Kraterocracy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 84:
[[Category:Government Systems]]
[[Category:Pejorative terms]]
|
Revision as of 22:44, 6 May 2021
Kraterocracy is an off-the-compass
AuthRight ideology that believes it is the natural right of the strong to subjugate and tyrannize the weak. While
Social Darwinism merely calls for the utter extermination of the weak, Kraterocracy calls for their complete subjugation. The only hope for the weak of achieving an even tolerable existence is to ascend the ranks via brute strength or manipulation.
As such, Kraterocracy is highly comparable to an incredibly extreme and physical form of Oligarchy.
Beliefs
Kraterocracy believes in a system where the expression 'might makes right' is applied to governance. A kraterocratic government would be ruled the strongest in society, most commonly through physical violence. However, a system like this could also be ruled by the most manipulative people as well, with people able to size power through their abilities as a demagogue, rather than as a fighter. Nonetheless, kratocratic systems are often associated with physical force.
Personality and Behaviour
Kraterocracy combines the "might-makes-right" attitude of Social Darwinism, with the imposing, intimidating, and calculating demeanor of
Ingsoc. He will not hesitate to punch, fight, and/or utterly obliterate any and all who stand in his way, but usually refrains from doing so for the sake of polite conversation and political subterfuge.
How to Draw
- Draw a ball,
- Fill the ball in almost black (#202020),
- Draw a dark blue (#000099) omega symbol (Ω) in the middle of the ball,
- Add a single eye in the center of the omega and you're done!
- (Optional) Add a sword or a weapon of choice.
Relationships
Friends
Imperialism - Weak nations deserve to be oppressed.
Posadism - You possess nuclear armaments? A worthy foe.
Social Darwinism - A worthy foe, even if you lack structure.
Combatocracy - Even if we fight, in the end, the strongest will rule.
Stratocracy - Who is stronger than trained soldiers, I ask?
Autocracy - An autocratic leader would be the strongest in their nation so they are in the right.
Crusadism - Closest thing to a real world counterpart of mine.
Frenemies
Ingsoc - You may subjugate the weak, but in their luxury and brainwashing, the Inner party grows weak as well.
Avaritionism - Your strong may succeed, but what is the purpose of strength if not to subjugate?
Hive-Mind Collectivism - You do establish sovereignty, but if every foe is alike, what weak is there to subjugate?
Kleptocracy - Why must you keep your strength secret? Make your deception known.
Oligarchy- If only you were as strong as me, but you're not so I cannot be your friend.
National Socialism - A moderate whose meekness makes him a weak foe.
Capitalism - Yes, there is no unjust hierarchy, but living in luxury makes him a weak foe.
Reactionary Socialism - A somewhat worthy foe whose weakness is compassion for the poor. How pitiful.
Enemies
- File:Ego.png Egoism - No gods? No kings? A life not worth living.
Communalism - Opposition is essential to assert one's strength.
Soulism - There is no such thing as an unjust hierarchy.
Veganarchism - Yes, subjugation includes animals, for they are weaker entities.
Anarcho-Primitivism - Why commit to using such rudimentary weaponry?