Libertarian Conservatism

From Polcompball Wiki
Revision as of 22:23, 14 February 2021 by Ohnothisisbad (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search


Libertarian Conservatism (LibCon) also known as Fusionism or Conservative Libertarianism is an economically and culturally right-wing libertarian ideology who is the son of Conservatism and Libertarianism, pretty similar to Paleolibertarianism, although it could be seen as if Libertarian Conservatism was more of a group of different kinds of ideologies rather than an uniform movement, and Paleolibertarianism being one of these sub-ideologies inside of the Conlibert group.

It advocates for the greatest economic freedom and least possible government interference, both in the economy and social life as a whole, mirroring Classical Liberal Laissez-Faire Capitalism. It prioritizes liberty and freedom of choice and believes this will help to server conservative ends. It emphasizes the role of authority and duty in social life[1].

It can be seen as ideology which emphasizes the promotion of civil liberties and civil society through conservative institutions, such as the family, religion, among others, and authority, while still trying to reduce the overall coercive power and authority derivative from the state.[2]

History

Frank Meyer

The term started to be known when a prominent contributor in the National Review, a conservative editorial, Frank Meyer, described his ideology as a fusion of Libertarian and Conservative ideals in the 50s decade[3]. In his most influential book, In Defense of Freedom, Meyer defined freedom in what Isaiah Berlin would label "negative" terms as the minimization of the use of coercion by the state in its essential role of preventing one person's freedom from intruding upon another's.

Ron Paul

Then, in the year 1975, former President of the United States, Ronald Reagan, in an interview with Reason, trying to appeal to Libertarian circles, declared to "believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism"[4]. Although he was later criticized by many Libertarians, including Murray Rothbard[5] and Ron Paul, who was previously a supporter of Reagan. Ron Paul later declared being disillusioned with Reagan's administration and expressed his disgust on many policies, such as the 1981 budget bill, and apologized for supporting the former President Ronald Reagan and resigned as congressman.[6].

Murray Rothbard

Radically influenced by Classical Liberalism and anti-regulationist along with being a big advocator of anti-war policies, Rothbard who had become the most influential figure on US Libertarianism[7] strongly influenced and re-shaped the Old Right movement, after his departure from the New Left (Especially within Market Anarchist cirles) which he helped to shape as well and used to build relationships with other Libertarian sectors.

Rothbard, after breaking with said New Left sector, had started to involve more and more in an alliance with the growing Paleoconservative movement, seen by many observers, between Libertarian and non-Libertarian circles, as flirting with racism and social reaction[8][9]. Rothbard then, regarding these critiques, suggested that Libertarians needed to appeal and make themselves look more acceptable to socially and culturally conservative people.

Paleolibertarianism

After some time of this alliance with the Paleoconservative movement some Libertarians, such as Lew Rockwell[10] or Jeffrey Tucker, started self-identifying with the term "Paleolibertarian", more specifically a Christian wing of it. These Libertarians continued their opposition to all forms of government intervention, including cultural and social, while still upholding cultural conservatism in social thought and behavior. They opposed a Licentious Libertarianism which advocated "freedom from bourgeois morality, and social authority."[11] Rockwell later stated to have dropped that self-description[12] because people confused it with Paleoconservatism which Libertarians such as Rockwell rejected. Rockwell also affirmed Paleoconservatives could be seen as "reducing liberty, not increasing it, through a form of publicly subsidized right to trespass."[13]

Hoppe

More recently, and still worth taking note of on the topic of Libertarian Conservative philosophers, we have Hoppe's Anarcho-Capitalism, whose ideology is yet another form of Libertarian Conservatism and/or Paleolibertarianism. Hoppe's belief in rights of property were used to justify owners (of land) to establish what he calls private "covenant communities," from which certain people may be excluded from depending on what the owner of said community desires. He also regards the ostracism towards certain people within certain community as a viable way of peacefully relocating in case the members of the community desire so, by which their relocation is directly advocated yet not legally enforced.[14]. Hoppe made the argument in favor of ostracism specifically about certain sectors of the population such as File:Soc.png Communists, Democracy advocators, who he regarded as a threat to freedom and property in the long run. But, although it's commonly thought to be as so, Hoppe does not hate Homosexuals, nor advocates for ostracism towards these groups; he simply has regarded them as higher-time preferenced people. Hoppe later also became even more controversial among Libertarian circles for his advocacy on closed borders and restricted immigration[15] and his critiques to mainstream Libertarian movements, declaring that Libertarianism should become a culturally conservative movement in nature.[16] Hoppe also at times, and also being a controversial topic within Libertarian circles, argued for the superiority of systems like Monarchism or Aristocracy above others like Democracy.[17][18]

Personality and Behaviour

Libcon is usually portrayed as a combination of Boomer behavior with Boogaloo style Libertarianism.

How to Draw

Flag of Libertarian Conservatism
  1. Draw a ball,
  2. Make the bottom two thirds Yellow
  3. Make the top Blue and draw 3 white stars in the area.
  4. Draw the eyes, and you're done!

Template:Flag-color

Relationships

Friends

Frenemies

  • Hoppeanism - Basically a more extreme version of me and Paleolib, sorta based but quite racist.

Enemies

Further Information

Wikipedia

Literature

Articles

References

  1. Heywood 2015, p. 37
  2. Hans Hermann Hermann (2018). Getting Libertarianism Right
  3. Feser, Edward (December 22, 2001). "What Libertarianism Isn't".
  4. [1]
  5. Rothbard, Murray (1984). [2]. Free Life: The Journal of the Libertarian Alliance. Libertarian Alliance. '4 (1): 1–7. Retrieved September 20, 2020 – via the Mises Institute.
  6. Kutzmann, David M. (May 24, 1988). "Small Party Battles Big Government Libertarian Candidate Opposes Intrusion into Private Lives". San Jose Mercury News: 12A.
  7. Raimondo, Enemy 372-83.
  8. Sheffield, Matthew (2 September 2016). "Where did Donald Trump get his racialized rhetoric? From libertarians" The Washington Post.
  9. Lewis, Matt (23 August 2017). "The Insidious Libertarian-to-Alt-Right Pipeline". The Daily Beast.
  10. Rockwell, Lew. "The Case for Paleo-libertarianism" (PDF) on September 7, 2018.
  11. Rockwell, Lew. "The Case for Paleo-libertarianism" (PDF) on September 7, 2018.
  12. Kenny Johnsson, Do You Consider Yourself a Libertarian?, interview with Lew Rockwell, May 25, 2007.
  13. Rockwell, Llewellyn H. (May 2, 2002). "What I Learned From Paleoism".
  14. Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (11 April 2005). "My Battle With The Thought Police". Mises Institute. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
  15. Libertarian Papers Vol. 8, No. 1 (2016); Public Property and the Libertarian immigration debate by Simon Guenzl.
  16. Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Democracy: The God That Failed (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction 2001) 189.
  17. From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy by Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2014).
  18. Democracy: The God that failed by Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2016).

Gallery

Template:Libright Template:Caps Template:Libertarian Template:Conservative