×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 787 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Polcompball Wiki
    Revision as of 23:39, 17 August 2023 by Razbop26 (talk | contribs)

    Not to be confused with Corporatocracy.

    {{Ideology |themecolor=#FFFFFF |textcolor=#1E1E1E |title= Corporatism |image=32215646.png |caption="Workers of the world, produce 40,000 cars this month, and sell them at 1,500 dollars."

    |aliases=

    Corporatocracy (Erroneously)
    Corp
    The Body
    Corpus
    Incel economy
    Authoritarian Class dealignment
    Economic Fascism (Somewhat pejoratively)
    Third Position economics
    Class Collaborationism (both by opponents and Third Positionist supporters)

    |alignments= AuthUnity
    Third Position
    Corporatists
    Nationalists (Usually) |influences= Class Dealignment
    Communitarianism
    Nationalism (Usually)
    Regulationism
    Syndicalism
    Technocracy
    Thomism

    |influenced=

    |variants=

    Christian Corporatism

    Conservative Corporatism

    Liberal Corporatism {{Collapse|

    }}

    Corporate Statism/Economic Fascism

    Democratic Corporatism

    |regional=

    Federism

    |song= |likes=Efficiency
    Metaphors about human bodies
    Class Collaboration
    Fascism |dislikes=Being confused with Corporatocracy
    Being solely aassociated with Fascism
    Laissez-faire economics
    Communism
    Marxism
    Class Struggle

    |theorists= Americas

    Europe

    |examples=WIP }} Corporatism is an economically third position, authoritarian ideology that advocates for the organization of society into specialized employment sectors, such as agriculture, military, engineering and others, referred to as "corporations". Individuals are assigned to these corporations based on their interests and skills, and their employment is aligned with the goals set by the government, such as achieving a monthly production target of 40,000 cars. Corporatism promotes a cross-class system of regulation, where workers, employers, and the state engage in negotiations to efficiently manage the economy and ideally satisfy (in theory) all parties involved.

    Variants

      Corporate Statism

    Corporate Statism, or State Corporatism, is a political culture and a form of corporatism whose adherents hold that the corporate group, which forms the basis of society, is the state. The state requires all members of a particular economic sector to join an officially designated interest group. Such interest groups thus attain public status, and they participate in national policymaking. As a result, the state has great control over the groups, and groups have great control over their members. This form of corporatism is the form of corporatism practised by fascists and other authoritarian ideologies.

      Class Collaborationism

    Class Collaboration is a principle of social organization based upon the belief that the division of society into a hierarchy of social classes is a positive and essential aspect of civilization. This view is directly contrasted with Marxist ideas of class conflict, since class conflict seeks to end the socio-economic classes between the rich and the poor, while class collaboration seeks to mitigate the effects between these different classes. Class collaboration has its vocal supporters from fascists, social democrats, liberals, and other regulatory ideologies.

      Christian Corporatism

    Christian Corporatism is a version of corporatism applied by Christian democrats and other religious ideologies related to it. The economic application of Christian corporatism has promoted consultations between employers and workers and has sponsored Christian trade unionism.

      Conservative Corporatism

    Conservative Corporatism' believe society and the economy should be structured around hierarchy and fostering the skills of social groups as well as support for status-related welfare. It is supported by many Traditionalist Conservatives as an alternative to Capitalism and Socialism believing both economic theories to be destructive to society.

    FileFile:Libcorp.png: Liberal Corporatism

    Liberal Corporatism rose from the philosophy of John Stuart Mill as a means to improve representation and equality for workers, through advocating allowing workers to give a voice in the management of companies. Unlike other forms of Corporatism, Liberal Corporatism is content with capitalism rather than reforming through replacing it. Furthermore, Liberal Coropartism was adopted by many American Progressives who believe it as a means to improve the condition of the working class.

    History

    Corporatism has to some extent always existed, as its tendencies appear in many authoritarian-leaning states and systems that desire aspects of both a command and market economy. The ideology as a proper concept began with writings commissioned by Pope Leo XIII in 1881, attempting to resurrect the social and economic situation of "  guild based socialism." Corporatism was also created to some extent to avoid and suppress the   Marxist concept of class conflict and replace it with class collaboration. Seeking for the state to mediate conflicts between individual firms, employees, and economic sectors (corporations) in order to maximize economic efficiency and social harmony. Corporatism has been popular in many   Reactionary and non-Capitalistic right-wing circles, as it functions on a largely collective basis and attempts to stifle over-eager individualism and competitiveness. It was picked up by many former   Syndicalists who moved on to the emerging   Fascist movement, having a few things in common despite not wishing to abolish the class structure. It was adopted in practice in Fascist Italy and the Regency of Carnaro, in which economic sectors were given representative authority and state-guaranteed powers of negotiation and arbitration. Despite this strong association with fascism, there were also several   Social Liberals who advocated for corporatist economics known as Liberal Corporatism, which rejected traditional corporatism's anti-capitalism and authoritarianism and was influenced by economist   John Stuart Mill. This line of thinking was influential in the New Deal era of the United States and is most prominent today in the   Nordic Model. On a theoretical level, corporatism has also been influenced by the writings of Emile Durkheim and Ferdinand Tönnies on solidarity and community.

    Stylistic Notes

    How To Draw

    Corporatism's emblem design represents a fasces without the axe (a tied bundle of sticks), which is a symbol of corporatist economics tied to their origin in fascism.

     
    Flag of Corporatism
    1. Draw a ball
    2. Draw five long vertical black lines in the middle, making sure they do not reach the edges of the ball
    3. Draw two horizontal red lines running through the upper and lower halves of the black lines
    4. Add two eyes

    You are done!

    Color Name HEX RGB
    White #FFFFFF 255, 255, 255
    Black #141414 20, 20, 20
    Red #FF0000 255, 0, 0


    Relationships

    Friends

    Frenemies

    •   Capitalist Communism - Yes, I admit that I borrowed some ideas from capitalism and communism, but I only took the best ones.
    •   Anarcho-Egoism - Do you hate socialism and capitalism at the same time? Then I have an alternative...
    •   Capitalism - Cringe market economy but at least you have hierarchies.
    •   Fascism - While I'm honored you chose me as the traditional economy for your system, you've caused people to think of me as the "fascist economy" which is cringe and inaccurate.
    •   Nazism - Same as above, but even more harmful for my image.
    •   Marxism–Leninism - The transitory state you have is cool, but besides that you're cringe.
    •   State Socialism - Getting rid of corporations is kinda cringe.
    •   Dengism - Another decent form of state capitalism. But I'm not that interested in establishing socialism by 2050.
    •   Social Democracy - Democracy? Disgusting. Besides that, you're ok.
    •   Titoism - Cringe like your   father but at least you have the balls to be authoritarian.
    •   Reactionary Socialism - Not exactly the direction I had in mind, too extremely right socially and too decentralized for my liking (feudalism in the 21st century, really?), but at least likes authoritarianism and hierarchies.
    •   Neoliberalism - Please focus on serving the common interest.
    •   Kemalism - Based on your categorization of people by professions, not classes. Solidarisme is based. But why didn't you start corporations?

    Enemies

    Further Information

    Literature

    Wikipedia

    Gallery

    Navigation


    Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "Note", but no corresponding <references group="Note"/> tag was found

    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

    Recent changes

  • Rigourdigga • 10 minutes ago
  • Rigourdigga • 10 minutes ago
  • Rigourdigga • 10 minutes ago
  • Rigourdigga • 11 minutes ago
  • Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.