and the Private Production of Defense", by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 2001</ref> |
To Hoppe, and many other [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarians]], especially within the Austrian tradition, a monopoly doesn't imply a big participation on certain market exercised by a corporation, but when there is lack of entrepreneurial freedom to enter certain market and produce certain good or service, as we can currently see with services such as law.<br> Under this perspective, monopolies can't appear, at least by definition, on a completely free market since they're always the result of some state policy which bans the competition on a market or subsidizes competitors within certain markets.<br> Coercive monopolies are detrimental to consumers since prices tend to go up and quality tends to go down to those that could be found on a completely free market. Similarly to Rothbard, Hoppe has conjectured that if the services now provided by the government could be provided by the free market, private insurances and law agencies would provide a better protection and more peaceful disputes resolution than the ones currently under the monopoly of the state.<ref>[https://mises.org/library/idea-private-law-society The Idea of a Private Law Society] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2006).</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], ch. 12 "On Government and the Private Production of Defense", by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 2001</ref> |
||
He has also theorized in favor of secession of [[File:Urb.png]] [[Patchwork|small city-states or microstates]] as being favorable to individual liberty, as a transition towards definitive privatization, which is to say, a society of private law, as Hoppe calls it, or Anarcho-Capitalism. Related to it, he's also said that a [[File:World.png]] [[Globalism|One World Government]] is the logical consequence of the existence of the state, which naturally tends towards centralization and growth, and that being a non-anarchist and also being against centralization is non-consequential (comment directed to [[File:Minarchist.png]] [[Minarchism|minarchists]] and [[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism|classical liberalists]], who are generally favorable to political decentralization, but also of a minimal state).<ref>[https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], ch. 5 "On Centralization and Secession", by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 2001</ref><br> He's also established which would be the criteria of contracts in a society of private right, especially regarding externalities and insurance/indemnities. |
He has also theorized in favor of secession of [[File:Urb.png]] [[Patchwork|small city-states or microstates]] as being favorable to individual liberty, as a transition towards definitive privatization, which is to say, a society of private law, as Hoppe calls it, or Anarcho-Capitalism. Related to it, he's also said that a [[File:World.png]] [[Globalism|One World Government]] is the logical consequence of the existence of the state, which naturally tends towards centralization and growth, and that being a non-anarchist and also being against centralization is non-consequential (comment directed to [[File:Minarchist.png]] [[Minarchism|minarchists]] and [[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism|classical liberalists]], who are generally favorable to political decentralization, but also of a minimal state).<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], ch. 5 "On Centralization and Secession", by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 2001</ref><br> He's also established which would be the criteria of contracts in a society of private right, especially regarding externalities and insurance/indemnities. |
||
===Austrian Class Analysis=== |
===Austrian Class Analysis=== |
||
Line 213: | Line 216: | ||
*[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]] - Dearest father. |
*[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]] - Dearest father. |
||
*[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]] - The superior economic school of thought. Mises was certainly the greatest economist of all time. |
*[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]] - The superior economic school of thought. Mises was certainly the greatest economist of all time. |
||
*[[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]] [[Korwinism |
*[[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]] [[Korwinism]] - We have a shared appreciation for liberty, property and tradition. |
||
*[[File:Agorismf.png]] [[Agorism]] - Counter economics is admirable. We must stop the left from acquiring further power and disobedience of the state is very much a practice to be promoted and celebrated. |
*[[File:Agorismf.png]] [[Agorism]] - Counter economics is admirable. We must stop the left from acquiring further power and disobedience of the state is very much a practice to be promoted and celebrated. |
||
*[[File:Anmona.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism]] - Monarchy is much better at keeping the growth of the state in check, and we don't need a state to have a king! |
*[[File:Anmona.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism]] - Monarchy is much better at keeping the growth of the state in check, and we don't need a state to have a king! |
