Radical Centrism: Difference between revisions

From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
|aliases={{Collapse|
|aliases={{Collapse|
RadCent<br>
RadCent<br>
[[File:EnlightenedCentrism.png]] Enlightened Centrism [[File:Encent2.png]]<br>
RAD Centrist<br>
Centrist Extremism<br>
"For all the good against all the bad"-ism<br>
Radical Syncretism<br>
[[file:NoLabels.png]] No Labels (In the [[file:Cball-US.png]] U.S.)<br>
[[File:Centrist-yellow.png]] Full-Compass Unity<br>
[[File:Centrist-yellow.png]] Full-Compass Unity<br>
Evil Brother (by [[File:Antcent.png]] [[Anti-Centrism]])<br>
[[File:VeryRadCent.png]] RAD Centrist<br>
[[File:VeryRadCent.png]] Totally RADICAL Centrist<br>
Radical Syncretism<br>
[[File:Syncretic-Steroids.png]] Syncretism On Steroids<br>
Synthetisism On Steroids<br>
[[File:4way.png]] Fourth Way<br>
Fanatical Center<br>
Fanatical Center<br>
Centrist Extremism<br>
Alt-Middle/Center<br>
Alt-Middle/Center<br>
Extreme/Far-Center/Middle Ground <br>
Ultracenter<br>
Ultracenter<br>
Tough Centrism<br>
Tough Centrism<br>
Militant Moderatism<br>
Centrist that grew a spine<br>
Centrist that grew a spine<br>
Militant Moderatism<br>
Compromise Fanatic<br>
Compromise Fanatic<br>
Final boss for Anti-Centrists<br>
[[File:Giddenism.png]] Giddenism <br>
[[File:EnlightenedCentrism.png]] Enlightened Centrism [[File:Encent2.png]]<br>
Crypto-Rightism (according to many [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|leftists]])<br>
[[File:Syncretic-Steroids.png]] Syncretism On Steroids<br>
Synthetisism On Steroids<br>
[[File:VeryRadCent.png]] Totally RADICAL Centrist<br>
[[File:4way.png]] Fourth Way<br>
Selective Centrism<br>
Selective Centrism<br>
Neo-Plaineism<br>
Scientific Politics (By himself and others)<br>
Literally Political Opportunism (Accused)<br>
Literally Political Opportunism (Accused)<br>
Non-Partisanism<br>
Non-Partisanism<br>
Nonpartisan Radicalism<br>
Anti-normie centrist<br>
Anti-Normie Centrist<br>
Extreme/Far-Center/Middle Ground <br>
Neo-Plaineism<br>
[[File:ZoomerCentrism.png]] Zoomer Centrist<br>
[[File:ZoomerCentrism.png]] Zoomer Centrist<br>
Scientific Politics (By himself and others)<br>
Fifth Position (According to some political compasses)<br>
Perfect Balance (According to himself)<br>
Perfect Balance (According to himself)<br>
Fifth Position (According to some political compasses)<br>
Stressed Liners (According to PewResearch Center)<br>
Stressed Liners (According to PewResearch Center)<br>
[[File:Giddenism.png]] Giddenism<br>
[[file:NoLabels.png]] No Labels (In the [[file:Cball-US.png]] U.S.)<br>
{{Alias|Antcent.png|Anti-Centrism|Evil Brother}}<br>
{{Alias|Leftunity.png|:Category:Left-Unity|Crypto-Rightism}}<br>
"For all the good against all the bad"-ism<br>
}}
}}
|school =
|school =
Line 72: Line 72:
**[[File:Liberalsoc.png]] [[Liberal Socialism]]
**[[File:Liberalsoc.png]] [[Liberal Socialism]]
**[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]]
**[[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] [[Neoliberalism]]
**[[File:SynOneNat.png]] [[One-Nation Conservatism|One-Nationism]]
**[[File:Onenatcon.png]] [[One-Nation Conservatism]]
**[[File:LibTory.png]] [[Liberal Conservatism|Philosophic Conservatism]]
**[[File:LibTory.png]] [[Liberal Conservatism|Philosophic Conservatism]]
**[[File:Pragmat.png]] [[Machiavellianism|Pragmatism]]
**[[File:Pragmat.png]] [[Machiavellianism|Pragmatism]]
Line 115: Line 115:
'''Variants'''{{Collapse|
'''Variants'''{{Collapse|
