User:SweatingCup2632

From Polcompball Wiki
Revision as of 14:56, 10 November 2021 by SweatingCup2632 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

My ideology is an economically independent and culturally centre-right ideology that advocates a welfare state that, however, also provides progressive business subsidies to fuel competition and pro-consumer growth. I think high public spendings shall be repaid from GDP, growth, a reformed taxation system and international trade. Unlike the socialist model of interventionism, my ideology relies on tax cuts, subsidies and negative taxes, rather than regular taxation, so as not to drive away investment. My ideology is culturally conservative, but with progressive views on abortion, LGBTQ+ rights and contraception, although its movements should take everything more carefully

Invalid userTemplate:User-ideology


"The truth does not exist. There is only common thought, [...] which is an artificial construct"

- SweatingCup2632

Opinion concerning current conflicts and disputes

Israel-Palestinian Conflict: Palestine has been jewish since the late bronze age

Russian-Ukrainian Conflict: Keep those pesky russian out of Crimea!

PRC vs ROC (Taiwan): Oh, you mean the Communist Rebels vs Real China

Northern Cyprus: It is no more than a turkish puppet

Greenland dispute: Look at the babies fighting over an ice rock...

Belarus : Putin's puppet regime shall not survive through the next century. Better than the liblefts though

Brexit: YES! Without the EU, we'll reach the sta- oh wait, we ran out of petrol

Kosovo : It is basically Albania

Afghanistan File:Taliban ball.png : Long live Old Afghanistan!

Economic Policies

My economic doctrine revolves around the concept of creating a stable, secure and profitable environment for businesses through policies designed to stimulate economic growth (such as subsidies, soft loans, crisis intervention at the discretion of companies...) and minimise the possibility of insolvency. These policies will be implemented in a way that balances a welfare state, with high public spending and high standards for wages. The sources of revenue for the state will be caused by expected economic growth and, consequently, GDP growth, and by a taxation system focused on a few progressive and universal taxes that are fair. I am pro-free market vis-à-vis nations with a market comparable or better than the national one, because there is no risk of them replacing yours, whereas with nations like China or India the tables are turned. The domestic market must always be the convenient one. As for inflation, it will be controlled through centralisation of the currency, coupled with bullish trading policies that follow the needs of the moment in a malleable and responsive manner, as well as rare shock appreciation policies in cases of very serious crises. Lastly, trade unions should not exist; they should be replaced by non-aligned semi-state associations that find the intersection between the interests of workers, the employer and, secondarily, the state.

Monetary Policies

I believe that banks should play a fundamental role in the monetary stability of the country. Since my economic programme envisages fast economic growth, it is important to keep inflation at acceptable levels (3% at the most). Therefore, banks will have to constantly adapt their programmes to the current economic scenario in order to maintain a perpetual inflationary equilibrium.

How interventionism should be handled without hurting the economy

Alas, regulationism in history has caused some trouble, and all (or most) of it for one reason: regulationism was run cumbersomely. The policies implemented most of the time were incompatible with the natural functioning of the market, often leading to a sick and dependent market on the decidedly not eternal subsidies. In my view, however, interventionism must have the dual purpose of welfare and economic growth. For example, if you need to hire people in an area, you focus on the most productive sectors by going along with financial forecasts and thus giving the initial financial boost to a growth process that must be autonomous.

Government

I would like to see a federal presidential republic, therefore with autonomous regions but loyal to the legitimacy of the central government. This republic would crack down on corruption, money laundering and various other behaviours that could damage the functioning and/or image of the state, through heavy penalties and infiltration of parliamentary circles

My personal ideology

I have called the sum of all my political, economic and social doctrines into a new ideology called "Tricolourism", the name of which derives from the tricolour of the post-Napoleonic republics.

