Classical Social Democracy: Difference between revisions

From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content added Content deleted
Line 220: Line 220:


==History==
==History==

===Lassalle and Marx===
=== Early Foundations ===
In Germany, two major strains of socialist thought had been established, one would be considered as "Marxism", another would be "Lassallism". These two tendencies would mostly be hostile to one another, Marx along with other socialist figures like W. Liebknecht and A. Bebel had heavily criticized Lassalle for his collusion with Bismarck and reformism.

===Formation of the SPD===
==== Lassalle and Marx ====
[[File:Three Arrows election poster of the Social Democratic Party of Germany, 1932 - Gegen Papen, Hitler, Thälmann.png|thumb|180px|''"Three Arrows"'' 1932 SPD election poster.]]
The origins of Classical Social Democracy can be traced back to the mid-19th century, deeply influenced by the works and ideologies of two pivotal figures: Ferdinand Lassalle and Karl Marx. Lassalle, a German-Jewish jurist, philosopher, and socialist political activist, played a crucial role in the early socialist movement in Germany. In 1863, he founded the General German Workers' Association (''Allgemeiner Deutscher Arbeiterverein'', ADAV), which is considered one of the earliest socialist parties. Lassalle advocated for state intervention and universal suffrage, believing that the state could be a tool for workers to achieve their goals. He focused on practical measures to improve workers' lives, such as legal reforms and social insurance programs, viewing these as essential steps towards a more equitable society.
===USPD and Rosa===

===Becoming Social Democracy===
Karl Marx, a German philosopher, economist, and revolutionary socialist, co-authored "The Communist Manifesto" with Friedrich Engels in 1848, which laid the foundation for much of socialist theory. Marx's ideas on class struggle, the proletariat revolution, and the critique of capitalism were foundational to socialist thought. Unlike Lassalle, Marx was more skeptical of the existing state structures and emphasized the need for a proletarian revolution to overthrow the capitalist system. He argued that the state, under capitalism, was inherently tied to the interests of the bourgeoisie, making it an unsuitable vehicle for true socialist transformation.
The death of Luxemburg and Liebknicht meant there was no prominent movement aiming for the immediate overthrow of the global capitalist system. This allowed [[File:Socauth.png]] [[Social Authoritarianism|Friedrich Ebert]] to take the movement in a new direction that ran counter to its original goal. Ebert forced the revolutionary section of the SPD out of the party. From now on, the party’s goal would be to make minor reforms to [[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism|capitalism]] while carrying on the [[File:GerSPD.png]] aesthetics and [[File:Lpop.png]] populist messaging of the old party. This tactic essentially turned a once radical [[File:Ormarxf.png]] [[Marxism|Marxist]] party into a milquetoast moderate [[File:Socdem.png]] [[Social Democracy|social democratic]] or even [[File:3way.png]] [[Third Way|third wayer]] party.

==== Ideological Differences ====
The ideological differences between Lassalle and Marx shaped the early debates within the socialist movement. Lassallean socialism was more reformist, believing in working within the existing political system to bring about change. Lassalle emphasized the importance of achieving immediate practical benefits for workers through state intervention, such as legal reforms and social welfare programs. He believed that the state could be transformed into an instrument of social justice through democratic means.

In contrast, Marxist socialism argued for a more revolutionary approach, where the working class would rise up against the bourgeoisie to establish a classless, stateless society. Marx criticized Lassalle for his reliance on the state, viewing it as inherently tied to the interests of the bourgeoisie. Marx believed that true socialism could only be achieved through the overthrow of the capitalist system and the establishment of a proletarian state, which would eventually wither away as class distinctions disappeared.

=== Formation of the SPD ===

==== Merging of Ideologies ====
The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) was formed in 1875 through the merger of two socialist groups: the ADAV, founded by Lassalle, and the Social Democratic Workers' Party of Germany (''Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei Deutschlands'', SDAP), founded by Wilhelm Liebknecht and August Bebel, who were more aligned with Marxist principles. This merger marked a significant step in the unification of the socialist movement in Germany.