[[File:Centre-Lib.png|link=:Category:Centrists]] [[:Category:Centrists|{{Color|#C0C0C0|'''Center-'''}}]][[:Category:Libertarian Unity|{{GradientSpan|text='''Lib'''|direction=right|#C9E5BD|#F5F5A9}}]] ([[File:Haidt.png]] Haidtism) <br>
[[File:Centre-Lib.png|link=:Category:Centrists]] [[:Category:Centrists|{{Color|#C0C0C0|'''Center-'''}}]][[:Category:Libertarian Unity|{{GradientSpan|text='''Lib'''|direction=right|#C9E5BD|#F5F5A9}}]] ([[File:Haidt.png]] Haidtism) <br>
[[File:Cright.png|link=:Category:Centrists]] [[:Category:Centrists|{{Color|#C0C0C0|'''Center-'''}}]][[:Category:Right_Unity|{{Color|#93DAF8|'''Rig'''}}]][[:Category:Right_Unity|{{Color|#F5F5A9|'''ht'''}}]] ([[File:Manchin.png]] Manchinism) <br>
[[File:ModTrad.png|link=:Category:Cultural Center]] [[:Category:Cultural Center|{{Color|#8BC34A|'''Culturally Center-'''}}]][[:Category:Culturally Right|{{Color|#8BC34A|'''Right'''}}]] ([[File:Manchin.png]] Manchinism) <br>
}}
}}
|influences=
|influences=
Line 139: Line 137:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMAIsqvTh7g Stuck in the Middle with you - Stealers Wheel]<br>
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMAIsqvTh7g Stuck in the Middle with you - Stealers Wheel]<br>
<s>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1BneeJTDcU Welcome to the Internet]</s><br>
<s>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1BneeJTDcU Welcome to the Internet]</s><br>
<s>[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KUDjRZ30SNo&pp=ygUYbmljayBjbGVnZyBpbSBzb3JyeSBzb25n The Nick Clegg Apology Song: I'm Sorry (The Autotune Remix)]</s><br>
|theorists=[[File:PanAmer.png]] '''Americas''' {{Collapse|
|theorists=[[File:PanAmer.png]] '''Americas''' {{Collapse|
*[[File:Technocracy.png]] [[Technocracy|Jane Jacobs]] (1916-2006) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
*[[File:Technocracy.png]] [[Technocracy|Jane Jacobs]] (1916-2006) [[File:Cball-US.png]] {{PBW|USAball|USA}}
Line 162: Line 161:
[[File:Cball-Commonwealth.png]] '''Commonwealth Realm''' {{Collapse|
[[File:Cball-Commonwealth.png]] '''Commonwealth Realm''' {{Collapse|
*[[File:Giddenism.png]] [[Third Way|Anthony Giddens]] (1938-) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] {{PBW|UKball|UK}}
*[[File:Giddenism.png]] [[Third Way|Anthony Giddens]] (1938-) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] {{PBW|UKball|UK}}
*[[File:TonyBlair.png]] [[Third Way|Tony Blair]] (1953-) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] {{PBW|UKball|UK}}
*[[File:NickClegg.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Nick Clegg]] (1967-) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] {{PBW|UKball|UK}}
*[[File:NickClegg.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Nick Clegg]] (1967-) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] {{PBW|UKball|UK}}
}}
}}
[[File:Cball-EU.png]] '''Europe''' {{Collapse|
[[File:Cball-EU.png]] '''Europe''' {{Collapse|
*[[File:Hołownia.png]] [[Green Liberalism|Szymon Hołownia]] (1976-) [[File:Cball-Poland.png]] {{PBW|Polandball|Poland}}
*[[File:Hołownia.png]] [[Green Liberalism|Szymon Hołownia]] (1976-) [[File:Cball-Poland.png]] {{PBW|Polandball|Poland}}
*[[File:Zelensky.png]] [[Populism|Volodmyr Zelenskyy]] (1978-) [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] {{PBW|Ukraineball|Ukraine}}
*[[File:SpaCiudadanos.png]] [[Liberalism|Albert Rivera]] (1979-) [[File:Cball-Spain.png]] {{PBW|Spainball|Spain}}