Relationships

Friends

Users

  • Ninjack-Aus - Interventionist ✔, federalist ✔, nordic-model based ideology ✔. I agree on making taxes more equal, but don't raise them too much for rich people either, it's not for not making them starve, but it's in order to attract investments. In general, his policies are on the right track, but a bit too aggressive to capitalism and contradictory (he's also too liberal)
  • BeryAb - He could be a little less globalist (economically), but the rest is really good!
  • Magicpeartree - Good start, but he should be way less socialist
  • ChiroPro - We both like capitalism and welfare, but he's too friendly with the File:Soc.png socialists
  • Kirbly - His policies are way too File:Prog.png progressive, but his economic policies, even in taxation (regulationist but pro-investments), make him deserve a sit here
  • Pirate Tails - He's a progcon and Social Liberal, I wish he was less eurosceptic tho
  • ArGyro - I wish the Byzantine Empire was back Excellent idea to discourage foreign monopolies, but you don't want to discourage foreign investments completely, do you?
  • Matteel - We have so many policies in common, but I'm not sure about your view of File:PCB-Cap.png capitalism, maybe too interventionist and pro-unions for me
  • Me - Seriously, my policies are kinda unique

Frenemies

  • File:Soc.png Socialism - Tax the rich? Universal Basic Income?? DISCOURAGING INVESTMENTS??? What drugs are you on?! Well, at least we agree on the social part...
  • Protectionism - It really depends on your country and the tariffed countries, I'd allow european countries as they have an high quality market which can't replace yours, unlike China or India
  • Conservative Socialism - Same as above, also how can socialism be conservative at all?
  • Peronism - Ugh, you got sooo close, but I can't forgive you for all those taxes and tariffs
  • Anarcho-Capitalism - How about monopolies and wages?
  • Alt-Lite - We both love capitalism, but you're way too nationalist for me
  • Trumpism - You helped corporacies without increasing citizen's purchasing power. Fatal error
  • LGBT Community - I support the equality between heterosexuals and everyone else, but you sometimes cross the line
  • File:Progress.png Progressivism - I agree with you in many things, but you are hypocrite sometimes
  • Minarchism - Market needs regulation to fulfill consumer's interests and stimulate competition. We both want low company taxes though
  • Anarcho-Capitalism - Same as above, but that's too far, you know?
  • Avaritionism - That's way too far
  • Libertarian Leftists - Some of your ideals are good, but please, grow the hell up
  • Apoliticism - Either you want it or not, politics will be an important factor in your life
  • Christian Theocracy - I don't believe, but I respect who does. I'd just like if you stop manipulating poor people's mind tho, Christianity is the message of Jesus Christ, not whether or not abortion is legal!
  • Imperialism - You're a disgusting being who enslaves poor countries! Now, what was your idea about that new low-price pipeline?
  • Absolute Monarchism - I understand the cultural heritage, but absolute monarchism has never done anything good
  • Liberalism - I KNOW YOU HAVE RIGHTS, BUT NOW GET THIS VACCINE FOR GOODNESS SAKE!
  • Laissez-Faire - We agree on the fact the market can survive on its own, but how about monopolies and eguality?
  • Stratocracy - I too like law and order, but the army mustn't take over
  • Futurism - You had potential, yet you're just the son of him and him