||
Line 226: | Line 229: | ||
*[[File:LiberMon.png]] [[Libertarian Monarchism]] - Europe of a thousand Liechtensteins! |
*[[File:LiberMon.png]] [[Libertarian Monarchism]] - Europe of a thousand Liechtensteins! |
||
*[[File:Confed.png]] [[Confederalism]], [[File:Urb.png]] [[Patchwork]] & [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism]] - "''Don't put your trust in democracy, but neither should you put trust in a dictatorship. Rather, put into radical political decentralization''" |
*[[File:Confed.png]] [[Confederalism]], [[File:Urb.png]] [[Patchwork]] & [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism]] - "''Don't put your trust in democracy, but neither should you put trust in a dictatorship. Rather, put into radical political decentralization''" |
||
*[[File:Anpacf.png]] [[Anarcho-Pacifism]] - "''To the contrary, it is only necessary that one decide to withdraw from the compulsory union and reassume one's right to self protection. Indeed, it is essential that one proceed in no other way than by peaceful secession and noncooperation.''"<ref>[https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], |
*[[File:Anpacf.png]] [[Anarcho-Pacifism]] - "''To the contrary, it is only necessary that one decide to withdraw from the compulsory union and reassume one's right to self protection. Indeed, it is essential that one proceed in no other way than by peaceful secession and noncooperation.''"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], chapter 3</ref> |
||
*[[File:Seibt.png]] [[Alt-Lite#Seibtism|Seibtism]] - You're a beauty good girl. |
*[[File:Seibt.png]] [[Alt-Lite#Seibtism|Seibtism]] - You're a beauty good girl. |
||
Line 233: | Line 236: | ||
*[[File:Feud.png]] [[Feudalism]] / [[Aristocracy]] [[File:Arist.png]] - You did come close to the natural order, just stop it with the serfdom part. |
*[[File:Feud.png]] [[Feudalism]] / [[Aristocracy]] [[File:Arist.png]] - You did come close to the natural order, just stop it with the serfdom part. |
||
*[[File:Abmon.png]] [[Absolute Monarchism]] - You're infinitely better than democracy and infinitely worse than anarchy. |
*[[File:Abmon.png]] [[Absolute Monarchism]] - You're infinitely better than democracy and infinitely worse than anarchy. |
||
*[[File:Altr.png]] [[Alt-Right]] - Your ideology appeals way too much to mysticism over rationality, you obsess too much over the racial collective instead of the innate differences of individuals, you're also too much willing to make concessions to socialism as long it puts whites as beneficiaries, which it won't.<ref>Introduction to [https://mises.org/wire/getting-libertarianism-right Getting Libertarianism Right], Sean Gabb</ref> Nonetheless I appreciate that your representatives are willing to get familiar with the works of Rothbard,<ref>[https://mises.org/wire/getting-libertarianism-right Getting Libertarianism Right], |
*[[File:Altr.png]] [[Alt-Right]] - Your ideology appeals way too much to mysticism over rationality, you obsess too much over the racial collective instead of the innate differences of individuals, you're also too much willing to make concessions to socialism as long it puts whites as beneficiaries, which it won't.<ref>Introduction to [https://mises.org/wire/getting-libertarianism-right Getting Libertarianism Right], Sean Gabb</ref> Nonetheless I appreciate that your representatives are willing to get familiar with the works of Rothbard,<ref>[https://mises.org/wire/getting-libertarianism-right Getting Libertarianism Right], chapter 3</ref> and you're welcome to speak at my lectures. I hope I don't have to physically remove you. |
||
*[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]] [[National Capitalism]] - Your hatred of commies and degenerates is admirable, but your love of the state is not. Also, cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks, Mises and Rothbard were both Jewish. |
*[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]] [[National Capitalism]] - Your hatred of commies and degenerates is admirable, but your love of the state is not. Also, cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks, Mises and Rothbard were both Jewish. |
||
*[[File:Kahan.png]] [[Kahanism]] - Same goes for you, the state is not the way. |
*[[File:Kahan.png]] [[Kahanism]] - Same goes for you, the state is not the way. |
||
Line 248: | Line 251: | ||
*[[File:Libertfem.png]] [[Libertarian Feminism]] - At least you care about freedom, but modern feminism has been corrupted by leftists... just don't become one of them OK? |
*[[File:Libertfem.png]] [[Libertarian Feminism]] - At least you care about freedom, but modern feminism has been corrupted by leftists... just don't become one of them OK? |
||
*[[File:Confem.png]] [[Conservative Feminism]] - At least you care about maintaining conservative bourgeoisie morale, but again, don't become one of them. |
*[[File:Confem.png]] [[Conservative Feminism]] - At least you care about maintaining conservative bourgeoisie morale, but again, don't become one of them. |
||