*[[File:SpaCiudadanos.png]] [[Liberalism|Albert Rivera]] (1979-) [[File:Cball-Spain.png]] {{PBW|Spainball|Spain}}
*[[File:Loof.png]] [[Green Liberalism|Annie Lööf]] (1983-) [[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] {{PBW|Swedenball|Sweden}}
*[[File:Loof.png]] [[Green Liberalism|Annie Lööf]] (1983-) [[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] {{PBW|Swedenball|Sweden}}
Line 226: Line 227:
===Radical Centrism Union===
===Radical Centrism Union===
*[[File:3way.png]] [[Third Way]] - My sweet adopted child.
*[[File:3way.png]] [[Third Way]] - My sweet adopted child.
*[[File:Plain.png]] [[La Plaineism]] - My french predecessor.
*[[File:Lib.png]] [[Liberalism]] - Good principles. You embrace both left and right.
*[[File:Synclib.png]] [[Big Tent Liberalism]] - Were we separated at birth?
*[[File:Synclib.png]] [[Big Tent Liberalism]] - Were we separated at birth?
*[[File:Progconf.png]] [[Progressive Conservatism]] - I admire your pragmatic way of solving cultural issues.
*[[File:Progconf.png]] [[Progressive Conservatism]] - I admire your pragmatic way of solving cultural issues.
*[[File:Antrans.png]] [[Archeofuturism]] & [[File:ReactPix.png]] [[Reactionary Modernism]] - Best stances on technology.
*[[File:Soccap.png]] [[Social Capitalism]] & [[File:Orlib.png]] [[Ordo-Liberalism]] - Free market and social justice.
*[[File:Capcom.png]] [[Capitalist Communism]] & [[File:Statecap.png]] [[State Capitalism]] - Love your economics.
*[[File:Pragmat.png]] [[Machiavellianism|Pragmatism]] - Actual policies over useless dogma.
*[[File:Pragmat.png]] [[Machiavellianism|Pragmatism]] - Actual policies over useless dogma.
*[[File:Radlib.png]] [[Radicalism]] - '''Radical''' Centrist Gang! You did a great job back in the day. <s>Wait, you are no longer radical? Shame.</s>
*[[File:Radlib.png]] [[Radicalism]] - '''Radical''' Centrist Gang! You did a great job back in the day. <s>Wait, you are no longer radical? Shame.</s>
*[[File:NuKeynesPix.png]] [[Keynesian School#Neo-Keynesian Economics|Neo-Keynesian Economics]] - Synthesizing neoclassical and Keynesian economics to solve problems demonstrated by empirical proof? That's the pragmatic and scientific spirit I want to see!
*[[File:NuKeynesPix.png]] [[Keynesian School#Neo-Keynesian Economics|Neo-Keynesian Economics]] - Synthesizing neoclassical and Keynesian economics to solve problems demonstrated by empirical proof? That's the pragmatic and scientific spirit I want to see!
*[[File:Corptism.png]] [[Corporatism]] - Class collaboration pragmatism.
*[[File:Classdeal.png]] [[Class Dealignment]] - Pretty much me but more focused on just economics.
*[[File:Classdeal.png]] [[Class Dealignment]] - Pretty much me but more focused on just economics.
*[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] [[Scientocracy]] & [[File:Neotech.png]] [[Technoliberalism]] - Objective science and merit over ideological infighting.
*[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] [[Scientocracy]] & [[File:Neotech.png]] [[Technoliberalism]] - Objective science and merit over ideological infighting.
*[[File:Raddem.png]] [[Radical Democracy]] - The best form of democracy.
*[[File:Secular.png]] [[Secularism]] - Church and state must be separated for all.
*[[File:Plain.png]] [[La Plaineism]] - My french predecessor.
*[[File:SpaCiudadanos.png]] [[Liberalism|Ciudadanism]] - The most based party in Spain.
*[[File:SpaCiudadanos.png]] [[Liberalism|Ciudadanism]] - The most based party in Spain.


