×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 788 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Polcompball Wiki

    Hoppeanism: Difference between revisions

    Content deleted Content added
    No edit summary
    Loris1729 (talk | contribs)
    Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
    (13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
    Line 14: Line 14:
    [[File:Anreactlib.png]] Anarcho-Reactionary Liberalism<br>
    [[File:Anreactlib.png]] Anarcho-Reactionary Liberalism<br>
    [[File:ORA.png]] Paleolibertarian Anarcho-Capitalism<br>
    [[File:ORA.png]] Paleolibertarian Anarcho-Capitalism<br>
    [[File:Anpaleobert2.png]] Anarcho-Paleolibertarianism [[File:Anpaleobert.png]]<br>
    [[File:Anpaleobert.png]] Anarcho-Paleolibertarianism<br>
    [[File:AnNatcap.png]] Anarcho-National Capitalism<br>
    [[File:Annatbert.png]] Anarcho-National Libertarianism<br>
    [[File:Annatbert.png]] Anarcho-National Libertarianism<br>
    [[File:Anbertmon.png]] Anarcho-Libertarian Monarchism<br>
    [[File:Anbertmon.png]] Anarcho-Libertarian Monarchism<br>
    Line 52: Line 53:
    *[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] (1949-) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] {{PBW|West Germany}} / [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
    *[[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] (1949-) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] {{PBW|West Germany}} / [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
    *[[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Stephan Kinsella]] (1965-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
    *[[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Stephan Kinsella]] (1965-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
    *[[File:Kogos.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism|Paulo Kogos]] (1986-) [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] {{PBW|Brazilball|Brazil}}
    *[[File:AltBert.png]] [[Alt-Right|Christopher "Chase" Rachels]] (1989-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
    *[[File:AltBert.png]] [[Alt-Right|Christopher "Chase" Rachels]] (1989-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
    *[[File:TaleedJBrown.png]] [[Anarcho-Fascism|Taleed Brown]] (?-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
    *[[File:TaleedJBrown.png]] [[Anarcho-Fascism|Taleed Brown]] (?-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
    Line 106: Line 106:
    [[File:Frankfurt.png]] [[Frankfurt School]]<br>
    [[File:Frankfurt.png]] [[Frankfurt School]]<br>
    [[File:Kant.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Kantian Philosophy]]<br>
    [[File:Kant.png]] [[Enlightenment Thought|Kantian Philosophy]]<br>
    [[File:Natcap.png]] [[National Capitalism]]<ref>[https://archive.org/details/fromnationtohousehold From Nation to Household]<br>
    Selected quotation: "The answer is a program of nationalist capitalism, or capitalistic nationalism. Like Francis' national socialism, the national capitalist program has an economic and a cultural component. The similarities of both programs lie in their cultural components. Both are proponents of cultural conservatism and traditional family-centered morality; both are decidedly Western and propose that America was - and should be - a white European Christian male dominated civilization, and hence both oppose all multi-counter-cultural-egalitarian measures and policies. Both programs differ fundamentally, however, regarding the economic policies which they would combine with this cultural conservatism. National socialism would combine its cultural conservatism with the economic politics of the left. But as was explained, these two programmatic elements are incompatible and cannot be successfully combined. In distinct contrast, national capitalism hies to combine cultural conservatism with traditional American laissez-faire capitalism as proposed by old-fashioned 'Austrian' school economists from Bob-Bawerk to Mises and Rothbard - the mortal enemies of the socialists of all stripes from Marx on up to his present social-democratic-liberal-neoconservative followers. In so doing, the national capitalist program has from the outset the distinctive advantage of combining what can - and indeed must - be combined if one wishes to reach one's set goal."</ref><br>
    [[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]]<br>
    [[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]]<br>
    [[File:AntiAntiAbortion.png]] Pro-Choice<br>
    [[File:AntiAntiAbortion.png]] Pro-Choice<br>
    Line 132: Line 134:
    Despite being named after the German economist Hans-Hermann Hoppe, the ideology itself can be tracked back before Hoppe, to the founder of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], Murray Rothbard, as well as Lew Rockwell, in the form of the [[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism|Paleolibertarian movement]] (although generally distinguished from the wider movement by being fundamentally Anarcho-Capitalist, instead of just generally). Hoppe having done some particular contributions, although these were generally also recognized by Rothbard, making it sort of redundant to call Hoppeanism an ideology of its own due to the fact that it overlaps with Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism almost entirely. The ideology is prominent within and associated with the think tank Mises Institute (as such it's represented by it's symbol).
    Despite being named after the German economist Hans-Hermann Hoppe, the ideology itself can be tracked back before Hoppe, to the founder of [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], Murray Rothbard, as well as Lew Rockwell, in the form of the [[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism|Paleolibertarian movement]] (although generally distinguished from the wider movement by being fundamentally Anarcho-Capitalist, instead of just generally). Hoppe having done some particular contributions, although these were generally also recognized by Rothbard, making it sort of redundant to call Hoppeanism an ideology of its own due to the fact that it overlaps with Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalism almost entirely. The ideology is prominent within and associated with the think tank Mises Institute (as such it's represented by it's symbol).


