Blanquism: Difference between revisions

From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MessageBox/Stub}}
{{MessageBox/Stub}}
{{Ideology
{{Ideology
| themecolor = #ff0000
|themecolor = #ff0000
| textcolor = #ffffff
|textcolor = #ffffff
| title =[[File:Blanqui.png]] Blanquism
|title = [[File:Blanqui.png]] Blanquism
| image =Blanquism draw.png
|image = Blanquism draw.png
|caption = "He who has iron, has bread. People bow down before bayonets; a disarmed crowd is swept aside."
| caption ="''No gods, no masters!''"
| aliases =
|aliases =
Conspiratorial Socialism <br>
Conspiratorial Socialism <br>
{{Alias|Luxem.png|Luxemburgism|[[File:Orthlen.png]] [[Leninism]]}}<br>
{{Alias|Luxem.png|Luxemburgism|[[File:Orthlen.png]] [[Leninism]]}}<br>
Line 16: Line 16:
[[File:Statesoc.png]] [[State Socialism]]
[[File:Statesoc.png]] [[State Socialism]]
|song = [https://youtu.be/ypP19NdZiE0 Arditi - Imposing Elitism]
|song = [https://youtu.be/ypP19NdZiE0 Arditi - Imposing Elitism]
|theorists = [[File:Blanqui.png]] [[w:Louis Auguste Blanqui|Louis Auguste Blanqui]] (1805-1881)
|theorists = [[File:Blanqui.png]] [[State Socialism|Louis Auguste Blanqui]] (1805-1881) [[File:Cball-France.png]] France
|likes = Coups<br>
|likes = Coups<br>
Elites (as long as they are leftists)<br>
Elites (as long as they are leftists)<br>
Line 26: Line 26:
Pluralism (Political theory)
Pluralism (Political theory)
}}
}}
'''Blanquism''' is an authoritarian, economically left ideology and revolutionary strategy based off the ideas of [[w:Louis_Auguste_Blanqui|Louis Auguste Blanqui]]. It advocates for revolutionaries to take the most radical line as possible, and to never accept compromises in any situation at all. It also believes in the idea that revolutions are dictated by a small minority through careful planning.
'''Blanquism''' is an authoritarian, economically left ideology and revolutionary strategy based on the ideas of Louis Auguste Blanqui. It advocates for revolutionaries to take the most radical line possible, and to never accept compromises in any situation at all. It also believes in the idea that revolutions are dictated by a small minority through careful planning.


==Alleged Connections to Lenin and Leninism==
==Alleged Connections to Lenin and Leninism==
[[File:Orthlen.png]] [[Leninism]] has often been compared to Blanquism, usually by left-wing critics of it. [[File:Luxem.png]] [[Luxemburgism|Rosa Luxemburg]] was one of the first to make the comparison, due to Lenin's vanguardism, and his favoring of highly centralized and repressive governance<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1906/06/blanquism.html</ref>. Modern day [[File:Councom.png]] [[Council Communism|council communists]], [[File:Libsoc.png]] [[Libertarian Socialism|libertarian socialists]] and [[File:Ancom.png]] [[Anarcho-Communism|anarcho-communists]] also often criticize Leninism as being similar to Blanquism. Lenin himself rejected this comparison, and was heavily critical of Blanquism, as he said, "We have always heard a chorus of accusation that we were too inflexible and ossified, too adamant. And yet our opponents call us “Blanquists”, “anarchists” and “true socialists”. The Blanquists are conspirators (they have never been in favour of the general strike), they exaggerate the importance of revolutionary government"<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1906/may/26.htm</ref> and "To become a power the class-conscious workers must win the majority to their side. ''As long as no'' violence is used against the people there is no other road to power. We are not Blanquists, we do not stand for the seizure of power by a minority. We are Marxists, we stand for proletarian class struggle against petty-bourgeois intoxication, against chauvinism-defencism, phrase-mongering and dependence on the bourgeoisie"<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/apr/09.htm</ref>.
[[File:Orthlen.png]] [[Leninism]] has often been compared to Blanquism, usually by left-wing critics of it. [[File:Luxem.png]] [[Luxemburgism|Rosa Luxemburg]] was one of the first to make the comparison, due to Lenin's vanguardism, and his favoring of highly centralized and repressive governance<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1906/06/blanquism.html</ref>. Modern-day [[File:Councom.png]] [[Council Communism|council communists]], [[File:Libsoc.png]] [[Libertarian Socialism|libertarian socialists]] and [[File:Ancom.png]] [[Anarcho-Communism|anarcho-communists]] also often criticize Leninism as being similar to Blanquism. Lenin himself rejected this comparison, and was heavily critical of Blanquism, as he said, "We have always heard a chorus of accusation that we were too inflexible and ossified, too adamant. And yet our opponents call us “Blanquists”, “anarchists” and “true socialists”. The Blanquists are conspirators (they have never been in favour of the general strike), they exaggerate the importance of revolutionary government"<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1906/may/26.htm</ref> and "To become a power the class-conscious workers must win the majority to their side. ''As long as no'' violence is used against the people there is no other road to power. We are not Blanquists, we do not stand for the seizure of power by a minority. We are Marxists, we stand for proletarian class struggle against petty-bourgeois intoxication, against chauvinism-defencism, phrase-mongering and dependence on the bourgeoisie"<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/apr/09.htm</ref>.