Line 253: Line 253:
*[[File:Socdem.png]] [[Social Democracy]] - How about ''affordable'' healthcare and education?
*[[File:Socdem.png]] [[Social Democracy]] - How about ''affordable'' healthcare and education?
*[[File:Soclib.png]] [[Social Liberalism]] - How about ''necessary'' state intervention in the economy?
*[[File:Soclib.png]] [[Social Liberalism]] - How about ''necessary'' state intervention in the economy?
*[[File:Civlibert.png]] [[Civil Libertarianism]] and [[File:Lib.png]] [[Liberalism]] - How about free speech and limited government ''except'' when it's anti-compromise?
*[[File:Civlibert.png]] [[Civil Libertarianism]] - How about free speech and limited government ''except'' when it's anti-compromise?
*[[File:Fiscon.png]] [[Fiscal Conservatism]] - How about ''some'' fiscal responsibility as long as it doesn't go against the welfare of the people?
*[[File:Fiscon.png]] [[Fiscal Conservatism]] - How about ''some'' fiscal responsibility as long as it doesn't go against the welfare of the people?
*[[File:Keynes.png]] [[Keynesian School]] - How about ''responsible'' money printing?
*[[File:Keynes.png]] [[Keynesian School]] - How about ''responsible'' money printing?
*[[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] [[Piratism]] - How about we loosen copyright to a ''certain'' extent while still allowing artists to own their creations?
*[[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] [[Piratism]] - How about we loosen copyright to a ''certain'' extent while still allowing artists to own their creations?
*[[File:Cdem.png]] [[Christian Democracy]] & [[File:Islamic Democracy.png]] [[Islamic Democracy]] - How about ''a little bit'' of religion in government but we maintain separation of church and state?
*[[File:Cdem.png]] [[Christian Democracy]] & [[File:Islamic Democracy.png]] [[Islamic Democracy]] - How about ''a little bit'' of religion in government but we maintain separation of church and state?
*[[File:Secular.png]] [[Secularism]] - And how about we separate church and state but still allow them to have some influence?
*[[File:Laicism.png]] [[Secularism|Laicism]] - And how about we separate church and state but still allow them to have some influence?
*[[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism]] - How about we have ''some'' workers' rights and public property?
*[[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism]] - How about we have ''some'' workers' rights and public property?
*[[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism]] - How about we allow free trade and private property to a ''certain'' extent?
*[[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism]] - How about we allow free trade and private property to a ''certain'' extent?
Line 281: Line 281:
*[[File:Nalib.png]] [[National Liberalism]] - We both like [[File:SpaCiudadanos.png]] Albert Rivera, [[File:RPUSA.png]] Ross Perot, Michael Lind and early [[File:Trump 2000.png]] Donald Trump, but overall you're a mixed bag. <small> Like the other ideologies here btw.</small>
*[[File:Nalib.png]] [[National Liberalism]] - We both like [[File:SpaCiudadanos.png]] Albert Rivera, [[File:RPUSA.png]] Ross Perot, Michael Lind and early [[File:Trump 2000.png]] Donald Trump, but overall you're a mixed bag. <small> Like the other ideologies here btw.</small>
*[[File:European_Federalism.png]] [[European Federalism]] - The EU does have its problems, but we can still improve it.
*[[File:European_Federalism.png]] [[European Federalism]] - The EU does have its problems, but we can still improve it.
*[[File:Socliber.png]] [[Social Libertarianism]] & [[File:Steinval.png]] [[Steiner-Vallentyne School]] - How about ''some'' state power? But Yang is based.
*[[File:Socliber.png]] [[Social Libertarianism]], [[File:Bhl.png]] [[Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism]] & [[File:Steinval.png]] [[Steiner-Vallentyne School]] - How about ''some'' state power? But Yang is based.
*[[File:Corptism.png]] [[Corporatism]] - Maybe class collaboration pragmatism. But you are too authoritarian.
*[[File:Orlib.png]] [[Ordo-Liberalism]] & [[File:Soccap.png]] [[Social Capitalism]] - Similar to the above, if a bit less "tilted".
*[[File:Contrarianism-Icon.png]] [[Contrarianism]] - How about making valid criticisms of the status quo instead of blindly hating it? <small>Seriously, a lot of you guys make me close to putting you in the enemies section.</small>
*[[File:Contrarianism-Icon.png]] [[Contrarianism]] - How about making valid criticisms of the status quo instead of blindly hating it? <small>Seriously, a lot of you guys make me close to putting you in the enemies section.</small>