The unification was formalized at the Gotha Congress in 1875, resulting in the "Gotha Program", which attempted to reconcile the differences between the Lassallean and Marxist factions. The program outlined a platform that included both immediate reforms, such as labor protections and social insurance, and long-term goals, such as the abolition of class distinctions and the establishment of a socialist society. However, the Gotha Program was criticized by Marx in his "Critique of the Gotha Program" for being too conciliatory towards Lassallean ideas, particularly its emphasis on state intervention and its insufficient focus on revolutionary change.

==== Growth and Influence ====
Despite the ideological tensions within the SPD, the party continued to grow in influence and membership. The Anti-Socialist Laws, enacted by Otto von Bismarck between 1878 and 1890, aimed to suppress socialist activities by banning socialist organizations, meetings, and publications. However, these laws also unintentionally galvanized the movement, leading to increased support for the SPD as a symbol of resistance against repression. When the laws were lifted in 1890, the SPD emerged as a major political force in Germany.

In 1891, the SPD adopted the "Erfurt Program", which clearly outlined the party’s Marxist goals while also emphasizing the need for practical reforms. This program marked a significant step in the SPD’s development, balancing revolutionary aims with immediate political and social demands. The Erfurt Program called for the nationalization of key industries, progressive taxation, and the establishment of a welfare state, while also advocating for the abolition of class distinctions and the eventual establishment of a socialist society through democratic means.

=== Internal Struggles and the Rise of the USPD ===

==== World War I and Internal Divisions ====
The outbreak of World War I in 1914 caused deep divisions within the SPD. The party's leadership, under pressure to demonstrate patriotism and support for the national war effort, voted in favor of war credits, aligning with the government’s stance. This decision was highly controversial and led to significant internal conflict, as many within the party opposed the war on ideological grounds. The SPD's support for the war effort was seen as a betrayal of its socialist principles, which advocated for international solidarity among workers and opposed militarism and imperialism.

The faction supporting the war, known as the Majority SPD (MSPD), believed that the conflict was a defensive measure necessary to protect the nation from external threats. They argued that supporting the war effort would prevent a potential invasion and preserve Germany's sovereignty. This stance was supported by trade unions and other pragmatic factions within the SPD who feared the repercussions of opposing the government during wartime.

In contrast, the Minority SPD (MSPD), led by prominent figures such as Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, vehemently opposed the war. They viewed it as an imperialist struggle between rival capitalist powers, exploiting the working class and diverting resources away from social reforms. Liebknecht and Luxemburg advocated for international solidarity among workers and called for mass strikes and protests to end the war. Their anti-war stance was rooted in Marxist principles, emphasizing class struggle and the revolutionary potential of the proletariat.

==== Russian Revolution and the Split ====
The Russian Revolution of 1917 had a profound impact on the socialist movement in Germany. The overthrow of the Tsarist regime and the establishment of Soviet power inspired radical elements within the SPD, particularly the Spartacus League led by Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht. The Spartacists, as they were known, saw the Russian Revolution as a model for socialist transformation through revolutionary action.

In December 1918, the Spartacists broke away from the SPD and formed the Communist Party of Germany (KPD), aligning themselves with the Bolsheviks in Russia. The split was a result of irreconcilable differences over strategy and ideology between the revolutionary Spartacists and the reformist leadership of the SPD. The KPD advocated for immediate socialist revolution, the establishment of workers' councils (soviets), and the overthrow of the capitalist state. Luxemburg and Liebknecht emerged as key figures in the new communist movement, promoting a vision of socialism based on direct action and proletarian power.

=== Becoming Social Democracy ===

==== Post-War Reforms and the Weimar Republic ====
Following World War I, the SPD became a major political force in the newly established Weimar Republic. The party played a key role in shaping the democratic constitution and implementing social reforms. Under the leadership of Friedrich Ebert, the SPD sought to stabilize the country and prevent a communist revolution. The Ebert-Groener Pact, an alliance between the SPD government and the military, was instrumental in maintaining order but also controversial, as it involved the suppression of leftist uprisings.