*[[File:AnSynd.png]] [[Anarcho-Syndicalism]] - "''Regarding socialist property that is not reclaimed in this way, syndicalist ideas should be implemented; that is, the ownership of assets should immediately be transferred to those who use them (...). To break up the mostly over-sized socialist production conglomerates, the syndicalist principle should be applied to those production units in which a given individual's work is actually performed (...). Unlike syndicalism, yet of the utmost importance, the property shares thus acquired should be freely tradeable and a stock market established so as to allow a separation of the functions of owner-capitalists and non-owning employees, and the smooth and continuous transfer of assets from less into more value-productive hands.''"<ref>[https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], ch. 6 "On Socialism and Desocialization", by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 2001</ref> |
*[[File:AnSynd.png]] [[Anarcho-Syndicalism]] - "''Regarding socialist property that is not reclaimed in this way, syndicalist ideas should be implemented; that is, the ownership of assets should immediately be transferred to those who use them (...). To break up the mostly over-sized socialist production conglomerates, the syndicalist principle should be applied to those production units in which a given individual's work is actually performed (...). Unlike syndicalism, yet of the utmost importance, the property shares thus acquired should be freely tradeable and a stock market established so as to allow a separation of the functions of owner-capitalists and non-owning employees, and the smooth and continuous transfer of assets from less into more value-productive hands.''"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed], ch. 6 "On Socialism and Desocialization", by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 2001</ref> |
||
*[[File:AnInde.png]] [[Independence Anarchism]] - We both are separatist and anarchist, but you are still a leftist. |
*[[File:AnInde.png]] [[Independence Anarchism]] - We both are separatist and anarchist, but you are still a leftist. |
||
*[[File:Postconan.png]] [[Post-Colonial Anarchism]] - Same as above. |
*[[File:Postconan.png]] [[Post-Colonial Anarchism]] - Same as above. |
||
Line 254: | Line 257: | ||
*[[File:WelfChauvin.png]] [[Welfare Chauvinism]] -"''That is, they subsidize immigration- they force domestic taxpayers to subsidize immigration. In particular, they also subsidize domestic employers who contract foreign cheaper workers''"<ref>[https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/hans-hermann-hoppe/immigration-and-libertarianism/ Immigration and Libertarianism] </ref> |
*[[File:WelfChauvin.png]] [[Welfare Chauvinism]] -"''That is, they subsidize immigration- they force domestic taxpayers to subsidize immigration. In particular, they also subsidize domestic employers who contract foreign cheaper workers''"<ref>[https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/hans-hermann-hoppe/immigration-and-libertarianism/ Immigration and Libertarianism] </ref> |
||
*[[File:LeftCom.png]] [[Italian Left Communism]] -"We Both Dislike Democracy and Anti-Fascism" |
*[[File:LeftCom.png]] [[Italian Left Communism]] -"We Both Dislike Democracy and Anti-Fascism" |
||
*[[File:Bckchn.png]] [[Libertarian Municipalism]] - Leftist that likes ostrakysm too. But his cultural views are kinda cringe and anti-monarchist stances make me yawn. |
|||
===Enemies=== |
===Enemies=== |
||
*[[File:Dem.png]] [[Democracy]] - The god that failed. |
*[[File:Dem.png]] [[Democracy]] - The god that failed. |
||
*[[File:Raddem.png]] [[Radical Democracy]] - The god that failed radically. |
*[[File:Raddem.png]] [[Radical Democracy]] - The god that failed radically. |
||
*[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] [[Revolutionary Progressivism]] - "''They — the advocates of [[File:AntiConservatism.png]] [[Progressivism|alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles]] such as, for instance, [[File:Hedonism.png]]'' {{PCBA|Hedonism|''individual hedonism''}}'', [[File:Parasitism.png]] [[Socialism|parasitism]], [[File:Radenv.png]] [[Radical Environmentalism|nature-environment worship]], [[File:Gay.png]] [[:Category:LGBT|homosexuality]], or [[File:Commie.png]] [[Communism (Disambiguation)|communism]] — will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|a libertarian order]].''"<ref>[https://archive.org/ |
*[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] [[Revolutionary Progressivism]] - "''They — the advocates of [[File:AntiConservatism.png]] [[Progressivism|alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles]] such as, for instance, [[File:Hedonism.png]]'' {{PCBA|Hedonism|''individual hedonism''}}'', [[File:Parasitism.png]] [[Socialism|parasitism]], [[File:Radenv.png]] [[Radical Environmentalism|nature-environment worship]], [[File:Gay.png]] [[:Category:LGBT|homosexuality]], or [[File:Commie.png]] [[Communism (Disambiguation)|communism]] — will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|a libertarian order]].''"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy: The God That Failed], chapter 10, page 218 - "In a covenant concluded among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free (unlimited) speech exists, not even to unlimited speech on one’s own tenant-property. One may say innumerable things and promote almost any idea under the sun, but naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and removed from society. Likewise, in a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance toward those habitually promoting lifestyles incompatible with this goal. They—the advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles such as, for instance, individual hedonism, parasitism, nature-environment worship, homosexuality, or communism—will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain a libertarian order."</ref> |