Line 332: Line 332:


====Criticism====
====Criticism====
*The Radical Centre: A Politics Without Adversary (1998) by [[File:Neomarx.png]] [[Neo-Marxism|Chantal Mouffe]] 
*The Radical Centre: A Politics Without Adversary (1998) by [[File:Raddem.png]] [[Radical Democracy|Chantal Mouffe]] 
*Beware the Radical Center (2017) by Ryan Shah
*Beware the Radical Center (2017) by Ryan Shah



Latest revision as of 11:41, 1 June 2024

"Morality binds and blinds. It binds us into ideological teams that fight each other as though the fate of the world depended on our side winning each battle. It blinds us to the fact that each team is composed of good people who have something important to say."

Radical Centrism, shortened to RadCent is a term used to describe an ideology that advocates for radical change and measures, with an emphasis on pragmatism over ideology.

The essence of Radical Centrism can be described as something along the lines of “ideological grocery shopping”. It uses policy positions from any ideology across the political spectrum in a non-partisan pragmatic way to solve individual issues with the fundamental goal of reforming institutions.

History

TBA

Foundations and Beliefs

Radical centrism is a concept that arose in Western nations in the late 20th century. Despite being conflated with ideologies such as syncretism, dead centrism, moderatism, radical liberalism or anti-extremism, it is actually a “meta ideology” that may incorporate elements of these frameworks. Radical centrism, instead of actively searching for a compromise between extremist ideologies like a dead or moderate centrist, is willing to use radical solutions. It uses individual policy proposals from across the political spectrum in a pragmatic way that does not fall upon partisan lines. There are no clearly defined policies for radical centrists but the ideology places a heavy emphasis on pragmatism over ideology, going so far as to call themselves “unideological” or “anti-ideological” due to their willingness to break through party lines to solve systems. Radical centrists borrow ideas from the left and the right, often melding them together and incorporating aspects that are complementary. It should be noted that although the radical centrist has a tendency towards moderate solutions, he isn’t above radical solutions. There is support for the growth of an empowered middle class. General policies common to many radical centrists and radical centrist literature include-

1. A commitment to fiscal responsibility, even if it means reducing social programs.

2. A commitment to market-based solutions in health care, education, energy, the environment etc so long as the solutions are carefully regulated by the government to serve the public good. The policy goal, says Matthew Miller, is to "harness market forces for public purposes".