    Due to memes regarding the helicopters the ideology is associated with [[File:Pinochet.png]] [[Pinochetism]], although it is important to note that, despite this meme being quite popular within political communities, Hoppe, and most thinkers associated, do not actually favour throwing [[File:Commie.png]] [[Marxism#Communism|communists]] and [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|socialists]] out of helicopters, merely favouring ostracism and exclusion from the property of the residents of certain "covenant community" (as he calls private communities).<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt0TWTVyY9Q Hoppe speaks on Physical Removal - no helicopters, sorry]</ref>. He also opposes NATO, which supported Pinochet.
    Due to memes regarding the helicopters the ideology is associated with [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] [[Pinochetism]], although it is important to note that, despite this meme being quite popular within political communities, Hoppe, and most thinkers associated, do not actually favour throwing [[File:Commie.png]] [[Marxism#Communism|communists]] and [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|socialists]] out of helicopters, merely favouring ostracism and exclusion from the property of the residents of certain "covenant community" (as he calls private communities).<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt0TWTVyY9Q Hoppe speaks on Physical Removal - no helicopters, sorry]</ref>. He also opposes NATO, which supported Pinochet.


    ==Beliefs==
    ==Beliefs==
    Line 139: Line 141:
    One of the inputs which Hoppe made to Anarcho-Capitalism, although also recognized by [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Anarcho-Capitalism's]] creator, Murray Rothbard, as "a dazzling breakthrough for political philosophy in general and for libertarianism in particular"<ref>Symposium (November 1988). [http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/files/printarchive/Liberty_Magazine_November_1988.pdf "Hans-Hermannn Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics: Breakthrough or Buncombe?"] (PDF). Liberty. 2 (2): 44–54.</ref> is argumentation ethics, which could, in short, be defined as proof provided by Hoppe for the ethics of right-libertarian conception of property rights developed in 1988. It aims to prove that arguing against the right-libertarian interpretation of self-ownership (which extends the concept to include control of private property as part of the self<ref>[https://mises.org/sites/default/files/economics_and_ethics_of_private_property_2020.pdf "The Economics and Ethics of Private Property"] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 1993</ref>) is contradictory and thus not logically coherent. Although this, at first, could sound like something that would come to be a widely popular theory within [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarian]] circles, the reception was mixed.<ref>Kinsella, Stephan (March 13, 2009). [http://archive.mises.org/9610/revisiting-argumentation-ethics/ "Revisiting Argumentation Ethics".] Mises Economics Blog. Ludwig von Mises Institute.</ref>
    One of the inputs which Hoppe made to Anarcho-Capitalism, although also recognized by [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Anarcho-Capitalism's]] creator, Murray Rothbard, as "a dazzling breakthrough for political philosophy in general and for libertarianism in particular"<ref>Symposium (November 1988). [http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/files/printarchive/Liberty_Magazine_November_1988.pdf "Hans-Hermannn Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics: Breakthrough or Buncombe?"] (PDF). Liberty. 2 (2): 44–54.</ref> is argumentation ethics, which could, in short, be defined as proof provided by Hoppe for the ethics of right-libertarian conception of property rights developed in 1988. It aims to prove that arguing against the right-libertarian interpretation of self-ownership (which extends the concept to include control of private property as part of the self<ref>[https://mises.org/sites/default/files/economics_and_ethics_of_private_property_2020.pdf "The Economics and Ethics of Private Property"] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; 1993</ref>) is contradictory and thus not logically coherent. Although this, at first, could sound like something that would come to be a widely popular theory within [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarian]] circles, the reception was mixed.<ref>Kinsella, Stephan (March 13, 2009). [http://archive.mises.org/9610/revisiting-argumentation-ethics/ "Revisiting Argumentation Ethics".] Mises Economics Blog. Ludwig von Mises Institute.</ref>


    To explain it briefly, Hoppe takes note that, to have an argument, one must presupose self-ownership and thus certain norms, such as, and being the main one, non-violence among the participants, and that one must be able to act; these norms were named the "a priori of argumentation" (APoA) by Hoppe.<br> Hoppe then says that, to argue against [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], which he argues is the most pure expression of self-ownership, is to argue against self-ownership itself, thus one's proposition must be denying the fundamental presupposed propositions of argumentation, while in the course of argumentation, denying their own self-ownership. Thus, if one argues against self-ownership, then they're involved in a performative contradiction which empties the argument of its meaning, since argumentation also presupposes the law of non-contradiction.<ref>[http://www.hanshoppe.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/hoppe_ult_just_liberty.pdf "The Ultimate Justification of Private Property" (PDF).] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (September 1988).</ref>
    To explain it briefly, Hoppe takes note that, to have an argument, one must presuppose self-ownership and thus certain norms, such as, and being the main one, non-violence among the participants, and that one must be able to act; these norms were named the "a priori of argumentation" (APoA) by Hoppe.<br> Hoppe then says that, to argue against [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]], which he argues is the most pure expression of self-ownership, is to argue against self-ownership itself, thus one's proposition must be denying the fundamental presupposed propositions of argumentation, while in the course of argumentation, denying their own self-ownership. Thus, if one argues against self-ownership, then they're involved in a performative contradiction which empties the argument of its meaning, since argumentation also presupposes the law of non-contradiction.<ref>[http://www.hanshoppe.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/hoppe_ult_just_liberty.pdf "The Ultimate Justification of Private Property" (PDF).] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (September 1988).</ref>