Users

Enemies

  • Fascism - You hate everything: capitalism, File:Soc.png socialism, libertarianism, neoliberalism...
  • National Socialism - You only had a mere paternalistic view of welfare and production, you built your economy on war, exploiting the high demand before and during the war of military goods; however, even if you somehow won the war, it wouldn't have been long before your economy would collapse after the aggregate demand for those only goods you built your economy on would fall
  • Corporatocracy - Market needs regulation and competitivity, not monopoly
  • Corporatism - Yeah, everything good on paper, but in reality, as both communist and fascist countries proved, the government will always try to get on top, thus avoiding paying high wages with high working hours 'cause.. who's stopping them?
  • Alt-Right - What is even keeping all of you together?
  • Anti-Environmentalism - I understand debating on whether or not it's worth it to spend a lot of money on an eco-friendly economy, but deliberately killing the enviroment? WHY?
  • Accelerationism - You need therapy
  • INGSOC - I get the feeling, but Jesus Christ!
  • Social Credit (NOT the chinese one, it's a completely different thing) - As I commented, your economics are flawed, the income generated from retail's revenues wouldn't be able to pay alone the debt incurred by the companies without a huge tax burder or unregulated money creation system which would bring to a serious inflation
  • Neo-Ottomanism - 1529 Intensifies
  • Islamic Theocracy - How is this still allowed in the 21st century?
  • Islamic Democracy - Choose either islamic or democratic, both is not possible
  • Kakistocracy - Do I even have to explain this one?
  • Anarchism - I used to be an anarchist, then I started elementary school
  • State Liberalism - Where the hell did you come from?
  • Antifa - You crossed the line several times
  • Marxism - If this ideology was an equation, it would be 0x ≠ 0
  • File:PCB-ML.png Marxism-Leninism - You stripped him of the very few good things he had and created a monster
  • Trotskyism - If I had a virus, I wouldn't cough in face of people
  • Communalism - I won't share my toothbrush with a commie on steroids, you weirdo
  • Hive-Mind Collectivism - I won't share my body with a commie on double steroids either
  • Longism - My favorite fairy tale
  • Gaddafism - An islamic socialist anti-western marxist-based ideology? No thanks
  • FALGSC - What the hell is this?
  • Orbanism - This is what your grandpa used to buy you as a kid when you asked for Putinism
  • Anarcho-Primitivism - So you're telling us to go back thousand of years in time just because you miss launching stones at each other, undoing what people have died for? Really?
  • Fordism - Pablo Escobar would have been proud, but I'm not
  • Jihadism - You have a place in hell all for you
  • Populism - Please stop infecting our politics
  • Populariesm - You caused several revolts in Rome
  • Islamic Populism - Look how you massacred him
  • Ochlocracy - The jacobin version of him
  • Radical Apoliticism - I can't say whether you're joking or not
  • Men's Liberation - I support people's choices, but DAMN...

Users

Real Life Relations

My mother: Social Democracy

My father: Apoliticism

My sister: Pink Capitalism

A classmate I hate: Catholic Workerism

A classmate who's a dumbass: Cultural Nationalism

A classmate I despise: Socialism with human face

Opinion towards head of states

Opinion concerning current issues

LGBTQ+ Community's rights

In my opinion, making a distinction between the rights of heterosexuals and all others is like making a distinction between light and dark hair. I see absolutely no reason why a homosexual couple should not enjoy the same rights as a heterosexual one. On the other hand, if you exhibit something obscene during a demonstration, LGBTQ+ or not, it is obscene.

Gay adoptions

I will only say that homosexual couples cannot adopt a child if someone presents me with the results of a trustworthy study stating the 'abnormality' of children raised by homosexual couples.

Abortion

Preventing abortion means denying a woman the human and fundamental right to be the master of her own body. I would only prevent abortion if too long after conception

Military Spendings

Personally, I don't live in the US, and my country doesn't spend that much on the military, but as far as the yanks are concerned, you can only afford to spend that much money on the military if you have first solved all the internal deficiencies, and as things stand, you are far from that goal.

Education Price

Everyone who has attended college knows what it means to have to save a lifetime to pay for tuition, books and accommodation. I am referring to you, O student who has fallen into the hands of File:Soc.png socialism after these bad experiences, try to look at everything more objectively. Imposing a price cut would cause serious problems for the economy and in the long run would only make you poorer.

Trade Unions

I am against the unions, all they do is complain all day and get nowhere. And if they ever did get anything done, their decision would most likely bankrupt the company in question, and all the workers would lose their jobs, or it would lead to the company itself going into a negative balance sheet, forcing layoffs and wage cuts. For my alternative to trade unions, read the economic section

Weapon Dealing

Weapons should be distinguished between tolerable, such as shotguns or drum guns, and intolerable, such as machine guns. Making guns accessible to everyone means increasing crime exponentially, and I am for a clean state.

Drug Dealing and Prostitution

Unlike weapons, which are potential public dangers, drugs and prostitution should be legalised, regularised and taxed. What is best for a prostitute? To be exploited by criminal corporations without protection or rights, or to work legally, earning the state money and enjoying health and human rights? On drugs, however, we should only legalise soft drugs. Some might argue that drugs can be dangerous, especially when driving. And I reply, so is alcohol. All we need to do is tighten up the controls so that the crime rate does not increase.