The SPD's participation in the Weimar government was marked by efforts to balance revolutionary aspirations with pragmatic governance. The party implemented significant social reforms, including labor protections, social insurance programs, and expanded democratic rights. These efforts aimed to address the needs of the working class and reduce social inequalities, while also ensuring the stability and viability of the democratic republic.

==== Shift Towards Reformism ====
Over time, the SPD increasingly embraced a reformist stance, focusing on achieving socialism through democratic means and gradual reforms rather than revolutionary upheaval. The evolution of the SPD’s ideology reflected a pragmatic approach to political participation and governance. The party recognized the challenges of revolutionary change in a complex and diverse society and sought to work within the democratic framework to achieve its goals.

The shift towards reformism was formally codified in the Bad Godesberg Program of 1959. This program marked a significant departure from the party’s earlier Marxist revolutionary goals, embracing a modern social democratic platform that emphasized social justice, economic stability, and political democracy. The Bad Godesberg Program advocated for a mixed economy, with both public and private sectors playing roles in economic development, and highlighted the importance of social welfare programs to ensure a fair distribution of wealth and opportunities.


==Beliefs==
==Beliefs==

Revision as of 11:16, 29 June 2024

"As long as capitalism remains, there can be no real democracy."

Classical Social Democracy is a political movement that traces its roots to the Social Democratic Party of Germany. Its theories range from Marxist to reformist perspectives. Despite these differences, social democrats share three core beliefs. First, they see themselves as representatives of all non-capitalist classes. Second, they believe in the ultimate victory of socialism, regardless of the methods required to achieve it. Third, they advocate for the formation of an independent organization of the working class. The movement emphasizes the need for social and economic reforms to create a more equitable society, aiming to bridge the gap between the working class and the ruling capitalist class through democratic means.

History

Early Foundations

Lassalle and Marx

The origins of Classical Social Democracy can be traced back to the mid-19th century, deeply influenced by the works and ideologies of two pivotal figures: Ferdinand Lassalle and Karl Marx. Lassalle, a German-Jewish jurist, philosopher, and socialist political activist, played a crucial role in the early socialist movement in Germany. In 1863, he founded the General German Workers' Association (Allgemeiner Deutscher Arbeiterverein, ADAV), which is considered one of the earliest socialist parties. Lassalle advocated for state intervention and universal suffrage, believing that the state could be a tool for workers to achieve their goals. He focused on practical measures to improve workers' lives, such as legal reforms and social insurance programs, viewing these as essential steps towards a more equitable society.

Karl Marx, a German philosopher, economist, and revolutionary socialist, co-authored "The Communist Manifesto" with Friedrich Engels in 1848, which laid the foundation for much of socialist theory. Marx's ideas on class struggle, the proletariat revolution, and the critique of capitalism were foundational to socialist thought. Unlike Lassalle, Marx was more skeptical of the existing state structures and emphasized the need for a proletarian revolution to overthrow the capitalist system. He argued that the state, under capitalism, was inherently tied to the interests of the bourgeoisie, making it an unsuitable vehicle for true socialist transformation.

Ideological Differences

The ideological differences between Lassalle and Marx shaped the early debates within the socialist movement. Lassallean socialism was more reformist, believing in working within the existing political system to bring about change. Lassalle emphasized the importance of achieving immediate practical benefits for workers through state intervention, such as legal reforms and social welfare programs. He believed that the state could be transformed into an instrument of social justice through democratic means.

In contrast, Marxist socialism argued for a more revolutionary approach, where the working class would rise up against the bourgeoisie to establish a classless, stateless society. Marx criticized Lassalle for his reliance on the state, viewing it as inherently tied to the interests of the bourgeoisie. Marx believed that true socialism could only be achieved through the overthrow of the capitalist system and the establishment of a proletarian state, which would eventually wither away as class distinctions disappeared.

Formation of the SPD

Merging of Ideologies

The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) was formed in 1875 through the merger of two socialist groups: the ADAV, founded by Lassalle, and the Social Democratic Workers' Party of Germany (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei Deutschlands, SDAP), founded by Wilhelm Liebknecht and August Bebel, who were more aligned with Marxist principles. This merger marked a significant step in the unification of the socialist movement in Germany.

