From Polcompball Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

"We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence."

Eugenicism, also called Galtonianism, is a political ideology which seeks to shape public policy in accordance with the field of eugenics. Eugenics is a now supposedly 'discredited' field of science ('pseudoscience') which claims to be the 'study of good genes'. Eugenics takes influence from the Darwinian theory of evolution, which states that organisms develop to better suit a given environment through the gradual dying of organisms that are unsuited to the environment before they can reproduce and applies them to Humans; this is done by selecting traits which are 'desirable' and artificially adjusting the environment to either maximize the reproduction of those with those traits (positive eugenics) or minimizing the reproduction of those with undesirable traits (negative eugenics).

How to Draw

Flag of Eugenicism
  1. Draw a ball
  2. Fill it with black
  3. Draw a red DNA strand
  4. Finish with the eyes!
Color Name HEX RGB
Black #121212 18, 18, 18
Red #FF0000 255, 0, 0





Early forms of Eugenics were practiced for millennia, with some cultures (such as Athens, Sparta, Indigenous Peoples of Brazil and Rome) letting children who were considered to be defect be killed (infanticide). The philosopher Plato advocated for the state to control the reproduction of human beings.[2][3]

19th and early 20th Century

The term 'Eugenics' and 'Dysgenics' were coined by the English polymath Sir Francis Galton in the 1860's after reading Charles Darwin's On The Origin of Species.[1]

Nazi Eugenics

Nazi eugenics refers to the social policies of eugenics in Nazi Germany. The racial ideology of Nazism placed the biological improvement of the German people by selective breeding of "Nordic" or "Aryan" traits at its center.

Those targeted for destruction under Nazi eugenics policies were largely people living in private and state-operated institutions. They included prisoners, degenerates, dissidents, and people with congenital cognitive and physical disabilities- people who were considered to be feeble-minded:

  • Epileptic
  • Schizophrenic
  • Manic-depressive (now known as bipolar)
  • Cerebral palsy or muscular dystrophy
  • Deaf and/or blind
  • Homosexual or "transvestites" (intersex and transgender people)
  • Anyone else considered to be idle, insane, and/or weak as per "feeblemindedness"

All of these were targeted for elimination from the chain of heredity.


Early criticism of eugenics came from the American sociologist Lester Frank Ward,[5] the English writer G.K. Chesterton,[6] German-American anthropologist Franz Boas,[7] and the Scottish physician Halliday Sutherland.[8] In 1930 was officially condemned by Pope Pius XI in his encyclical Casti Connubii[9]

Nonetheless, major action against eugenics was mainly taken only after the Second World War.

Contemporary Eugenics

With the development of technologies which allow for more effective forms of genetic engineering the interest in the revival of eugenics has picked up steam in certain circles, including some transhumanist circles. Eugenics was defended by the New Zealand professor of ethics Nicholas Agar in the form of what he called 'liberal eugenics' in his book of the same title.[10] Liberal eugenics (also called New Eugenics) unlike historical eugenics seeks to involve parents themselves in the process of eugenics, seeking to respect the parent's right to choose what genetic features they deem desirable for their children and to ignore the advice of eugenicists.[11]




  • Feminism - A lot of your early proponents supported me, claiming that giving women more rights would lead to a better race, and we have a mutual love of Margaret Sanger, but why do you want equality and hate it when your opponents tie you to me?
  • Manosphere - Sex Realism is based but you are too pro-life and pro-Neetcel sometimes.
  • Alt-Right - Race realist version of above.
  • Scientocracy - We used to be friends, but we've had a falling out of sorts.
  • Social Darwinism - You took this all way too far.
  • Transhumanism - Why would you want to enhance people with bad genes? And genetic engineering will render selective breeding obsolete.
  • Nazism, Showa Statism & Ittihadism - My ideas in practice. But all of you lost, so now you're considered inferior. Also, all of you tarnished my reputation.
  • Racial Nationalism - My fanboy who doesn't understand me, like, at all. Seriously, "pure race" isn't a "better race"!
  • Ethnonationalism - Same as above.
  • White Nationalism - Caucasian version of the two above.
  • Neoluddism - You... don't do abortion, but I'm pretty sure technology, medicine, Red 40, and fluoride, (all side effects of the Industrial Revolution), do cause disabilities.
  • Ethnopluralism - International segregation is great, but why won't you agree on mass sterilization?
  • Post-Humanism - You are a machine without any biological genes and designed artificially. But on other hand, you are perfection (especially if you evolve into ASI).
  • Nordic Model - We used to be friends until you stabbed me in the back.
  • Fordism - Look I'm not even questioning your method here, I just really don't see why you have to deliberately making part of your population dumb.


  • Kakistocracy - Just keep thinking about the rabbits.
  • Catholic Theocracy - Sterilization and abortion is good actually.
  • Buddhist Theocracy - Same as above.
  • Incestism - Disgusting degenerate who has a fetish about his sister.
  • Progressivism - Ableism is good actually. Also, why did you have to severe our friendship we had a century or two ago?
  • Conservatism - "abORtiOn iZ muRDEr!" Yes, and?
  • Reactionaryism - Embrace enlightenment and science, you stupid reactard. Also, the earth is not 6000 years old.
  • Posadism - While a global nuclear war will kill off a lot of the weak, it will kill a lot of the strong too!
  • Pol Potism - Just a more violent form of kakistocracy that likes to kill smart people.
  • Multiculturalism - Absolute shame.
  • Libertarianism - Free choice? Are you out of your mind??
  • Humanism - Why do you hate me so much? I'm doing this because I wanna improve humanity!
  • Welfarism - Helping disabled "people" is not good, I work far better!
  • Radicalism - Libtard who believes in universal welfare.
  • Marxism-Leninism - More like, "Autistic Retards of the World, Unite!☭"
  • Ergatocracy - Communism and Kakistocracy have a child?! If you'll excuse me... *rushes away to barf*
  • Biological Leninism - My worst nightmare...


Further Information




By Region




  1. 1.0 1.1 Correspondance between Charles Darwin and Francis Galton
  2. 2.0 2.1 Republic, Book 6, Plato
  3. 3.0 3.1 Eugenics, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  4. Project 100,000
  5. Eugenics, Euthenics and Eudemics by Lester F. Ward
  6. Eugenics and Other Evils by G.K. Chesterton
  7. Eugenics by Franz Boas
  8. Birth Control: A Statement of Christian Doctrine Against Neo-Malthusians by Halliday Sutherland
  9. Casti connubii by Pope Pius XI: Those who hold the reins of government should not forget that it is the duty of public authority by appropriate laws and sanctions to defend the lives of the innocent, and this all the more so since those whose lives are endangered and assailed cannot defend themselves. Among whom we must mention in the first place infants hidden in the mother's womb. And if the public magistrates not only do not defend them, but by their laws and ordinances betray them to death at the hands of doctors or of others, let them remember that God is the Judge and Avenger of innocent blood which cried from earth to Heaven.
  10. Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Advancement by Nicholas Agar
  11. Defending Eugenics by Jonathan Anomaly