3. A commitment to providing jobs for everyone willing to work, by subsidizing jobs in the private sector.

4. A commitment to need-based rather than race, gender or other identity-based affirmative action; more generally, a commitment to identity-neutral ideals.

5. A commitment to participate in institutions and processes of global governance.

6. A commitment to decentralization of power to limit corruption through methods such as a Swiss-style direct democracy

Personality

RadCent when in contact with other ideologies will try to get them to "peacefully talk it out" and often incorporate their policies into their own framework. He can be quite commanding in the presence of other ideologies when he needs to be due to being more coherent and radical (get it?) than other centrist ideologies. He can get hypnotized by the four quadrants, tricking him into accepting policies from all around the compass.

How to Draw

Flag of Radical Centrism
  1. Draw a ball with eyes.
  2. Fill it in grey.
  3. "Carve out" 4 arrows from the 4 cardinal directions of the ball pointing towards the centre of the ball.
  4. Separate each arrow into 2 parts around the center of each arrow.
  5. Fill the sections of the ball with the color of each of the political compass that corresponds to the relative area on the political compass.
Color Name HEX RGB
Grey #778899 119, 136, 153
Pale red #FF6262 255, 98, 98
Pale blue #00B1FF 0, 177, 255
Pale yellow #FFFF80 255, 255, 128
Pale green #00FF88 0, 255, 136


Relationships

Radical Centrism Union

Misguided Centrists

  • Moderatism - He agrees both sides should compromise, but he also thinks being radical is bad.
  • Horseshoe Centrism - Says there's no difference between balance and imbalance as if that makes much sense.
  • Dead Centrism - Both sides may be bad, but this "exactly 50%" thing seems rather impractical. Also, I hate when people constantly stereotype me as if I'm you.
  • Reformism - Being a radical is actually good!

"You have some good ideas, but you should consider some compromise with them"

  • Neoliberalism - How about partially open borders and less outsourcing?
  • Neoconservatism - Just bomb the uncompromising ideologies but maybe don’t forget the nation building?
  • Conservatism - How about preserving traditions but still embracing progress in some areas?
  • Progressivism - How about progress in some aspects of society but still keeping some heritage?
  • Social Democracy - How about affordable healthcare and education?
  • Social Liberalism - How about necessary state intervention in the economy?
  • Civil Libertarianism - How about free speech and limited government except when it's anti-compromise?
  • Fiscal Conservatism - How about some fiscal responsibility as long as it doesn't go against the welfare of the people?
  • Keynesian School - How about responsible money printing?
  • Piratism - How about we loosen copyright to a certain extent while still allowing artists to own their creations?
  • Christian Democracy & Islamic Democracy - How about a little bit of religion in government but we maintain separation of church and state?
  • Laicism - And how about we separate church and state but still allow them to have some influence?
  • Socialism - How about we have some workers' rights and public property?
  • Capitalism - How about we allow free trade and private property to a certain extent?
  • Corporatocracy - How about we allow only some corporate power?
  • Libertarianism and Classical Liberalism - How about some corporate freedom but we regulate them when things get out of control?
  • Authoritarianism - How about having a strong government but allowing the people to speak out?
  • Nationalism - How about praising your nation unless it does something wrong?
  • Globalism - How about uniting humanity but giving them some independence?
  • Industrialism - How about we industrialize but still preserve some natural sites?
  • Environmentalism - We can fight climate change without hurting too much the economy and local production, what do you think?
  • Neoluddism - Can we mititagte the problems of the Industrial Society without completely getting rid of it?
  • Transhumanism - We can embrace technology without radically altering humanity, don't think so?
  • Alt-Lite, Right-Wing Populism & National Conservatism - How about combating the excesses of globalism, multiculturalism, and progressivism while maintaining their good aspects? Also to some of your more net-savvy followers, how about actually compromising instead of just hijacking my name to look good?
  • Alter-Globalism, Left-Wing Populism & Democratic Socialism - And how about opposing the excesses of traditionalism, free-market capitalism, and corporate power while maintaining their good aspects too?
  • Police Statism - How about a limited police force?
  • Stratocracy - And a limited military?
  • Mediacracy - What about a limited mass media influence on society?
  • Meritocracy & Technocracy - Yes, you are very intelligent and skilled, but that doesn't mean you get to dictate all of society, because all opinions including those from ordinary people are equally important feedback to our society. I find they are much more preferable to you two.
  • Liberal Socialism & Market Socialism - Honestly not too bad by socialist standards, but I'd still rather just have decent worker's rights and a solid enough social welfare system than an eventual goal of complete social ownership.
  • Welfare Chauvinism - How about we defend the welfare state and put the citizens of your nation first without completely rejecting internationalism and free trade?
  • Trumpism - You used to be cooler in 2000. Why did you leave me for this guy? Also, can you stop gatekeeping people like my friend here? Whether they are RINOs or not does not matter because I support the Reform party anyway (the one you sadly abandoned).
  • National Liberalism - We both like Albert Rivera, Ross Perot, Michael Lind and early Donald Trump, but overall you're a mixed bag. Like the other ideologies here btw.
  • European Federalism - The EU does have its problems, but we can still improve it.
  • Social Libertarianism, Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism & Steiner-Vallentyne School - How about some state power? But Yang is based.
  • Corporatism - Maybe class collaboration pragmatism. But you are too authoritarian.
  • Contrarianism - How about making valid criticisms of the status quo instead of blindly hating it? Seriously, a lot of you guys make me close to putting you in the enemies section.