The unification was formalized at the Gotha Congress in 1875, resulting in the "Gotha Program", which attempted to reconcile the differences between the Lassallean and Marxist factions. The program outlined a platform that included both immediate reforms, such as labor protections and social insurance, and long-term goals, such as the abolition of class distinctions and the establishment of a socialist society. However, the Gotha Program was criticized by Marx in his "Critique of the Gotha Program" for being too conciliatory towards Lassallean ideas, particularly its emphasis on state intervention and its insufficient focus on revolutionary change.

Growth and Influence

Despite the ideological tensions within the SPD, the party continued to grow in influence and membership. The Anti-Socialist Laws, enacted by Otto von Bismarck between 1878 and 1890, aimed to suppress socialist activities by banning socialist organizations, meetings, and publications. However, these laws also unintentionally galvanized the movement, leading to increased support for the SPD as a symbol of resistance against repression. When the laws were lifted in 1890, the SPD emerged as a major political force in Germany.

In 1891, the SPD adopted the "Erfurt Program", which clearly outlined the party’s Marxist goals while also emphasizing the need for practical reforms. This program marked a significant step in the SPD’s development, balancing revolutionary aims with immediate political and social demands. The Erfurt Program called for the nationalization of key industries, progressive taxation, and the establishment of a welfare state, while also advocating for the abolition of class distinctions and the eventual establishment of a socialist society through democratic means.

Internal Struggles and the Rise of the USPD

World War I and Internal Divisions

The outbreak of World War I in 1914 caused deep divisions within the SPD. The party's leadership, under pressure to demonstrate patriotism and support for the national war effort, voted in favor of war credits, aligning with the government’s stance. This decision was highly controversial and led to significant internal conflict, as many within the party opposed the war on ideological grounds. The SPD's support for the war effort was seen as a betrayal of its socialist principles, which advocated for international solidarity among workers and opposed militarism and imperialism.

The faction supporting the war, known as the Majority SPD (MSPD), believed that the conflict was a defensive measure necessary to protect the nation from external threats. They argued that supporting the war effort would prevent a potential invasion and preserve Germany's sovereignty. This stance was supported by trade unions and other pragmatic factions within the SPD who feared the repercussions of opposing the government during wartime.

In contrast, the Minority SPD (MSPD), led by prominent figures such as Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, vehemently opposed the war. They viewed it as an imperialist struggle between rival capitalist powers, exploiting the working class and diverting resources away from social reforms. Liebknecht and Luxemburg advocated for international solidarity among workers and called for mass strikes and protests to end the war. Their anti-war stance was rooted in Marxist principles, emphasizing class struggle and the revolutionary potential of the proletariat.

Russian Revolution and the Split

The Russian Revolution of 1917 had a profound impact on the socialist movement in Germany. The overthrow of the Tsarist regime and the establishment of Soviet power inspired radical elements within the SPD, particularly the Spartacus League led by Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht. The Spartacists, as they were known, saw the Russian Revolution as a model for socialist transformation through revolutionary action.

In December 1918, the Spartacists broke away from the SPD and formed the Communist Party of Germany (KPD), aligning themselves with the Bolsheviks in Russia. The split was a result of irreconcilable differences over strategy and ideology between the revolutionary Spartacists and the reformist leadership of the SPD. The KPD advocated for immediate socialist revolution, the establishment of workers' councils (soviets), and the overthrow of the capitalist state. Luxemburg and Liebknecht emerged as key figures in the new communist movement, promoting a vision of socialism based on direct action and proletarian power.

Becoming Social Democracy

Post-War Reforms and the Weimar Republic

Following World War I, the SPD became a major political force in the newly established Weimar Republic. The party played a key role in shaping the democratic constitution and implementing social reforms. Under the leadership of Friedrich Ebert, the SPD sought to stabilize the country and prevent a communist revolution. The Ebert-Groener Pact, an alliance between the SPD government and the military, was instrumental in maintaining order but also controversial, as it involved the suppression of leftist uprisings.