Immigration

Oof, hot topic. Immigration must be regularised first. For immigrants, I would have in mind a special plan to enable them in the country in the short term, helping them to find work. The immigrant, once he has found employment, would have to repay the debt he has accrued to the state, but in a rather unimpressive way. However, if the immigrant refuses or does not show enough commitment, we will be forced to find him/her temporary accommodation before re-impatriating him/her. We are good, yes, but we are not fools

State Religion, Secularism or State Atheism?

The right to profess one's faith is constitutional, so both state atheism and imposed state religion are anti-constitutional. I can put up with states that have an official religion, but tolerate other faiths as well, in order to preserve their historical identity, which, like it or not, is part of the history of almost every country. I believe that religion should be protected as a cultural asset, in the case of my country, therefore, the Catholic religion, which, objectively, has been and still is a large part of our culture.

Enviroment

I would simply apply the aforementioned principles to gradually push companies to invest in renewable (or nuclear) resources without them having economic losses

External Policy

If economically the more countries are united, the better, militarily, I think it is important to preserve a safe environment for our nation, even through arms sales or direct military involvement.

Crucifix in schools?

In my country, Italy, the debate on whether we should have crucifixes in classrooms is still raging, albeit less than a few years ago. To date, the law only requires it to be displayed in primary and secondary schools. According to critics, the crucifix would be a violation of parents' rights in free religious instruction, while according to the conservative and reactionary wing, the crucifix is part of our culture and should not be discouraged. In my opinion, we should adopt a similar approach to Austria: if a certain percentage or more of students are Catholic, the crucifix can be displayed at the discretion of the school leadership. Finally, if at least half of the classes state, through their class representatives, that they want the crucifix removed, the school is obliged to accede to the requests.

Woke Culture

Woke Culture is, without a shadow of a doubt, the worst element of the culture of the new millennium so far.

United Nations

To recap, the Taliban have taken control of Afghanistan, China is committing countless genocides among Tibetans and Uighurs, Russia still holds Crimea, there is a freaking cartel war in Mexico, Turkey is deporting Syrian and Kurdish refugees, and dozens of nations are fighting jihadist insurgencies. Now, WHERE ARE YOU, UNITED NATIONS?

Globalization

At this point we are all sure that globalisation is inevitable, but not unmanageable. Economic globalisation must be shaped according to the needs of the nation and its citizens. This means making sure the national market does have the upper hand, but with foreign markets also having the power, through competition, to shape prices in favour of the consumers and growth.

What does Rome have to do with this?

We all know Rome, the cultural cradle of Europe for years and years. And it is this feeling, this desire to return to being the cultural beacon of Europe, that separates me from pure File:Progress.png progressivism. Of course, I don't have the territorial holdings of the Roman Empire, but some territories surely belong to the state of Italy: Istria, Savoy, Nice and the Ticino area. For the rest, in my opinion, the new meaning of restoring the Roman Empire is to become the jewel of Europe, culturally, economically and socially.

Test Results

The Political Compass

Economic Left/Right : 1.0


Social Liberal/Authoritarian : 1.0

Ideology Assignment:













12values

Federal 67% / 33% Unitary (Federal)

Democracy 20% / 80% Autocratic (Oligarchy)

Autocratic 50% / 50% Freedom (Centrist)

Internationalism 80% / 20% Nationalism (Internationalism)

Militarist 85% / 15% Pacifist (Militarist)

Assimilationist 60% / 40% Multiculturalist (Centrist)

Collectivize 30% / 70% Privatize (Mixed Economic)

Planned 50% / 50% Markets (Centrist)

Isolationist 50% / 50% Globalist (Globalist)

Secular 30% / 70% Religious (Moderate)

Progress 70% / 30% Tradition (Progressive)

Accelerate 85% / 15% Decelerate (Accelerationist)

Ideology Assignment: Classical Liberalism (ain't too sure about this assignment)

Infvalues (you may need to zoom for this one)

I didn't like how the original look of the table was, so I remade it highlighting my ideas

Template:Nonquad Template:Caps Template:Welfare Template:Centrist <comments />

Retrieved from "https://polcompball.wiki/wiki/User:SweatingCup2632?oldid=132549"