    ===Private Law Society===
    ===Private Law Society===
    Line 214: Line 216:
    *[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]] - Dearest father.
    *[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]] - Dearest father.
    *[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]] - The superior economic school of thought. Mises was certainly the greatest economist of all time.
    *[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School]] - The superior economic school of thought. Mises was certainly the greatest economist of all time.
    *[[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]] [[Korwinism]] [[File:Korwinism (UPR).png]] - We have a shared appreciation for liberty, property and tradition.
    *[[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]] [[Korwinism]] - We have a shared appreciation for liberty, property and tradition.
    *[[File:Agorismf.png]] [[Agorism]] - Counter economics is admirable. We must stop the left from acquiring further power and disobedience of the state is very much a practice to be promoted and celebrated.
    *[[File:Agorismf.png]] [[Agorism]] - Counter economics is admirable. We must stop the left from acquiring further power and disobedience of the state is very much a practice to be promoted and celebrated.
    *[[File:Anmona.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism]] - Monarchy is much better at keeping the growth of the state in check, and we don't need a state to have a king!
    *[[File:Anmona.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism]] - Monarchy is much better at keeping the growth of the state in check, and we don't need a state to have a king!
    Line 255: Line 257:
    *[[File:WelfChauvin.png]] [[Welfare Chauvinism]] -"''That is, they subsidize immigration- they force domestic taxpayers to subsidize immigration. In particular, they also subsidize domestic employers who contract foreign cheaper workers''"<ref>[https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/hans-hermann-hoppe/immigration-and-libertarianism/ Immigration and Libertarianism] </ref>
    *[[File:WelfChauvin.png]] [[Welfare Chauvinism]] -"''That is, they subsidize immigration- they force domestic taxpayers to subsidize immigration. In particular, they also subsidize domestic employers who contract foreign cheaper workers''"<ref>[https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/hans-hermann-hoppe/immigration-and-libertarianism/ Immigration and Libertarianism] </ref>
    *[[File:LeftCom.png]] [[Italian Left Communism]] -"We Both Dislike Democracy and Anti-Fascism"
    *[[File:LeftCom.png]] [[Italian Left Communism]] -"We Both Dislike Democracy and Anti-Fascism"
    *[[File:Bckchn.png]] [[Libertarian Municipalism]] - Leftist that likes ostrakysm too. But his cultural views are kinda cringe and anti-monarchist stances make me yawn.


    ===Enemies===
    ===Enemies===
    Line 265: Line 268:
    *[[File:Multicult.png]] [[Multiculturalism]] - There can be peaceful coexistence of different cultures along distant, physically separated territory. But Multiculturalism - cultural heterogeneity - cannot exist in one and the same place without leading to diminishing trust, increased tension and the call for a strongman and ultimately the end of libertarian social order.
    *[[File:Multicult.png]] [[Multiculturalism]] - There can be peaceful coexistence of different cultures along distant, physically separated territory. But Multiculturalism - cultural heterogeneity - cannot exist in one and the same place without leading to diminishing trust, increased tension and the call for a strongman and ultimately the end of libertarian social order.
    *[[File:Statlib.png]] [[State Liberalism]] - Authoritarian, progressive AND corporatocratic? You are pure evil.
    *[[File:Statlib.png]] [[State Liberalism]] - Authoritarian, progressive AND corporatocratic? You are pure evil.
    *[[File:Block.png]] [[Jewish Anarchism|Blockism]] - Seriously man? Support Israel and be a Zionist?
    *[[File:Block.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Blockiansm]] - Seriously man? Support Israel and be a Zionist?
    *[[File:Necon.png]] [[Neoconservatism]] - Stop attacking, killing and bombing people in foreign countries!
    *[[File:Necon.png]] [[Neoconservatism]] - Stop attacking, killing and bombing people in foreign countries!
    *[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] - Same with you!
    *[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] - Same with you!
    Line 364: Line 367:
    {{Navbox/Monarchists}}
    {{Navbox/Monarchists}}
    {{Navbox/Reactionaries}}
    {{Navbox/Reactionaries}}
    {{Navbox/Conservatives}}
    {{Navbox/Libertarians}}
    {{Navbox/Libertarians}}

    [[Category:Culturally Right]]
    [[Category:Culturally Right]]
    [[Category:Male Characters]]
    [[Category:Male Characters]]
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

    Recent changes

  • TheElectricBomb • 2 minutes ago
  • TheElectricBomb • 3 minutes ago
  • TheElectricBomb • 4 minutes ago
  • Nfan • 5 minutes ago
  • Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.