The SPD's participation in the Weimar government was marked by efforts to balance revolutionary aspirations with pragmatic governance. The party implemented significant social reforms, including labor protections, social insurance programs, and expanded democratic rights. These efforts aimed to address the needs of the working class and reduce social inequalities, while also ensuring the stability and viability of the democratic republic.

Shift Towards Reformism

Over time, the SPD increasingly embraced a reformist stance, focusing on achieving socialism through democratic means and gradual reforms rather than revolutionary upheaval. The evolution of the SPD’s ideology reflected a pragmatic approach to political participation and governance. The party recognized the challenges of revolutionary change in a complex and diverse society and sought to work within the democratic framework to achieve its goals.

The shift towards reformism was formally codified in the Bad Godesberg Program of 1959. This program marked a significant departure from the party’s earlier Marxist revolutionary goals, embracing a modern social democratic platform that emphasized social justice, economic stability, and political democracy. The Bad Godesberg Program advocated for a mixed economy, with both public and private sectors playing roles in economic development, and highlighted the importance of social welfare programs to ensure a fair distribution of wealth and opportunities.

Beliefs

The beliefs of Social-Democrats are often very divided, ranging from reformism to pure direct action. In spite of this, they are all united in one common struggle, the construction of a mass workers movement to overthrow capitalism.

Variants

Bremen Left

Bremen Leftists, or Bremenists are a tendency within the Social Democratic Party of Germany that emphasises on the revolutionary role of direct action. Rejecting Kautsky's and Luxemburg's ideas that capitalism will collapse through economic means, the Bremenists advocate for a focus on mass action in working-class organisations and rejection of entryism and "taking over the state". The Bremenists would instead advocate for the abolishment of the state and the creation of a proletarian one. Alongside that, they would place special emphasis in the idea that the basis of reformism is the labour aristocracy and the rejection of national liberation.

Centrism

The Centrists were a major faction within the SPD, which theory is mainly based on the works of Karl Kautsky. While embracing revolution, they support parliamentarianism (as a tactic to get more popular). A fundamental belief of theirs is the concept of the merger formula, which emphasizes the role of intellectuals in creating socialist consciousness and theory. However, these intellectuals, having no material need for liberation, cannot be the subject of social revolution. A quote from the newspaper Die Neue Zeit written in 1902 by Karl Kautsky illustrates this concept "Modern socialist consciousness can arise only on the basis of profound scientific knowledge. Indeed, modern economic science is as much a condition for socialist production as, say, modern technology, and the proletariat can create neither the one nor the other, no matter how much it may desire to do so; both arise out of the modern social process. The vehicle of science is not the proletariat, but the bourgeois intelligentsia: it was in the minds of individual members of this stratum that modern socialism originated, and it was they who communicated it to the more intellectually developed proletarians who, in their turn, introduce it into the proletarian class struggle where conditions allow that to be done. Thus, socialist consciousness is something introduced into the proletarian class struggle from without and not something that arose within it spontaneously.". It should be said, however, that Centrists believe that the main vehicle for social change should be the mass movement of the proletariat, instead of something like the vanguard party and such.

Lassalleism

State

In contrast with Marx and his adherents, Lassalle rejected the idea that the state was a class-based power structure with the function of preserving existing class relations and destined to wither away in a future classless society. Instead, Lassalle considered the state as an independent entity, an instrument of justice essential for the achievement of the socialist program.

Iron law of wages

Lassalle accepted the idea first posited by the classical economist David Ricardo that wage rates in the long term tended towards the minimum level necessary to sustain the life of the worker and to provide for his reproduction. In accord with the law of rent, Lassalle coined his own iron law of wages. Lassalle argued that individual measures of self-help by wage workers were destined to failure and that only producers' cooperatives established with the financial aid of the state would make economic improvement of the workers' lives possible. From this, it followed that the political action of the workers to capture the power of the state was paramount and the organization of trade unions to struggle for ephemeral wage improvements is more or less a diversion from the primary struggle.