Uncompromising Morons

Further Information

Literature

  • Independent Nation (2004) by John Avlon
  • Toward a Radical Middle (1969) by Renata Adler
  • Stalking the Radical Middle (1995) by Joe Klein
  • The Radical Center (2001) by Ted Halstead and Micheal Lind
  • The Two Percent Solution (2003) by Matthew Miller
  • Radical Middle (2004) by Mark Satin
  • Ethical Realism (2006) by Anatol Lieven and John Hulsman
  • Break Through (2007) by Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger
  • Food from the Radical Center (2018) by Gary Paul Nadhan
  • Winning the Race (2005) by John McWhorter
  • Unfinished Business (2016) by Anne-Marie Slaugher
  • Try Common Sense (2019) by Philip K. Howard
  • The Origin of Wealth (2006) by Eric Beinhoker
  • How to Run the World (2011) by Philip K. Howard
  • The Righteous Mind (2012) by Jonathan Haidt
  • Voice of the People (2008) by Lawrence Chikering
  • Radical Middle: Confessions of an Accidental Revolutionary (2010) by Dennis Becket
  • On New and Radical Centrism (2018) by Alexandru Filip
  • The Time for Radical Centrism Has Come (2018) by Micheal D. Fricklas
  • The Radical Middle: Building Bridges Between the Muslim and Western Worlds (2012)
  • Road to Generation Equity (1995) by Tim Penny, Richard Lamm and Paul Tsongas
  • An Invitation to Join the Radical Center (2003) by Gary Paul Nabhan
  • Ground Rules for Civil Society: A Radical Centrist Manifesto (2003) by Ernest Prabhakar
  • The Cape York Agenda (2009) by Noel Pearson
  • Ten Big Ideas for a New America (2007) by New America Foundation
  • Depolarizing the American Mind (2014) by Steve McIntosh and Carter Phipps
  • Radix: Think Tank for the Radical Centre (2016) by David Boyle
  • California for All (2019) by Michael Shellenberger

Criticism

  • The Radical Centre: A Politics Without Adversary (1998) by Chantal Mouffe 
  • Beware the Radical Center (2017) by Ryan Shah

YouTube

Channels

Videos

Wikipedia

Organizations

Online Communities

Gallery

Navigation