==History==
==History==
Line 48: Line 48:
* [[File:Reactsoc.png]] [[ Reactionary Socialism]] - You are WAY TOO religious, decentralized, and culturally right for me, but you are a fellow authoritarian, elitist, and anti-Marxist socialist, so I consider you a comrade!
* [[File:Reactsoc.png]] [[ Reactionary Socialism]] - You are WAY TOO religious, decentralized, and culturally right for me, but you are a fellow authoritarian, elitist, and anti-Marxist socialist, so I consider you a comrade!
*[[File:Orthlen.png]] [[Leninism]] - You carry my ideas so well! <s>But why do you say that you hate me?</s>
*[[File:Orthlen.png]] [[Leninism]] - You carry my ideas so well! <s>But why do you say that you hate me?</s>
*[[File:Burmasoc.png]] [[Buddhist Socialism|Burmese Way to Socialism]] - We both have state socialism as an end goal and support coups as a method of takeover.


===Frenemies===
===Frenemies===
Line 61: Line 62:
* [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] [[Right-Wing Populism]] and [[File:Ispop.png]] [[Islamic Populism]] - You are right-wing, religious and populist? TRIPLE CRINGE!
* [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] [[Right-Wing Populism]] and [[File:Ispop.png]] [[Islamic Populism]] - You are right-wing, religious and populist? TRIPLE CRINGE!
* [[File:Populare.png]] [[Populareism]] - ...You're just pathetic.
* [[File:Populare.png]] [[Populareism]] - ...You're just pathetic.
* [[File:Ochlo.png|frameless]] [[Ochlocracy]] - Never trust the masses, ladies and gentlemen.
* [[File:Ochlo.png]] [[Ochlocracy]] - Never trust the masses, ladies and gentlemen.
* [[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism]] - You are cringe, old idiot. I disagree with you about so many things that I don't even know where to start. And... It should be me that's the one that many leftists around the world look upon as a reference person, not you. Damn it!
* [[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism]] - You are cringe, old idiot. I disagree with you about so many things that I don't even know where to start. And... It should be me that the leftists around the world look upon as a reference person, not you. Damn it!


==Further Reading==
==Further Reading==

Revision as of 09:19, 28 July 2023

Blanquism is an authoritarian, economically left ideology and revolutionary strategy based on the ideas of Louis Auguste Blanqui. It advocates for revolutionaries to take the most radical line possible, and to never accept compromises in any situation at all. It also believes in the idea that revolutions are dictated by a small minority through careful planning.

Alleged Connections to Lenin and Leninism

Leninism has often been compared to Blanquism, usually by left-wing critics of it. Rosa Luxemburg was one of the first to make the comparison, due to Lenin's vanguardism, and his favoring of highly centralized and repressive governance[1]. Modern-day council communists, libertarian socialists and anarcho-communists also often criticize Leninism as being similar to Blanquism. Lenin himself rejected this comparison, and was heavily critical of Blanquism, as he said, "We have always heard a chorus of accusation that we were too inflexible and ossified, too adamant. And yet our opponents call us “Blanquists”, “anarchists” and “true socialists”. The Blanquists are conspirators (they have never been in favour of the general strike), they exaggerate the importance of revolutionary government"[2] and "To become a power the class-conscious workers must win the majority to their side. As long as no violence is used against the people there is no other road to power. We are not Blanquists, we do not stand for the seizure of power by a minority. We are Marxists, we stand for proletarian class struggle against petty-bourgeois intoxication, against chauvinism-defencism, phrase-mongering and dependence on the bourgeoisie"[3].

History

W.I.P.

How to draw

Flag of Blanquism
  1. Draw a ball with eyes
  2. Fill it red
  3. Inside it draw a white sword

Relationships

Friends

  • State Socialism - Based. In fact, to be able to put in practice socialism, we need to have authoritarianism and have a centralized authority. The LeftUnity and the LibLeft are just naive people.
  • Oligarchy - The best form of government to achieve socialism.
  • Reactionary Socialism - You are WAY TOO religious, decentralized, and culturally right for me, but you are a fellow authoritarian, elitist, and anti-Marxist socialist, so I consider you a comrade!
  • Leninism - You carry my ideas so well! But why do you say that you hate me?
  • Burmese Way to Socialism - We both have state socialism as an end goal and support coups as a method of takeover.

Frenemies

  • Utopian Socialism - I am technically a form of you, but you're pretty cringe most of the time.
  • Left-Wing Populism - While I appreciate your socialism, you need to realize that ELITISM AND AUTHORITARIANISM ARE NECESSARY TO CREATE SOCIALISM!!
  • Illuminatism - Blf ziv yzhvw, yfg R droo mvevi gifhg blf, zmw ru hlnvlmv nfhg xlmgilo vmgriv xlfmgirvh, vhkvxrzoob Uizmxv, gszg hlnvlmv nfhg yv nv, mlg blf. Mlgsrmt kvihlmzo. (You are based, but I will never trust you, and if someone must control entire countries, especially France, that someone must be me, not you. Nothing personal.)

Enemies

  • Anarcho-Communism - No coups? No elitism? Class analysis? CRINGE, CRINGE, CRINGE!
  • Populism - Why do you want to be helped by the stupid masses? How can you trust them to do what you want to do politically? They will ruin your plans. I do not understand you. CRINGE!
  • Right-Wing Populism and Islamic Populism - You are right-wing, religious and populist? TRIPLE CRINGE!
  • Populareism - ...You're just pathetic.
  • Ochlocracy - Never trust the masses, ladies and gentlemen.
  • Marxism - You are cringe, old idiot. I disagree with you about so many things that I don't even know where to start. And... It should be me that the leftists around the world look upon as a reference person, not you. Damn it!

Further Reading

Wikipedia

Literature

Websites

Citations

  1. ↑ https://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1906/06/blanquism.html
  2. ↑ https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1906/may/26.htm
  3. ↑ https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/apr/09.htm

Gallery

Navigation

Retrieved from "https://polcompball.wiki/wiki/Blanquism?oldid=406015"