Philosophy

Lassalle considered Johann Gottlieb Fichte as "one of the mightiest thinkers of all peoples and ages", praising Fichte's Addresses to the German Nation in a May 1862 speech as "one of the mightiest monuments of fame which our people possesses, and which, in depth and power, far surpass everything of this sort which has been handed down to us from the literature of all time and peoples".

Spartacist Left

One of the many radical factions within Social Democracy centered around Luxemburg, the Spartacist Left is one of the more centrist-aligned ones. Embracing Social Democracy as the proletariat instead of being the vanguard of the proletariat, the Spartacist Left would advocate for the masses to "reconquer" the mass movements that have fallen to revisionism instead of rejecting those movements. Luxemburg would also believe in the idea of "economism", which assumes that capitalism will collapse through mechanic and economic factors that don't include the proletariat.

Behavior and Personality

Classical Social Democracy is very contrarian and hates anyone trying to undermine the working class but Classical Social Democracy is often rather confused as it doesn't have a central program, so in conflicts between its children it tries to mend relations as best as possible.

How to Draw

Symbols

Flags

Flag of Classical Social Democracy
Color Name HEX RGB
Dark Red #950000 149, 0, 0
Coffee Gold #DA8E43 218, 142, 67
Gold #FDBD59 253, 189, 89
Beige #FBFD82 251, 253, 130

The flag design of Classical Social Democracy is based on a old SPD banner and a simplified version of that banner. It has a dark red background, a coffee gold wreath, two golden hands shaking and a beige ribbon.

Props

Classical Social Democracy can often be seen holding old socialist flags when in action but when things are more calm it walks around with a wooden cane.

Drawing

  1. Draw a ball,
  2. Fill the ball in dark red,
  3. Draw a coffee golden wreath
  4. Draw a beige ribbon at the bottom of the wreath
  5. Draw a pair of golden hands shaking in the center
  6. Draw two eyes
  7. And you're done
Color Name HEX RGB
Dark Red #950000 149, 0, 0
Coffee Gold #DA8E43 218, 142, 67
Gold #FDBD59 253, 189, 89
Beige #FBFD82 251, 253, 130


Relationships

Friends

  • Abolitionism - Long live the Union!
  • Council Communism - My a little too blanquist son, learn to reform some time.
  • Leninism - One of my most loyal comrades, albeit too anarcho-syndicalistic and too much of a "Stirnerized Proudhonian".
  • Radical Social Democracy - I am the only real social democrat He is just a murderous fake.
  • Left-Wing Populism - I used your tactics to gain power and to bring Germany (and the world) to the brink of rebellion. Such a shame to see succdems force this potentially revolutionary power within the confines of liberal democracy.

Frenemies

  • Reformist Marxism - You may have been a revisionist and had turned me into what I am today, but we are all common brothers of the great Socialist tradition.
  • Liberal Socialism - You are naïve and often counter-revolutionary but a People's Front is the best defence against fascism.
  • Democratic Socialism - I am you but many of you are too liberal and utopian to be effective revolutionaries due to your blind acceptance of parliamentarian politics.
  • Keynesian School - You could show me how to build socialism but you are way too liberal and anti-revolutionary for my liking, Rosa killer.

Enemies

  • Theory of Social Contract - This theory is very lovely, it has only one error: it is false.
  • Social Democracy - You betrayed everything you stood for and killed Luxemburg. I hate you with every fiber of my being. I hate you.
  • Third Way - You're just worse than the guy above, prepare for a bullet!
  • Social Authoritarianism - Wow, I didn't know that anyone could manage to be worse than a killer or a neoliberal with welfare. You have stolen my theories and have managed to convince people that socialism is nothing more than the "government doing stuff."
  • Bismarckism - Lassalle sold us out, he undermined the workers movement by working with you by taking the institutions of the worker and making them the institutions of the State.
  • Capitalism - Long live the international fraternization of peoples! Down with capitalism!

Gallery

Portraits

Alternative designs

Further Information

Wikipedia

Notes

  1. In regards to analysis of monopoly capitalism

References

Navigation