||
*[[File:Bhl.png]] [[Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism]] - You hijacked Rothbard's legacy then ground it into the dirt, fuck you. |
*[[File:Bhl.png]] [[Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism]] - You hijacked Rothbard's legacy then ground it into the dirt, fuck you. |
||
*[[File:Chilib.png]] [[Chicago School]] - "''Milton Friedman, who bears much responsibility for the post-1971 monetary order and thus for the most inflationary peacetime period in all of human history, is hailed as one of the great economists''"<ref>[https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy: The God That Failed], |
*[[File:Chilib.png]] [[Chicago School]] - "''Milton Friedman, who bears much responsibility for the post-1971 monetary order and thus for the most inflationary peacetime period in all of human history, is hailed as one of the great economists''"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy: The God That Failed], chapter 2, page 59</ref> |
||
*[[File:World.png]] [[Globalism]] - The ultimate statist goal. |
*[[File:World.png]] [[Globalism]] - The ultimate statist goal. |
||
*[[File:Multicult.png]] [[Multiculturalism]] - There can be peaceful coexistence of different cultures along distant, physically separated territory. But Multiculturalism - cultural heterogeneity - cannot exist in one and the same place without leading to diminishing trust, increased tension and the call for a strongman and ultimately the end of libertarian social order. |
*[[File:Multicult.png]] [[Multiculturalism]] - There can be peaceful coexistence of different cultures along distant, physically separated territory. But Multiculturalism - cultural heterogeneity - cannot exist in one and the same place without leading to diminishing trust, increased tension and the call for a strongman and ultimately the end of libertarian social order. |
||
*[[File:Statlib.png]] [[State Liberalism]] - Authoritarian, progressive AND corporatocratic? You are pure evil. |
*[[File:Statlib.png]] [[State Liberalism]] - Authoritarian, progressive AND corporatocratic? You are pure evil. |
||
*[[File:Block.png]] [[ |
*[[File:Block.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Blockiansm]] - Seriously man? Support Israel and be a Zionist? |
||
*[[File:Necon.png]] [[Neoconservatism]] - Stop attacking, killing and bombing people in foreign countries! |
*[[File:Necon.png]] [[Neoconservatism]] - Stop attacking, killing and bombing people in foreign countries! |
||
*[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] - Same with you! |
*[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] - Same with you! |
||
Line 289: | Line 293: | ||
*[[File:Klep.png]] [[Kleptocracy]] - You are not even hiding that you are thieves. |
*[[File:Klep.png]] [[Kleptocracy]] - You are not even hiding that you are thieves. |
||
*[[File:Statecap.png]] [[State Capitalism]] - You are an oxymoron. |
*[[File:Statecap.png]] [[State Capitalism]] - You are an oxymoron. |
||
*[[File:Spencer.png]] [[ |
*[[File:Spencer.png]] [[Contrarianism#Spencerism|Spencerism]] - My poor friend, what happened to you? |
||
*[[File:Annil.png]] [[Anarcho-Nihilism]] - Rejects capitalism, property, social authority, community, tradition, and nation. (At least you reject democracy and socialism too). |
*[[File:Annil.png]] [[Anarcho-Nihilism]] - Rejects capitalism, property, social authority, community, tradition, and nation. (At least you reject democracy and socialism too). |
||
**{{Alias|Annil.png|File:Annil.png|Yes, I hate them all and physically remove yourself, Yellow Tankie.}} |
**{{Alias|Annil.png|File:Annil.png|Yes, I hate them all and physically remove yourself, Yellow Tankie.}} |
||
Line 320: | Line 324: | ||
===Literature=== |
===Literature=== |
||
*[https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed] by [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20230405190518/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Hans-Hermann-Hoppe-Democracy-The-God-That-Failed.pdf Democracy - The God that Failed] by [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
||
*[https://cdn.mises.org/the_great_fiction_2nd_ed_rev.pdf The Great Fiction] by [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
*[https://cdn.mises.org/the_great_fiction_2nd_ed_rev.pdf The Great Fiction] by [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
||
*[https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Private%20Production%20of%20Defense_3.pdf The Private Production of Defense] by [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
*[https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Private%20Production%20of%20Defense_3.pdf The Private Production of Defense] by [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] |
||
Line 363: | Line 367: | ||
{{Navbox/Monarchists}} |
{{Navbox/Monarchists}} |
||
{{Navbox/Reactionaries}} |
{{Navbox/Reactionaries}} |
||
{{Navbox/Conservatives}} |
|||
{{Navbox/Libertarians}} |
{{Navbox/Libertarians}} |
||
[[Category:Culturally Right]] |
[[Category:Culturally Right]] |
||
[[Category:Male Characters]] |
[[Category:Male Characters]] |